Medical History and Physical Examination in Companion Animals

  • A. Rijnberk
  • H. W. de Vries

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-x
  2. A. Rijnberk, H. W. de Vries
    Pages 1-3
  3. A. Rijnberk, H. W. de Vries
    Pages 4-8
  4. A. Rijnberk, W. E. van den Brom
    Pages 21-31
  5. R. J. Slappendel, F. J. van Sluijs
    Pages 32-48
  6. A. Rijnberk
    Pages 49-56
  7. A. Rijnberk
    Pages 57-60
  8. A. Rijnberk, P. G. van Ooijen
    Pages 61-79
  9. H. W. de Vries, A. J. Venker van Haagen
    Pages 80-95
  10. A. A. Stokhof, A. De Rick
    Pages 96-108
  11. R. P. Happé, J. Rothuizen
    Pages 109-126
  12. W. J. Biewenga, R. A. A. van Oosterom
    Pages 127-138
  13. G. C. van der Weyden, J. De Schepper
    Pages 139-149
  14. D. F. Mattheeuws, H. Hoogenkamp
    Pages 150-156
  15. A. Willemse, M. A. Wisselink
    Pages 157-167
  16. G. R. Rutteman, P. G. van Ooijen
    Pages 168-174
  17. H. A. W. Hazewinkel, F. J. Meutstege
    Pages 175-201
  18. J. J. van Nes
    Pages 202-220
  19. F. C. Stades, M. H. Boevé
    Pages 221-254

About this book

Introduction

creation no falsification falsification Tl rejected creation etc. Figure 1-1 delivers such a result that the theory must be seen as an extension of Popper's rational proce­ discarded. In this way we come at the same time dure for theory elimination. to the border between science and nonscience: a Popper's naive falsifiability knows only one theory is scientific if it is falsifiable. It is thus way, the elimination of what is weak. The so­ not scientific to bring additional evidence to phisticated falsifiability, in contrast, knows only bear in vindication of the theory; the theory elimination in combination with the acceptance would thereby take on the character of an un­ of an alternative. According to sophisticated fal­ challengeable certainty of belief ('religion'). sifiability, a scientific theory T r is only aban­ Following Popper, others such as Kuhn, with doned if its place is taken by another theory T2 his paradigm theory, have considerably extended which has the following three characteristics: 1 the range of thought over what is scientific and T 2 has more empirical content than TI; the new what is not.

Keywords

Handling Mamma diagnosis skin

Editors and affiliations

  • A. Rijnberk
    • 1
  • H. W. de Vries
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion AnimalsUtrecht UniversityThe Netherlands

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0459-3
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1995
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-0-7923-3038-7
  • Online ISBN 978-94-011-0459-3
  • About this book
Industry Sectors
Biotechnology
Consumer Packaged Goods
Pharma