© 2006

Artificial Immune Systems

5th International Conference, ICARIS 2006, Oeiras, Portugal, September 4-6, 2006. Proceedings

  • Hugues Bersini
  • Jorge Carneiro
Conference proceedings ICARIS 2006

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4163)

Table of contents

  1. Front Matter
  2. Computer Simulation of Classical Immunology

    1. Thiago Guzella, Tomaz Mota-Santos, Joaquim Uchôa, Walmir Caminhas
      Pages 9-22
    2. Catherine Beauchemin, Stephanie Forrest, Frederick T. Koster
      Pages 23-36
    3. F. Vistulo de Abreu, E. N. M. Nolte‘Hoen, C. R. Almeida, D. M. Davis
      Pages 37-51
    4. Christian Jacob, Scott Steil, Karel Bergmann
      Pages 52-65
  3. Computer Simulation of Idiotypic Network

    1. Holger Schmidtchen, Ulrich Behn
      Pages 81-94
    2. Krzysztof Trojanowski, Marcin Sasin
      Pages 95-108
    3. Emma Hart, Hugues Bersini, Francisco Santos
      Pages 109-121
  4. ImmunoInformatics Conceptual Papers

    1. Thomas Stibor, Jonathan Timmis, Claudia Eckert
      Pages 122-135
    2. Steve Cayzer, Jim Smith
      Pages 136-149
    3. Hugues Bersini
      Pages 150-163
    4. Paul S. Andrews, Jon Timmis
      Pages 164-177
    5. Werner Dilger
      Pages 178-192
  5. Pattern Recognition Type of Application

About these proceedings


ICARIS 2006 is the ?fth instance of a series of conferences dedicated to the comprehension and the exploitation of immunological principles through their translation into computational terms. All scienti?c disciplines carrying a name that begins with “arti?cial” (followed by “life,” “reality,” “intelligence” or “- munesystem”) aresimilarlysu?ering froma veryambiguousidentity.Their axis of research tries to stabilize an on-going identity somewhere in the crossroad of engineering (building useful artifacts), natural sciences (biologyor psychology— improving the comprehension and prediction of natural phenomena) and t- oretical computer sciences (developing and mastering the algorithmic world). Accordingly and depending on which of these perspectives receives more s- port, they attempt at attracting di?erent kinds of scientists and at stimul- ing di?erent kinds of scienti?c attitudes. For many years and in the previous ICARIS conferences, it was clearly the “engineering” perspective that was the most represented and prevailed through the publications. Indeed, since the o- gin of engineering and technology, nature has o?ered a reserve of inexhaustible inspirations which have stimulated the development of useful artifacts for man. Biology has led to the development of new computer tools, such as genetic - gorithms, Boolean and neural networks, robots learning by experience, cellular machines and others that create a new vision of IT for the engineer: parallel, ?exible andautonomous.Inthis type of informatics,complexproblemsareta- led with the aid of simple mechanisms, but in?nitely iterated in time and space.


AIS Mutation Simulation Spam artificial immune systems bioinformatics cognition immune networks immunocomputing modeling multi-objective optimization optimization pattern recognition robot theoretical i

Editors and affiliations

  • Hugues Bersini
    • 1
  • Jorge Carneiro
    • 2
  1. 1.IRIDIA, CoDEUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Instituto Gulbenkian de CienciaOeirasPortugal

Bibliographic information

Industry Sectors
Chemical Manufacturing
IT & Software
Consumer Packaged Goods
Materials & Steel
Finance, Business & Banking
Energy, Utilities & Environment
Oil, Gas & Geosciences