Advertisement

Evaluation Models

Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation

  • Authors
  • George F. Madaus
  • Michael S. Scriven
  • Daniel L. Stufflebeam

Part of the Evaluation in Education and Human Services book series (EEHS, volume 6)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-xiii
  2. An Overview of Models and Conceptualizations

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 1-1
    2. George F. Madaus, Daniel Stufflebeam, Michael S. Scriven
      Pages 3-22
    3. Daniel L. Stufflebeam, William J. Webster
      Pages 23-43
    4. Ernest R. House
      Pages 45-64
  3. Models and Conceptualizations

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 65-65
    2. Ralph W. Tyler
      Pages 67-78
    3. Andrés Steinmetz
      Pages 79-99
    4. Lee J. Cronbach
      Pages 101-115
    5. Daniel L. Stufflebeam
      Pages 117-141
    6. Robert S. Weiss, Martin Rein
      Pages 143-161
    7. Peter W. Airasian
      Pages 163-175
    8. Robert E. Floden, Stephen S. Weiner
      Pages 177-188
    9. W. James Popham, Dale Carlson
      Pages 205-213
    10. George F. Madaus
      Pages 215-227
    11. Michael Scriven
      Pages 229-260
    12. Robert E. Floden
      Pages 261-277
    13. Robert E. Stake
      Pages 279-286
    14. Egon G. Guba, Yvonna S. Lincoln
      Pages 311-333
    15. Elliot W. Eisner
      Pages 335-347
    16. Kent L. Koppelman
      Pages 349-355
    17. Nick L. Smith
      Pages 381-392
  4. The Standards and the Ninety-Five Theses

    1. Front Matter
      Pages 393-393
    2. Daniel L. Stufflebeam, George F. Madaus
      Pages 395-404
    3. Lee J. Cronbach, Associates
      Pages 405-412
  5. Back Matter
    Pages 413-423

About this book

Introduction

Attempting fonnally to evaluate something involves the evaluator coming to grips with a number of abstract concepts such as value, merit, worth, growth, criteria, standards, objectives, needs, nonns, client, audience, validity, reliability, objectivity, practical significance, accountability, improvement, process, pro­ duct, fonnative, summative, costs, impact, infonnation, credibility, and - of course - with the tenn evaluation itself. To communicate with colleagues and clients, evaluators need to clarify what they mean when they use such tenns to denote important concepts central to their work. Moreover, evaluators need to integrate these concepts and their meanings into a coherent framework that guides all aspects of their work. If evaluation is to lay claim to the mantle of a profession, then these conceptualizations of evaluation must lead to the conduct of defensible evaluations. The conceptualization of evaluation can never be a one-time activity nor can any conceptualization be static. Conceptualizations that guide evaluation work must keep pace with the growth of theory and practice in the field. Further, the design and conduct of any particular study involves a good deal of localized conceptualization.

Keywords

Abstract Experimental Design Hearing criticism education evaluation experiment growth objectivity profession

Bibliographic information

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6669-7
  • Copyright Information Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1983
  • Publisher Name Springer, Dordrecht
  • eBook Packages Springer Book Archive
  • Print ISBN 978-94-009-6671-0
  • Online ISBN 978-94-009-6669-7
  • Buy this book on publisher's site
Industry Sectors
Finance, Business & Banking