Advertisement

Anyone Who Has a View

Theoretical Contributions to the Study of Argumentation

  • Frans H. Van Eemeren
  • J. Anthony Blair
  • Charles A. Willard
  • A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans

Part of the Argumentation Library book series (ARGA, volume 8)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-2
  2. Robert C. Pinto
    Pages 3-15
  3. Harvey Siegel
    Pages 27-40
  4. Ralph H. Johnson
    Pages 41-53
  5. Hans Vilhelm Hansen
    Pages 55-68
  6. David Hitchcock
    Pages 69-82
  7. Erik C. W. Krabbe
    Pages 83-90
  8. Frans H. Van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser
    Pages 123-132
  9. Christian Plantin
    Pages 173-187
  10. Douglas Walton, Chris Reed
    Pages 195-211
  11. Joseph W. Wenzel
    Pages 227-236
  12. G. Thomas Goodnight
    Pages 283-295
  13. Renske Van Enschot-Van Dijk, Lettica Hustinx, Hans Hoeken
    Pages 319-335
  14. Lenore Langsdorf
    Pages 337-346
  15. Back Matter
    Pages 347-347

About this book

Introduction

This volume of the Argumentation Library contains a collection of twenty-six theor­ etical contributions to the study of argumentation. Together they provide an over­ view of recent developments in the theory of argumentation which does justice to the theoretical variety in the field. InAnyone Who Has a View, the subject of argu­ mentation is approached from different angles. Both the formal and informal logical approaches and the rhetorical and communicative approaches arc represented in various ways. We arc convinced that the collection of essays as a whole will be of interest not only to those engaged directly in the study of argumentation, but also to scholars from a variety of disciplines who arc interested in the recent developments in this field. The book opens with an essay by the informal logician Robert C. Pinto. For all the differences between them, James B. Freeman, Harvey Siegel, Ralph H. Johnson, Hans V. Hansen, and J. Anthony Blair are also prominent members of that move­ ment. Some informal logicians either eschew or simply do not use formal methods in their approach to argumentation, while others, such as David Hitchcock, use both formal and informal methods. Erik C.W. Krabbe is a logician who proudly defends a formal dialectical approach to argumentation. Daniel H. Cohen, Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser, Fred J. Kauffeld, C. Scott Jacobs, Christian Kock, Christian Plantin, Sorin Stati, Chris Reed, Douglas N.

Keywords

Argumentation Theory Nation argue discourse formal logic logic

Editors and affiliations

  • Frans H. Van Eemeren
    • 1
  • J. Anthony Blair
    • 2
  • Charles A. Willard
    • 3
  • A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans
    • 1
  1. 1.University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of WindsorCanada
  3. 3.University of LouisvilleUSA

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1078-8
  • Copyright Information Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-1-4020-1456-7
  • Online ISBN 978-94-007-1078-8
  • Series Print ISSN 1566-7650
  • Buy this book on publisher's site