Skip to main content
Book cover

The Case Against Theism

Why the Evidence Disproves God’s Existence

  • Book
  • © 2018

Overview

  • Argues for non-naturalistic alternatives to theism, which adds to the typically naturalism-focused cases against theism
  • Refutes the case for theism and Christianity made by William Lane Craig, an analytic philosopher and Christian apologist
  • Weaves together the methods and knowledge of analytical philosophers and historians of religion

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this book

eBook USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Other ways to access

Licence this eBook for your library

Institutional subscriptions

Table of contents (5 chapters)

Keywords

About this book

This monograph offers a critique of arguments for the existence of a specifically Christian God advanced by prominent scholar William Lane Craig. The discussion incorporates philosophical, mathematical, scientific, historical, and sociological approaches. The author does not seek to criticize religion in general, or Christianity specifically. Rather, he examines the modern and relatively sophisticated evidential case for Christian theism.

Scholars have been arguing for theism or naturalism for centuries, and there seems little to add to the discussion, especially from the theistic side. However, to assume that either theism or naturalism obtains is a false dichotomy. There are alternatives to both that merit consideration. Employing a probabilistic approach, the author advances this discussion. His work uniquely utilizes not only naturalistic hypotheses to argue against theism. It also presents supernaturalistic hypotheses. This leaves no question that theism is almost certainly false, even if some form of divine reality exists.

This project seeks not to argue that Christianity or any other faith or religion is undesirable, but only to critically examine evidentialist claims posited by Christianity’s learned apologists. In fact, a major secondary aim is to consider alternative god-conceptions, such as polytheism and pantheism. This work aims to highlight that Christian theism is often granted special privileges by theistic philosophers of religion, which seems doubly inappropriate when certain alternative god-conceptions may even prove to be more plausible.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Department of Studies in Religion, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

    Raphael Lataster

About the author

Raphael Lataster is an Associate Lecturer in the Studies in Religion department at the University of Sydney. Raphael is interested in Christian origins and alternatives to classical theism, and has published articles in journals such as The International Journal for Philosophy of ReligionSophia, The European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, and Think, among others.

Bibliographic Information

Publish with us