Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 86–110 | Cite as

New myths and harsh realities: Reply to Paul on the Implications of Paul and Lentz (1977) for Generalization From Token Economies to Uncontrolled Environments

  • Jerome C. WakefieldEmail author
Reply

Abstract

As part of a larger argument about why token economy treatment for schizophrenia was largely abandoned despite demonstrated behavioral gains, I (Wakefield, 2006) analyzed Paul and Lentz’s (1977) classic study of social-learning treatment of schizophrenia, sometimes cited as the best in this field. I argued that it failed to demonstrate or even test generalization of gains to uncontrolled natural environments, a serious drawback in an age of deinstitutionalization. In his response, Paul (2006) rejects my contention and argues that there are three sources of data in the study that support generalization: gains were maintained during a no-treatment baseline at 4 years into the study, during an 18-month period following a change in aversive time out procedures for aggressive acts, and during the 18-month follow-up of patients released to community aftercare. In this reply, I examine Paul’s counterarguments and argue that the evidence strongly supports my original contention that Paul and Lentz’s study provides no support for generalization.

Keywords

schizophrenia behavioral treatment token economy generalization philosophy of science history of psychology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Glynn, S. M. (1990). Token economy approaches for psychiatric patients: Progress and pitfalls over 25 years. Behavior Modification, 14, 383–407.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455900144002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Liberman, R. P. (1980). A review of Paul and Lentz’s psychological treatment for chronic mental patients: Milieu versus social-learning programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 367–371.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1980.13-367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mariotto, M. J., Paul, G. L., & Licht, M. H. (2002). Assessment in inpatient and residential settings. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Clinical personality assessment: Practical approaches (2nd ed.) (pp. 466–490). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Paul, G.L. (Ed.). (1987). Observational assessment instrumentation for service and research–The Time-Sample Behavioral Checklist: Assessment in residential treatment settings, Part 2. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  5. Paul, G.L. (2000). Evidence-based practices in inpatient and residential facilities. The Clinical Psychologist, 53, 3–11.Google Scholar
  6. Paul, G. L. (2006). Myth and reality in Wakefield’s assertions regarding Paul and Lentz (1977). Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 244–252.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Paul, G.L, & Lentz, R.J. (1977). Psychosocial treatment of chronic mental patients: Milieu versus social-learning programs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Paul, G. L., & Menditto, A. A. (1992). Effectiveness of inpatient treatment programs for mentally ill adults in public psychiatric facilities. Applied & Preventive Psychology: Current Scientific Perspectives, 1, 41–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-1849(05)80133-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Paul, G. L., Stuve, P., & Menditto, A. A. (1997). Social-learning program (with token economy) for adult psychiatric patients. The Clinical Psychologist, 50, pp. 14–17.Google Scholar
  10. Paul, G.L., Tobias, L.L., & Holly, B.L. (1972). Maintenance psychotropic drugs in the presence of active treatment programs: A “triple-blind” withdrawal study with long-term mental patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 27, 106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750250092013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wakefield, J.C. (2006). Is behaviorism becoming a pseudo-science?: Power versus scientific rationality in the eclipse of token economies by biological psychiatry in the treatment of schizophrenia. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 202–221.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wakefield, J. C. (2007). Is behaviorism becoming a pseudoscience?: Replies to Drs. Wyatt, Midkiff and Wong. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 170–189.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v16i2.919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wilder, D. A., White, H, & Yu, M. L. (2003). Functional analysis and treatment of bizarre vocalizations exhibited by an adult with schizophrenia: A replication and extension. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wong, S. E. (2006a). Behavior analysis of psychotic disorders: Scientific dead end or casualty of the mental health political economy? Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 152–177.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.365
  15. Wong, S. E. (2006b). Response to the commentaries. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 232–243.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.390
  16. Wong, S. E. (2007) Scientific discovery, social change, and individual behavior change. Behavior and Social issues, 16, 190–196.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v16i2.1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wong, S. E., Martinez-Diaz, J. A., Massel, H. K., Edelstein, B. A., Wiegand, W., Bowen, L., & Liberman, R. P. (1993). Conversational skills training with schizophrenic inpatients: A study of generalization across settings and conversants. Behavior Therapy, 24, 285–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80270-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wyatt, W. J., & Midkiff, D. (2006a). Biological psychiatry: A practice in search of a science. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 132–151.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.372
  19. Wyatt, W. J., & Midkiff, D. (2006b). Six-to-one gets the job done: Comments on the reviews. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 222–231.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.388
  20. Wyatt, W. J., & Midkiff, D. M. (2007). Psychiatry’s thirty-five-year, non-empirical reach for biological explanations. Behavior and Social Issues, 16, 197–213.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v16i2.1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jerome C. Wakefield 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Silver School of Social WorkNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations