Advertisement

Ernst Mach’s Vienna 1895–1930

Or Phenomenalism as Philosophy of Science

  • J. Blackmore
  • R. Itagaki
  • S. Tanaka

Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 218)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-x
  2. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 1-27
  3. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 29-59
  4. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 61-83
  5. Henk W. de Regt
    Pages 85-104
  6. Michael Stöltzner
    Pages 105-122
  7. Friedrich von Hayek, Gustav Bergmann, Josef Mayerhöfer
    Pages 123-138
  8. Henk Visser
    Pages 139-158
  9. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 159-186
  10. Michio Imai
    Pages 187-209
  11. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 211-235
  12. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 237-276
  13. J. Blackmore, R. Itagaki, S. Tanaka
    Pages 277-314
  14. Back Matter
    Pages 315-350

About this book

Introduction

Section Guide 1. Prolegomena 2. Biographical Sketch 3. Epistemology 4. Textbook Ontology 1. PROLEGOMENA While both philosophers and historians almost always love truth and the search for truth, and both often carry out extensive research, there can be noticeable differences when historians write about the history of philosophy and when philosophers write about it. Philosophers often look at the past with categories and interests taken from the present or at the least from the recent past, but many historians, especially those who love research for its own sake, will try to look at the past from a perspective either from that period or from even earlier. Both camps look for roots, but view them with different lenses and presupposi tions. This prolegomena has been added to prepare some philosophers for what will hopefully only be the mildest of shocks, for seeing the history of philosophy in a way which does not treat what is recent or latest as best, but which loves the context of ideas for its own sake, a context which can be very foreign to contemporary likes and dislikes. To be sure, we historians can deceive ourselves as easily as philosophers, but we tend to do so about different things.

Keywords

Ludwig Wittgenstein Philosophy of Science Rudolf Carnap idea philosophy science time

Editors and affiliations

  • J. Blackmore
    • 1
  • R. Itagaki
    • 1
  • S. Tanaka
    • 1
  1. 1.History of Science SocietyUSA

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9690-9
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2001
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-90-481-5752-5
  • Online ISBN 978-94-015-9690-9
  • Series Print ISSN 0068-0346
  • Buy this book on publisher's site