International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 28–39 | Cite as

Strategic group formation for carbon governance in Indonesia after the Indian Ocean tsunami 2004

Open Access
Article

Abstract

This article indentifies the carbon governance landscape after a complex and large-scale disaster by identifying the formation of new strategic groups and the utilization of resources policies. The article highlights the post-disaster context of land use, land-use change, and forestry (LULUCF). In particular it examines the power issue surrounding carbon management in Aceh Province, Indonesia, after the Indian Ocean tsunami (IOT) 2004. The author proposes a new institutional framework, namely the Strategic Framework for Sustainability Analysis (SFSA). The SFSA uses a series of strategic group analyses, combined with strategic resources identification and strategic policy to analyze LULUCF problems. The strategic groups in LULUCF are those that hold the decision-making power to discourage/encourage sustainability of local natural resources. Each group is assumed to reposition itself strategically in order to gain more control over resources. The IOT 2004 has led Aceh to exercise its own sustainability policies, which are set through many initiatives such as a moratorium on logging, a sustainable palm oil policy, livelihood-based carbon conservation projects, and green development policies, including disaster risk reduction.

Keywords

carbon governance Indian Ocean Tsunami LULUCF strategic groups sustainability 

References

  1. Adger, W. N., K. Brown, J. Fairbrass, A. Jordan, J. Paavola, S. Rosendo, and G. Seyfang. 2002. Governance for Sustainability: Towards a ‘Thick’ Understanding of Environmental Decision Making. Centre for Social and Economical Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia, CSERGE Working Paper, EDM. 02-04.Google Scholar
  2. Aceh Environmental Agency. 2007. Regional Environmental Status of 2007 (Status Lingkungan Hidup Daerah Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam Tahun 2007). Report of Pemerintah Provinsi Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam. December 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Amiruddin, Achdian, and O. S. Ishak. 2007. Aceh in Transition: Draft Future Scenario of Aceh 2007–2017. Banda Aceh: Aceh Civil Society Task Force ACSTF.Google Scholar
  4. Antariksa, B. 2008. Director of Walhi Aceh, Personal Interview. 13 August 2008.Google Scholar
  5. Blackett, H., and N. Irianto. 2007. Forest Resources and Forest Industries in Aceh. Research Report-FAO Forestry Programme for Early Rehabilitation in Asian Tsunami-Affected Countries.Google Scholar
  6. Budi. 2008. Executive Director of JKMA, Personal Interview. 26 July 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Corbera, E., K. Brown, and N. Adger. 2007. The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services. Development and Change 38 (4): 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbera, E., N. Kosoy, and M. Martınez. 2007. Equity Implications of Marketing Ecosystem Services in Protected Areas and Rural Communities: Case Studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 17 (3–4): 365–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CIFOR. 2008. Governance Definition. http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/about-us/how-we-work/forests-and-governance-programme.html.Google Scholar
  10. Evers, H. D., S. Gerke, and G. Menkhoff. 2006. Little Understood Knowledge Trap. Development and Cooperation 33 (6): 246–47.Google Scholar
  11. Evers, H. D., and S. Gerke. 2005. Knowledge is Power: Experts as Strategic Group. ZEF Working Paper 8a.Google Scholar
  12. --. 2009. Strategic Groups Analysis. ZEF Working Paper 34.Google Scholar
  13. Evers, H. D., and S. Benedikter. 2009. Strategic Group Formation in the Mekong Delta-The Development of a Modern Hydraulic Society. ZEF Working Paper 35.Google Scholar
  14. Evers, H. D., and T. Shield. 1990. Strategic Groups: Comparative Study on States, Bureaucracy and Class Formation in the Third World (Kelompok-Kelompok Strategis: Studi Perbandingan Tentang Negara, Birokrasi dan Pembentukan Kelas di Negara Dunia Ketiga). Yayasan Obor.Google Scholar
  15. Eye on Aceh. 2007. The ‘Golden’ Crop? Palm Oil in Post-Tsunami Aceh. Eye on Aceh Research Report. http://www.aceh-eye.org/data_files/english_format/ngo/ngo_eoa_2007_09_00.pdf.Google Scholar
  16. Fitzpatrick, D. 2007. Managing Conflict and Sustaining Recovery: Land Administration Reform in Tsunami Affected Aceh. Oxfam International Policy Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Harley, ed. 2008. Mukim from Time to Time (Mukim Dari Masa Ke Masa). Banda Aceh: JKMA.Google Scholar
