Controversy as News Discourse

  • Peter A.¬†Cramer

Part of the Argumentation Library book series (ARGA, volume 19)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
    Pages i-viii
  2. Peter A. Cramer
    Pages 1-23
  3. Peter A. Cramer
    Pages 25-39
  4. Peter A. Cramer
    Pages 75-137
  5. Peter A. Cramer
    Pages 139-175
  6. Peter A. Cramer
    Pages 177-190
  7. Back Matter
    Pages 191-203

About this book


This book presents a constitutive approach to controversy based on a discourse analysis of news texts, focusing on the role of journalists as participants who shape public controversy for readers. Drawing data from the Reuters Corpus, the project identifies formulas that journalists use in reporting controversy and draws conclusions about how these serve professional and textual functions and how they shape public controversy as a natural, historical, and pragmatic event. While the traditions of dialectic and rhetoric have focused on the prescriptive aim of training participants to resolve controversies in philosophical dialogue or public debate settings, this orientation has tended to preempt questions about where controversy is located and how it is shaped. This project contributes to descriptive, ethnographic research about controversy, using discourse analysis to address a problem in argumentation.


Anaphoric Formulas Argumentation Citations Communication Constitutive Attitudes Constructed Dialogue Controversiae Controversy Controversy Formulas Dialectic Dialogue Discourse Analysis Discourse Arts Distortive Attitudes Esphoric Formulas Homophoric Formulas Journalism Jurisdiction Non-phoric Formulas Philosophical Dialogues Public Debates Rhetoric Supportive Attitudes Witness Citations

Authors and affiliations

  • Peter A.¬†Cramer
    • 1
  1. 1., Department of EnglishSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Bibliographic information

Industry Sectors