Abstract
To see how the material of Chapter 9 can be used practically to test for the robustness of poverty comparisons, we focus for simplicity on classes of additive poverty indices denoted as Πs(z +), where s stands again for the “ethical order” of the class and where z + will stand for the upper bound of the range of all of the poverty lines that can reasonably be envisaged. The additive poverty indices P(z) that are members of that class can be expressed as
where z is a poverty line and π(Q(p); z) is an indicator of the poverty status of someone with income Q(p).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
10.4 References
Bishop, J., J. Formby, and L. Zeager (1996): “The Impact of Food Stamps on US Poverty in the 1980s: A Marginal Dominance Analysis,” Economica, 63, S141–62.
Davidson, R. and J.-Y. Duclos (2000): “Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality,” Econometrica, 68, 1435–54.
Del Rio, C. and J. Ruiz Castillo (2001): “Intermediate Inequality and Welfare: The Case of Spain, 1980–81 to 1990–91,” Review of Income and Wealth, 47, 221–37.
Donaldson, D. and J. Weymark (1986): “Properties of fixed-Population Poverty Indices,” International Economic Review, 27, 667–688.
Foster, J. and A. Shorrocks (1988b): “Poverty Orderings,” Econometrica, 56, 173–177.
— (1988c): “Poverty Orderings and Welfare Dominance,” Social Choice Welfare, 5, 179–98.
Jenkins, S. and P. Lambert (1997): “Three’ I’s of Poverty Curves, with an Analysis of UK Poverty Trends,” Oxford Economic Papers, 49, 317–27.
— (1998a): “Ranking Poverty Gap Distributions: Further TIPs for Poverty Analysis,” in Research on economic inequality. Volume 8. Stamford, Conn, ed. by D. J. Slottje, and London: JAJ Press, 31–38.
— (1998b): ““Three’ I’s of Poverty” Curves and Poverty Dominance: Tips for Poverty Analysis,” in Research on economic inequality. Volume 8. Stamford, Conn, ed. by D. J. Slottje, and London: JAI Press, 39–56.
Spencer, B. and S. Fisher (1992): “On Comparing Distributions of Poverty Gaps,” The Indian Journal of Statistics, 54, 114–26.
Zheng, B. (1999a): “On the Power of Poverty Orderings.” Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 349–71.
— (2000a): “Minimum Distribution-Sensitivity, Poverty Aversion, and Poverty Orderings,” Journal of Economic Theory, 95, 116–37.
— (2000b): “Poverty Orderings,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 427–66.
— (2001a): “Poverty Orderings: A Graphical Illustration,” Social Choice and Welfare, 18, 165–78.
Zheng, B., B. Cushing, and V. Chow (1995): “Statistical Tests of Changes in U.S. Poverty, 1975 to 1990,” Southern Economic Journal, 62, 334–47.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2006). Poverty Dominance. In: Poverty and Equity. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being, vol 2. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33318-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-33318-5_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-25893-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-33318-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)