  18. Hitchcock, P., and K. Meyers. 2006. Report on the IUCN-UNESCO World Heritage Monitoring Mission to the Tropical Rainforest Heritage Of Sumatra, Indonesia. 25 February–5 March 2006Google Scholar
  19. IUCN-UNESCO. 2007. Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra, Indonesia. Joint Reactive Monitoring Mission, 5–11 March 2007.Google Scholar
  20. Kaag, M. M. A., J. Brons, M. E. de Bruijn, J. W. M. van Dijk, L. J. de Haan, G. Nooteboom, and A. Zoomers. 2003. Poverty is Bad. Ways Forward in Livelihood Research. CERES Pathways of Development Seminar Paper, Utrecht, 6 February 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Khairani, A. 2008. Director of the Women Volunteers for Humanity (RPUK). Informal Conversation. 5 August 2008.Google Scholar
  22. de Koninck, R., S. Bernard, and M. Girard. 2007. Aceh’s Forests as an Asset for Reconstruction? First International Conference of Aceh and Indian Ocean Studies: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore and Rehabilitation Agency, Banda Aceh, Indonesia. 24–27 February 2007.Google Scholar
  23. Lesley, M. 2008. EOA Director. Personal interview, 15 August 2008.Google Scholar
  24. Llywellyn, S. 2007. Introducing the Agents. Organizational Studies 28 (2): 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarthy, J. 2000. “Wild Logging”: The Rise and Fall of Logging Networks and Biodiversity Conservation Projects on Sumatra’s Rainforest Frontier. Occasional Paper No. 31, CIFOR, Bogor.Google Scholar
  26. ——. 2002. Power and Interest on Sumatra’s Rainforest Frontier: Clientelist Coalitions, Illegal Logging and Conservation in the Alas Valley. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 33 (1): 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ——. 2005. Between Adat and State: Institutional Arrangements on Sumatra’s Forest Frontier. Human Ecology 33 (1): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ——. 2006. The Fourth Circle: A Political Ecology of Sumatra’s Rainforest Frontier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Modus Aceh. 2009. Criminalized Because of Chopping Trees in Their Own Garden. Modus Aceh, Seventh Edition, Year VII. 3 June 2009.Google Scholar
  30. Nababan, A., and Demos. 2007. Politization of Aceh Democracy: Towards A Meaningful Human Rights Based Democracy (Politisasi Demokrasi Aceh: Menuju Demokrasi Berbasis Hak Asasi Manusia Yang Bermakna). Executive report on the research on democracy in Aceh following the MoU signing in Helsinki. Banda Aceh: Demos.Google Scholar
  31. OCHA and MiSPI. 2005. Directory of Local NGOs in Aceh. February 2005 Edition.Google Scholar
  32. Pye, O. 2005. Forest Policy and Strategic Groups in Thailand. Internationales Asienforum 36 (3–4): 311–16.Google Scholar
  33. SIPIL. 2008. Palm Oil for the Orphan (Sawit Untuk Anak Yatim). 8th Edition, Year I, 15–30 July 2008.Google Scholar
  34. Syarif, S. M. 2003. Towards Sovereign Village and Hamlet (Menuju Kedaulatan Mukim dan Gampong: Riwang U Seunobok). Banda Aceh: Yayasan Rumpun Bambu.Google Scholar
  35. ——. 2008. Towards Gampong and Mukim Based Spatial Management in Aceh (Menuju Pengelolaan Kawasan Berbasis Gampong dan Mukim di Aceh Rayeuk). Banda Aceh: Yayasan Rumpun Bambu.Google Scholar
  36. Thorburn, C. 2001. Regime Change-Prospects for Community-Based Resource Management in Post-New Order Indonesia. Paper presented at the IASCP Inaugural Pacific Regional Meeting, 2–4 September 2001, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  37. ——. 2008. Village Government in Aceh, Three Years after the Tsunami. Paper CSEASWP1-08. Center for Southeast Asia Studies, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  38. Thorp, R., F. Stewart, and A. Heyer. 2005. When and How Far is Group Formation a Route Out of Chronic Poverty? World Development 33 (6): 907–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UNESCO. 2006. World Forest Heritage Monitoring Report. Joint IUCN — UNESCO Monitoring Mission, 25 February–5 March 2006. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/2006/mis1167-2006.pdf.Google Scholar
  40. --. 2007. World Forest Heritage Monitoring Report. Joint IUCN — UNESCO Reactive Monitoring mission, 5–11 March 2007. http://whc.unesco.org/document/8808.Google Scholar
  41. Walhi. 2007. WALHI Disagree Carbon Trading for Climate Change Mitigation. www.walhi.or.id/en.Google Scholar
  42. Zwick, S. 2008. Painting the Town REDD: Merrill Lynch Inks Massive Voluntary Forest Deal. The Ecosystem Marketplace, 8 Feb 2008. www.ecosystemmarketplace.com.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United Nations UniversityBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations