Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 74, Issue 11, pp 1073–1078 | Cite as

Numerical Calculations of Multi-Channel Receiver Coil Array with High-Pass Spoke Coil for Parallel MRI

  • Han-Joong Kim
  • Phil Heo
  • Donghyuk Kim
  • Soobum Kim
  • Kyoung-Nam KimEmail author


The proposed study reports the design and testing of spoke coil (SC), that compensates for the degradation in the g-factor that is caused by the insufficient sensitivity of the coil array along the main magnetic field direction. Electromagnetic (EM) simulations were performed to evaluate the performance of the proposed coil in a 7-T MRI system. 25-channel surface loop array and short dipole array containing SC or circular loop coil (LC) on the top of the phantom are 3D modeled. The SENSE g-factor and SNR of coil arrays are calculated and evaluated, and the quality factor (Q), scaling factor (α), and noise-corelated resistance (R) are considered. The directed effective magnetic field (B1) generated by the SC improves the g-factor by compensating for the insufficient sensitivity information gathered by the array. However, this arrangement should be optimized to increase the available sensitivity information, depending on the type and structure of the coil elements in the array.


MRI SENSE g-factor EM simulation RF coil array Birdcage coil Spoke coil 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This work was supported by a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI). funded by the Ministry for Health and Welfare, Korea (HI14C1135) and supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by Korea Government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2014M3C7033998).


  1. [1]
    P. B. Roemer et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 16, 192 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. M. Wright and L. L. Wald, NMR Biomed. 10, 394 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. K. Sodickson and W. J. Manning, Magn. Reson. Med. 38, 591 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. P. Pruessmann, M. Weiger, M. B. Scheidegger and P. Boesiger, Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. A. Griswold et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 1202 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Weiger, K. P. Pruessmann and P. Boesiger, Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 14, 10 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    G. Chen, L. T. Muftuler, S. H. Ha and O. Nalcioglu, J. Magn. Reson. 186, 273 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Weiger et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 45, 495 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Y. Gao, W. Chen and X. Zhang, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 37, 1723 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. C. Wiggins et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 56, 216 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. Lattanzi et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 79, 1789 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    C. E. Hayes et al., J. Magn. Reson. 63, 622 (1985).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Pimmel and A. Briguet, Magn. Reson. Med. 24, 158 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    L. Mispelter, M. Lupu and A. Briguet, NMR Probeheads for Biophysical and Biomedical Experiments: Theoretical Principles & Practical Guidelines (Imperial College Press, London, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. H. Richmond, IEEE Trans. Antennas. Propag. 9, 515 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. B. King, S. M. Varosi and G. R. Duensing, Concepts Magn. Reson. Part B Magn. Reson. Eng. 29, 42 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Kumar, W. A. Edelstein and P. A. Bottomley, Magn. Reson. Med. 61, 1201 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. R. Rhodes, J. Franklin Inst. 302, 225 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Han-Joong Kim
    • 1
  • Phil Heo
    • 1
  • Donghyuk Kim
    • 1
  • Soobum Kim
    • 1
  • Kyoung-Nam Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Health Sciences and Technology, GAIHSTGachon UniversityIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations