Irish Divorce / Joyce's Ulysses

  • Peter Kuch

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xxviii
  2. Peter Kuch
    Pages 63-88
  3. Peter Kuch
    Pages 89-118
  4. Peter Kuch
    Pages 119-149
  5. Peter Kuch
    Pages 151-176
  6. Peter Kuch
    Pages 177-214
  7. Peter Kuch
    Pages 215-244
  8. Peter Kuch
    Pages 245-252
  9. Back Matter
    Pages 253-289

About this book


This engrossing, ground-breaking book challenges the long-held conviction that prior to the second divorce referendum of 1995 Irish people could not obtain a divorce that gave them the right to remarry. Joyce knew otherwise, as Peter Kuch reveals—obtaining a decree absolute in Edwardian Ireland, rather than separation from bed and board, was possible. Bloom’s “Divorce, not now” and Molly’s “suppose I divorced him”—whether whim, wish, fantasy, or conviction—reflects an Irish practice of petitioning the English court, a ruse that, even though it was known to lawyers, judges, and politicians at the time, has long been forgotten. By drawing attention to divorce as one response to adultery, Joyce created a domestic and legal space in which to interrogate the sometimes rival and sometimes collusive Imperial and Ecclesiastical hegemonies that sought to control the Irish mind. This compelling, original book provides a refreshingly new frame for enjoying Ulysses even as it prompts the general reader to think about relationships and about the politics of concealment that operate in forging national identity


Ulysses Molly Bloom Leopold Bloom Catholicism James Joyce Irish law Divorce

Authors and affiliations

  • Peter Kuch
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Otago DunedinNew Zealand

Bibliographic information