Advertisement

Journal of the Korean Physical Society

, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp 33–39 | Cite as

Optical Diffraction in a Free-Electron Laser Oscillator with Two Electron Beams

  • Soon-Kwon Nam
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of the optical diffraction, the electron beam’s emittance, energy spreads, and the higher-order modes in a free-electron laser (FEL) oscillator have been analyzed by using two electron beams of different energies based on the proposed FEL facility which is to be operated in the far-infrared and the infrared regions. The three-dimensional (3D) effects in a free-electron laser oscillator due to the diffraction, the electron beam’s emittance, energy spreads, and higher-order modes were studied using an extended three-dimensional FEL code with two electron beams that we developed. The effects of the variation in the amplitude of the radiation on the electron beam’s emittance and energy spreads were also calculated in the case with optical diffraction for the multiparticle and the multi-pass numbers by using a new 3D code. The mode construction was studied on the higher-order modes of the wiggler for various optical diffraction parameters for determining the FEL’s performance, which is required for high-quality electron beam. The intensity of the radiation field for the higher order modes was highly sensitive to the diffraction parameter of B > 2.5, but was less sensitive to the emittance and the energy spread for B < 1.5 in the coupled two-beam oscillator.

Keywords

Radiation intensity Diffraction Two-beam 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Nam and K. Kim, J. Plasma Phys. 77, 257 (2010).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    P. Sprangle, C. M. Tang and W. M. Manheimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1932 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    X. J. Wang, T. Watanabe, Y. Shen, R. K. Li, J. B. Murphy, T. Tsang and H. P. Freund, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 181115 (2007).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. H. Yu, S. Krinski and R. Gluckstern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 3011 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    B. Faatz, R. W. B. Best, D. Oepts and P. W. van Amersfoort, Pure Appl. Opt. 2, 195 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. A. Barnett, S. V. Benson and J. M. Madey, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 479 (1993).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    B. W. J. McNeil, G. R. M. Robb and M. W. Poole, Phys. Rev. E 70, 035501 (2004).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Xie, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A 445, 59 (2000).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    R. Bonifacio, C. Pelligrini and L. M. Narducci, Opt. Commun. 50, 373 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Bonifacio and B. W. J. McNeil, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A 272, 280 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Reiche, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res., Sect. A 429, 243 (1999).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    P. Wu and B. Lu, Optik. 113, 245 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    X. Yang, M. Li, Z. Xu, X. Shu and Y. Dou, in Proceedings of FEL (Nara, Japan, 2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean Physical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKangwon National UniversityChunchonKorea

Personalised recommendations