Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 102–106 | Cite as

Moving to a New Home: Will Anyone Live There and Who Will Know the Address?

  • Richard F. RakosEmail author
Article

Abstract

“An Academic Home for a Natural Science” argues that behavior analysis will only prosper as a science when it disassociates itselffrom psychology and identifies with “behaviorology.” In contrast, I demonstrate that over time behaviorism has made a marked and growing impact on mainstream psychology by remaining within psychology. The formation of a new discipline forfeits both psychology’s resources and social acceptance, rendering the new discipline scientifically and culturally irrelevant.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fraley, L. E. & Ledoux, S. F. (1997). Origins, status, and mission of behaviorology. In S.F. Ledoux, Origins and components of behaviorology (pp. 33–169). Canton, NY: ABCs.Google Scholar
  2. Franks, C. M. (1997). It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. Behavior. Therapy. 28. 389–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heward, W. L., & Malott, R. W. (1995). Introduction: How the happy few might become the competent many. The Behavior Analyst. 18. 69–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kazdin, A.E. (1978). History of behavior modification: Experimental foundations of contemporary research. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  5. McNamara, K. (1997). Current issues and practices in psychoeducational assessment. The Ohio Psychologist. 44, 29–3I.Google Scholar
  6. Nevid, J.S., Lavi, B., & Primavera, L. H. (1987). Principal components analysis of therapeutic orientations of doctoral programs in clinical psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 43. 723–729.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198711)43:6<723::AID-JCLP2270430614>3.0.CO;2-JCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sayette, M., & Mayne, T. (1990). Survey of current clinical and research trends in clinical psychology. American Psychologist. 45. 1263–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.1I.1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Skinner, B.F. (1983). Can the experimental analysis of behavior rescue psychology? The Behavior Analyst. 6. 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Skinner, B. F. (1986, May). We happy few. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association Behavior Analysis, Milwaukee, WI.Google Scholar
  10. Skinner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of the mind? American Psychologist. 45. 1206–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.1I.1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thyer, B. A. (1995). The X club and the secret ring: Lessons on how behavior analysis can take over psychology. The Behavior Analyst. 18. 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wilson, G. T. (1997) Behavior therapy at century close. Behavior Therapy. 28. 449–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(97)80094-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCleveland State UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations