Overview
- Authors:
-
-
German A. Golitsyn
-
Russian Institute of Art Studies, Moscow, Russia
-
Vladimir M. Petrov
-
Russian Institute of Art Studies, Moscow, Russia
Access this book
Other ways to access
Table of contents (6 chapters)
-
-
- German A. Golitsyn, Vladimir M. Petrov
Pages 1-30
-
- German A. Golitsyn, Vladimir M. Petrov
Pages 31-78
-
- German A. Golitsyn, Vladimir M. Petrov
Pages 79-108
-
- German A. Golitsyn, Vladimir M. Petrov
Pages 109-142
-
- German A. Golitsyn, Vladimir M. Petrov
Pages 143-176
-
- German A. Golitsyn, Vladimir M. Petrov
Pages 177-177
-
Back Matter
Pages 179-187
About this book
This book is devoted to one of the central problems of contemporary thinking, for which c.P. Snow in 1959 coined the phrase of the «Two Cultures». In this concept, human endeavour is directed on one side to the (forward-looking) sci ences (mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, etc.) and on the other side to the (backward-looking) humanities (including psychology, linguistics, sociology, etc.). In this dichotomy Snow saw no possibility of unification. On the other hand the urge towards self-consistency and harmony in the mental and spiritual lives of both man and society as a whole is clearly one of the major forces of creativity, both scientific and artistic. This force aims at the unification of the «Two Cultures» in order to build an integrated self-consistent system for our intellectual life. Some attempts in this direction have been made before, and will be described in this book. It is our aim to contribute to the achievement of an integrated mental life on the basis of information theory. In order to construct our model, we examine the laws of information theory, leading us to the deduction of the main laws inherent in both «cultures». Thus, we consider the evolution of both non-living and living matter, human behaviour, the phenomenon of language, the sphere of aesthetics, etc. We hope that our work will be useful both for researchers (who are trying to derive different integral theories) and for various other «consumers» of scientific knowledge (meaning broad circles of intellectuals).
