Mississippian Community Organization

The Powers Phase in Southeastern Missouri

  • Michael J. O’Brien
  • James W. Cogswell
  • J. Eric Gilland
  • Daniel S. Glover
  • James J. Krakker
  • Timothy K. Pertula

Part of the Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology book series (IDCA)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xxiii
  2. Michael J. O’Brien
    Pages 1-18
  3. Michael J. O’Brien
    Pages 19-53
  4. Michael J. O’Brien, James J. Krakker
    Pages 77-97
  5. Michael J. O’Brien, Timothy K. Perttula
    Pages 99-140
  6. Michael J. O’Brien, James W. Cogswell
    Pages 141-180
  7. James W. Cogswell, Michael J. O’Brien, Daniel S. Glover
    Pages 181-229
  8. J. Eric Gilliland, Michael J. O’Brien
    Pages 231-264
  9. James W. Cogswell, Michael J. O’Brien
    Pages 265-292
  10. Michael J. O’Brien
    Pages 293-300
  11. Back Matter
    Pages 301-327

About this book

Introduction

The Powers Phase Project was a multiyear archaeological program undertaken in southeastern Missouri by the University of Michigan in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The project focused on the occupation of a large Pleistocene-age terrace in the Little Black River Lowland—a large expanse of lowlying land just east of the Ozark Highland—between roughly A. D. 1250 and A. D. 1400. The largest site in the region is Powers Fort—a palisaded mound center that - ceived archaeological attention as early as the late nineteenth century. Archa- logical surveys conducted south of Powers Fort in the 1960s revealed the pr- ence of numerous smaller sites of varying size that contained artifact assemblages similar to those from the larger center. Collectively the settlement aggregation became known as the Powers phase. Test excavations indicated that at least some of the smaller sites contained burned structures and that the burning had sealed household items on the floors below the collapsed architectural e- ments. Thus there appeared to be an opportunity to examine a late prehistoric settlement system to a degree not possible previously. Not only could the s- tial relation of communities in the system be ascertained, but the fact that str- tures within the communities had burned appeared to provide a unique opp- tunity to examine such things as differences in household items between and among structures and where various activities had occurred within a house. With these ideas in mind, James B. Griffin and James E.

Keywords

Mississippi River Valley Turner and Snodgrass sites americanist archaeology artifacts community organization prehistory

Authors and affiliations

  • Michael J. O’Brien
    • 1
  • James W. Cogswell
  • J. Eric Gilland
  • Daniel S. Glover
  • James J. Krakker
  • Timothy K. Pertula
  1. 1.University of Missouri-ColumbiaColumbia

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/b110676
  • Copyright Information Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002
  • Publisher Name Springer, Boston, MA
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-0-306-46480-5
  • Online ISBN 978-0-306-47196-4
  • Series Print ISSN 1568-2722
  • About this book