Advertisement

Behavior and Social Issues

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 214–220 | Cite as

Biologism is Behavior: A Commentary on Wong and Wyatt and Midkiff

  • Gareth I. HolmanEmail author
  • Robert J. Kohlenberg
Article

Abstract

In response to Wong (2006) and Wyatt and Midkiff (2006), we argue that behaviors related to biologism—i.e., believing that biological explanations are more explanatory than they really are—and other aspects of biological psychiatry are susceptible to behavior analysis, and we explore the possibility of such an analysis with special attention to the interests of clinicians and clinical researchers. We also propose that behavior analysis, biology, and science in general may best be served by the adoption and promotion of a more philosophically and scientifically rigorous view of the interaction between biological and behavioral factors. Such a view would promote rational integration rather than opposition of theoretical systems.

Keywords

biology behavior analysis antidepressant medication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikens, J.E., Nease, D.E., Nau, D.P., Klinkman, M.S., & Schwenk, T.L. (2005). Adherence to maintenance phase antidepressant medication as a function of patient beliefs about medication. Annals of Family Medicine, 3, 23–30.  https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.238
  2. Bolling, M.Y., & Kohlenberg, R.J. (2004). Reasons for quitting serotonin reuptake inhibitor therapy: Paradoxical psychological side effects and patient satisfaction. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 73, 80–85.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000080392
  3. Greene, J. (2003). From neural ‘is’ to moral ‘ought’: What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews, 4, 847–850.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1224
  4. Hayes, S.C. (1998). Resisting biologism. The Behavior Therapist, 19, 95–97.Google Scholar
  5. Hayes, S.C., Hayes, L.J., & Reese, H.W. (1988). Finding the philosophical core: A review of Stephen C. Pepper’s World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 97–111.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1988.50-97
  6. Hineline, P.N. (1990). The origins of environment-based psychological theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 305–320.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1990.53-305
  7. Phelan, J.C. (2002). Genetic bases of mental illness—a cure for stigma? Trends in Neurosciences, 25, 430–431.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02209-9
  8. Phelan, J.C., Yang, L.H., & Cruz-Rojas, R. (2006). Effects of attributing serious mental illnesses to genetic causes on orientations to treatment. Psychiatric Services, 57, 382–387.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.3.382
  9. Sieger, M., & Osmond, H. (1974). Models of madness, models of medicine. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. Skinner, B.F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York, NY: Bantam Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Skinner, B.F. (1976). Walden two. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Skinner, B.F. (1978). Reflections on behaviorism and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Wagner, A.W., Bystritsky, A., Russo, J.E., Craske, M.G., Sherbourne, C.D., Stein, M.B., & Roy-Byrne, P.P. (2005). Beliefs about psychotropic medication and psychotherapy among primary care patients with anxiety disorders. Depression and Anxiety, 21, 99–105.  https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20067
  14. Wong, S.E. (2006). Behavior analysis of psychotic disorders: Scientific dead end or casualty of the mental health political economy? Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 152–177.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.365
  15. Wyatt, J. & Midkiff, D.M. (2006). Biological psychiatry: A practice in search of a science. Behavior and Social Issues, 15, 132–151.  https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i2.372

Copyright information

© Gareth I. Holman & Robert J. Kohlenberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations