Security Protocols

1. Performance of Protocols

   • Michael Roe

   Pages 140-146

2. Performance of Protocols

   • Michael Roe

   Pages 147-152

3. Integrity-Aware PCBC Encryption Schemes

   • Virgil D. Gligor, Pompiliu Donescu

   Pages 153-168

4. Integrity-Aware PCBC Encryption Schemes

   • Virgil Gligor

   Pages 169-171

5. The Resurrecting Duckling: Security Issues for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks

   • Frank Stajano, Ross Anderson

   Pages 172-182

6. The Resurrecting Duckling

   • Frank Stajano

   Pages 183-194

7. INTERNET-MARKs: Clear, Secure, and Portable Visual Marks for the Cyber Worlds

   • Hiroshi Yoshiura, Seiichi Susaki, Yasuhiko Nagai, Tsukasa Saitoh, Hisashi Toyoshima, Ryoichi Sasaki et al.

   Pages 195-202

8. INTERNET-MARKs

   • Ryoichi Sasaki

   Pages 203-207

9. Pictures Can’t Lie under Oath

   • Bruce Christianson, James A. Malcolm, Brian Robinson

   Pages 208-211

10. Pictures Can’t Lie under Oath

    • James A. Malcolm

    Pages 212-218

11. Bob versus Bob – Good Guy/Bad Guy

    • Bob Morris

    Pages 219-223

12. Back Matter

    PDF

Another year, another workshop. Here are the proceedings of the seventh Cambridge International Workshop on Security Protocols. All very well, you may think, but can there really still be anything genuinely new to say? Is it not just the same old things a tiny bit better? Well, perhaps surprisingly, this year we discoveredsome radically new things beginning to happen. The reasons in retrospect are not far to seek: advances in technology, changes in the system context, and new types of consumer devices and applications have combined to expose new security requirements. This has led not only to new protocols and models, but also to known protocols being deployedindelicate newways,withpreviousfragilitiesofwatermarkingand- tual authentication, for example, becoming desirable features. At the workshop we identi?ed several of these developments and began to map out some lines of enquiry. This volume brings you a selection of deliberately disputatious position - pers, followed by not-quite-verbatim transcripts of the discussions which they provoked. As always, our purpose in making these proceedings available to you is the hope that they will move your thinking in an unexpected direction. If you ?nd your attention caught by something here, if it makes you pause to re?ect, or to think “why, that is justso wrong”,then good. We’re waiting for your mail.

• Bridge
• Information security
• authentication
• internet security
• networks
• performance
• privacy
• secure networks
• security
• security protocols
• systems security
• trust management
• algorithm analysis and problem complexity

• Computer Science Department, University of Hertfordshire,  

  Bruce Christianson

• Computer Systems Group, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  Bruno Crispo

• Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

  James A. Malcolm

• Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK

  Michael Roe

Policies and ethics