Advertisement

Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 73, Issue 2, pp 145–151 | Cite as

The Meanings of Physics Equations and Physics Education

  • Minchul Kim
  • Youngwook Cheong
  • Jinwoong SongEmail author
Review Articles
  • 168 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. JKPS 50th Anniversary Reviews

Abstract

Physics equation represents a relationship among symbols by modelling conceptual knowledge of physics mathematically. Teaching and learning the rich meanings of physics equations can enhance learners’ understanding of physics concepts. From this expectation, we introduced various discussions which categorised the meaning of the physics equation according to the semantic relationship between the related concepts and the function and status of the physics equation. The physics equations are classified into interaction relationship, state relationship, and causal relationship according to the semantic relationship among the concepts included in the equation. This classification is based on the distinction of several ontological categories. Physics equations are also divided into empirical laws, definitions and principles according to their function and conceptual status. This classification of equations can provide a basis for teaching and learning physics in-depth.

Keywords

Physics equation Physical meaning Mathematical meaning Ontological category Epistemological category 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. F. Redish and E. Kuo, Sci. Educ. 24, 561 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    B. L. Sherin, Cognition and Instruction 19, 479 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Kim and S. J. Pak, American Journal of Physics 70, 759 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    O. Uhden, R. Karam, M. Pietrocola and G. Pospiech, Sci. Educ. 21, 489 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    F. J. Rutherford, G. Holton and F. G. Watson, Project Physics (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    P. G. Hewitt, The Physics Teacher 49, 264 (2011).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. H. Kjeldsen and J. Lützen, Science & Education 24, 543 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Dugas, A History of Mechanics (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1988), p. 33.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Y. S. Kim and K. S. Im, The Introduction of Scientific History (Dasan, Seoul, 2011), p. 58.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. S. Westfall, The Construction of Modern Science (The Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1971), p. 152.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Losee, A historical introduction to the philosophy of science (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. T. Cushing, Philosophical concepts in physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. Z. Albert, Quantum mechanics and experience (Harvard University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. Walker, Halliday & Resnick Fundamentals of Physics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Jefferson City, 2011), p. 91.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. A. Serway and C. Vuille, College Physics (Brooks/Cole, Boston, 2012), p. 539.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. T. Chi, J. D. Slotta and N. De Leeuw, Learning and Instruction 4, 27 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. D. Slotta, M. T. Chi and E. Joram, Cognition and Instruction 13, 373 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    M. Reiner, J. D. Slotta, M. T. Chi and L. B. Resnick, Cognition and Instruction 18, 1 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. T. Chi, Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), S. Vosniadou, International handbook of research on conceptual change (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2008), p. 61.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Gupta, D. Hammer and E. F. Redish, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 19, 285 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    A. Gupta, A. Elby and L. D. Conlin, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 10, 010113 (2014).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Y. W. Cheong, Sci & Educ. 25, 611 (2016).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    D. T. Brookes and E. Etkina, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research 5, 010110 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. W. Jewett Jr., The Physics Teacher 46, 210 (2008).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    I. A. Halloun, Modeling Theory in Science Education (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006), p. 51.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    E. Etkina, A. Warren and M. Gentile, The Physics Teacher 44, 35 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    A. B. Arons, Teaching introductory physics (Wiley, New York, 1997), part III.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    M. Kim, Y. Cheong and J. Song, New Physics: Sae Mulli 66, 50 (2016).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    N. G. Lederman, F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell and R. S. Schwartz, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39, 497 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    W. F. McComas, M. P. Clough and H. Almazroa, The role and character of the nature of science. in The nature of science in science education rationales and strategies (Springer, Dordrecht, 2002), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    W. F. G. Swann, Am. J. Phys. 19, 182 (1951).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    C. B. Spurgin, Physics Education 19, 114 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    C. Kugler, The American Biology Teacher 64, 341 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Y. W. Cheong, Journal of Korean Association for Science Education 34, 459 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    N. R. Campbell, Physics: The Elements (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1920), p. 113.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    S. Toulmin, The philosophy of science (Hutchinson, London, 1953).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    R. N. Giere, Philosophy of Science 71, 742 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    S. Vosniadou, International handbook of research on conceptual change (Routledge, London, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    G. J. Posner, K. A. Strike, P. W. Hewson and W. A. Gertzog, Science education 66, 211 (1982).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    H. Poincaré, Science and hypothesis (The walter scott publishing CO., LTD, New York, 1905).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    M. Kim, Y. Cheong and J. Song, New Phys.: Sae Mulli 66, 61 (2016).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Department of Physics EducationGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuKorea
  3. 3.Center for Educational Research & Department of Physics EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations