Ethica Dialectica

A Study of Ethical Oppositions

  • Authors
  • Howard P. Kainz

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages I-X
  2. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 1-9
  3. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 10-20
  4. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 21-32
  5. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 33-51
  6. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 52-63
  7. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 64-79
  8. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 80-99
  9. Howard P. Kainz
    Pages 100-116
  10. Back Matter
    Pages 117-163

About this book


"Dialectic" is a fulcrum word. Aristotle attacked this belief, saying that the dialectic was only suitable for some purpose- to enquire into men's beliefs, to arrive at truths about eternal forms of things, known as Ideas, which were fixed and un­ changing and constituted reality for Plato. Aristotle said there is also the method of science, or "physical" method, which observes physical facts and arrives at truths about substances, which undergo change. This duality ofform and substance and the scientific method of arriving at facts about substances were central to Aristotle's philosophy. Thus the dethronement of dialectic from what Socrates and Plato held it to be was ab­ solutely essential for Aristotle, and "dialectic" was and still is a fulcrum word . . . I think it was Coleridge who said everyone is either a Plato­ nist or an Aristotelian . . . Plato is the essential Buddha-seeker who appears again and again in each generation, moving on­ ward and upward toward the "one. " Aristotle is the eternal motorcycle mechanic who prefers the "many. " R.


Aristotle Plato ethics morality

Bibliographic information

  • DOI
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1979
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-94-009-9269-6
  • Online ISBN 978-94-009-9267-2
  • Buy this book on publisher's site
Industry Sectors
Finance, Business & Banking