Authors:
- Outlines a thoroughly reflected philosophical fundament of the concept of argument and its role in the growth of knowledge
- Proposes a pragmatic and more nuanced understanding of the concept of argumentative practice and the role of subjectivity in the dynamics of argument
- Deploys fascinating historical and contemporary case studies from the French Revolution to today’s embryo debate
- Critically examines axiomatic ‘rational’ arguments, such as economic ones, to expose the need to transcend the limitations of subjectivity
- Includes supplementary material: sn.pub/extras
Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning (LARI, volume 4)
Buy it now
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Other ways to access
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check for access.
Table of contents (10 chapters)
-
Front Matter
-
Back Matter
About this book
Arguing that our attachment to Aristotelian modes of discourse makes a revision of their conceptual foundations long overdue, the author proposes the consideration of unacknowledged factors that play a central role in argument itself. These are in particular the subjective imprint and the dynamics of argumentation. Their inclusion in a four-dimensional framework (subjective-objective, structural-procedural) and the focus on thesis validity allow for a more realistic view of our discourse practice. Exhaustive analyses of fascinating historical and contemporary arguments are provided. These range from Columbus’s advocacy of the Western Passage to India, over the trial of King Louis XVI during the French Revolution, to today’s highly charged controversies surrounding euthanasia and embryo research.
Excavating foundational issues such as the purpose of argument itself (assent of an audience or critical examination of validity claims) and the contested role of argument as a generator of knowledge, the book culminates in a discussion of the relationship between rationality and reasonableness and criticizes the restrictions of ‘rational’ argument relying on fixed logical, economic or cultural criteria that in reality are mutable. Here, a true, open argument requires the infusion of Paul Lorenzen’s principle of ‘transsubjectivity’, which recognizes but transcends the partiality of the individual and which can be seen in the pragmatic and expanding consensus that humanity can control itself to safeguard the future of a fragile, damaged world.
Keywords
Reviews
“The book is intended to be a contribution to contemporary argumentation theory. Wohlrapp’s main goal in this book is to provide a philosophical foundation for a theory of argumentation … . philosophers and argumentation theorists alike will find plenty to engage with in this voluminous book. … it is a welcome addition to the literature on argumentation theory.” (Moti Mizrahi, Metascience, Vol. 24, 2015)
Authors and Affiliations
-
Professor emeritus of philosophy Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Harald R. Wohlrapp
Bibliographic Information
Book Title: The Concept of Argument
Book Subtitle: A Philosophical Foundation
Authors: Harald R. Wohlrapp
Series Title: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8762-8
Publisher: Springer Dordrecht
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law, Philosophy and Religion (R0)
Copyright Information: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014
Hardcover ISBN: 978-94-017-8761-1Published: 11 July 2014
Softcover ISBN: 978-94-024-0685-6Published: 27 September 2016
eBook ISBN: 978-94-017-8762-8Published: 26 June 2014
Series ISSN: 2214-9120
Series E-ISSN: 2214-9139
Edition Number: 1
Number of Pages: LXII, 443
Number of Illustrations: 2 b/w illustrations
Topics: Logic, Pragmatism, Philosophy, general