Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 8–19 | Cite as

Propensity to Report Intimate Partner Violence in Australia: Community Demographics

  • Tania SignalEmail author
  • Nicola Taylor


Intimate partner violence (IPV) has devastating consequences both for the individuals involved and the community more widely. The role of the community in the prevention of IPV has been noted both in the literature and in recent initiatives within Australia. Contingency-specifying stimuli like community attitudes towards both IPV and women have been suggested to contribute to the prevalence of IPV. Logically the success of any community-based initiative to reduce IPV rests upon individuals of that community being willing to report such violence. As such, there is a need to determine which variables may influence an individual’s willingness to report IPV. The aim of the current study was to examine demographic and attitudinal variables to ascertain their relationship with propensity to report. A telephone questionnaire resulted in 1208 valid responses from members of the general community. Results showed a number of variables which were related with report propensity including gender, age, income level and awareness of whom to report such incidents to. These variables and their implications are discussed.


family violence reporting propensity to report 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (1996). Women’s Safety Survey. Cat. no. 4128.0, Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, F., & French, L. (2004). Making the links: Child abuse, animal cruelty and domestic violence. Child Abuse Review, 13, 399–414. Scholar
  3. Bell, K. M., & Naugle, A. E. (2005). Understanding stay/leave decisions in violent relationships: A behaviour analytic approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 14, 21–45. Scholar
  4. Chermack, S., & Walton, M. (1999). The relationship between family aggression history and expressed aggression among college males. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 255–267.<255::AID-AB2>3.0.CO;2-UCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung, D., Kennedy, R., O’Brien, B., & Wendt, S. (2000). Home Safe Home: The link between domestic and family violence and women’s homelessness. Report produced for Partnerships Against Violence, Social Policy Research Group, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, H. L. (1994). Designing a behavioral program for a barrio in Tegucigalpa, Honduras. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 295–306. Scholar
  7. Douglas, H., & Godden, L. (2002). The decriminalisation of domestic violence: Possibilities for reform. Paper presented at Expanding Our Horizons: Understanding the Complexities of Violence Against Women. Downloaded from Scholar
  8. Fantuzzo, J. W., & Lindquist, C. U. (1989). The effects of observing conjugal violence on children: A review and analysis of research methodology. Journal of Family Violence, 4(1), 77–94. Scholar
  9. Farrimond, S. J., & Leland, Jr. L. S. (2006). Increasing donations to supermarket food-bank bins using proximal prompts. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 249–251. Scholar
  10. Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., & Hoskin, A. (1999). The victim-offender relationship and calling the Police in assaults. Criminology, 37(4), 931–947. Scholar
  11. Felson, R. B., Messner, S. F., Hoskin, A. W., & Deane, G. (2002). Reasons for reporting and not reporting domestic violence to the Police. Criminology, 40(3), 617–647. Scholar
  12. Felson, R.B., & Paré, P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assaults by nonstrangers to the Police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610. Scholar
  13. Fergusson, H. (2004). Protecting children in time. Hampshire: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fineman, M. A., & Mykitiuk, R. (1994). The public nature of private violence: The discovery of domestic abuse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Frisch, M. B., & Mackenzie, C. J. (1991). A comparison of formerly and chronically battered women on cognitive and situational dimensions. Psychotherapy, 28(2), 339–344. Scholar
  16. Gartner, R., & Macmillan, R. (1995). The effect of victim-offender relationship on reporting crimes of violence against women. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 19, 393–429.Google Scholar
  17. Griffith, S. M., Negy, C., & Chadee, D. (2006). Trinidadian and U.S. citizens attitudes toward domestic violence and their willingness to intervene: Does culture make a difference? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(6), 761–778. Scholar
  18. Holder, R. (2001). Domestic and family violence: Criminal justice interventions. Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearinghouse Issues Paper, No. 3.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, N. C., & Mathews, R. M. (1995). Using public feedback to increase contributions to a multipurpose senior center. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 449–455. Scholar
  20. Johnson, H. (2005). Crime victimisation in Australia: Key results of the 2004 International Crime Victimisation study. Australian Institute of Criminology Research & Public Policy Series, 64.Google Scholar
  21. Laing, L., & Bobic, N. (2002). Economic costs of domestic violence. Report produced for Partnerships Against Violence, Centre for Gender-Related Violence Studies, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
  22. Mukherjee, S., Carcach, C., & Higgins, K. (1997). Juvenile crime & justice: Australia. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  23. Mukherjee, S., & Dagger, D. (1990). The size of the crime problem in Australia (2nd Ed). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  24. Myers, D. L. (1995). Eliminating the battering of women by men: Some considerations for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(4), 493–507. Scholar
  25. O’Keefe, G., & Reed, K. (1990). Media public information campaigns and criminal justice policy. In R. Surrette (ed.). Media and Criminal Justice Policy. USA: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  26. Partnerships Against Domestic Violence. (2003). Phase 1 Meta-evaluation report: Community awareness and education to prevent, reduce and respond to domestic violence. Canberra: Office for the Status of Women.Google Scholar
  27. Partnerships Against Domestic Violence. (2004). The cost of domestic violence to the Australian economy. Canberra: Office for the Status of Women.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson, A., & Chandek, M. (2000). The domestic violence arrest decision: Examining demographic, attitudinal, and situational variables. Crime and Delinquency, 43, 104–118.Google Scholar
  29. Schlinger, H.D., & Blakely, E. (1994). A descriptive taxonomy of environmental operations and its implications for behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shernock, S. (2005). Third party roles in intimate partner violence incidents and their effects on Police response in a statewide rural jurisdiction. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 20(1), 22–39. Scholar
  31. Taylor, N. & Signal, T. D. (2006). Community demographics and the propensity to report animal cruelty. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 9(2), 201–210. Scholar

Copyright information

© Tania Signal & Nicola Taylor 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychology and SociologyCentral Queensland UniversityRockhamptonAustralia
  2. 2.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations