Within-session dynamics of categorical and memory mechanisms in pigeons

Abstract

The current experiments used categorical mid-session reversal (MSR) to examine how eight pigeons utilized categorical and item-specific mechanisms to learn and solve a novel variation of this task. Employing a fixed order of trial-unique pictorial items from two categories (flowers and cars) on each simultaneous discrimination trial, categorical and item-specific information was available during each session’s 80 trials. Choices to one category were rewarded for the first 40 trials, after which the correct category was reversed (e.g., car correct early → flower correct late). This procedure selectively impacts the time-modulated utility of categorical identification, but leaves exclusively item-specific information intact. Results revealed that categorical control emerged rapidly and before item-specific memorization, which came after extended experience. Both types of control occurred within a session, with control modulated by their time-based relative utility. The implications for the timing, ordering, and attention by animals to categorical and item-specific information is considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Ashby, F. G. (Ed.) (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

  2. Ashby, F. G., Alfonso-Reese, L. A., Turken, A. U., & Waldron, E. M. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning. Psychological Review, 105(3), 442-481. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenowitz, E. A., & Beecher, M. D. (2005). Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges. Trends in Neurosciences, 28(3), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2005.01.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cook, R. G., Brown, M. F., & Riley, D. A. (1985). Flexible memory processing by rats: Use of prospective and retrospective information in the radial maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11(3), 453-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.11.3.453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cook, R. G., Levison, D. G., Gillett, S. R., & Blaisdell, A. P. (2005). Capacity and limits of associative memory in pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 350-358. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, R. G., & Rosen, H. A. (2010). Temporal control of internal states in pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 915-922. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cook, R. G., & Smith, J. D. (2006). Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1059-1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01833.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Daniel, T. A., Cook, R. G., & Katz, J. S. (2015). Temporal dynamics of task switching and abstract-concept learning in pigeons. Frontiers in psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01334

  9. Fagot, J., & Cook, R. G. (2006). Evidence for large long-term memory capacities in baboons and pigeons and its implication for learning and the evolution of cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103, 17564-17567. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605184103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. George, D. N., & Pearce, J. M. (2012). A configural theory of attention and associative learning. Learning & Behavior, 40(3), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-012-0078-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibson, B. M., & Wasserman, E. A. (2004). Time-course of control by specific stimulus features and relational cues during same-different discrimination training. Learning & Behavior, 32, 183-189. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science, 146(3643), 549-551. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.146.3643.549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2006). Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32(1), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Minda, J. P., & Smith, J. D. (2000). Prototypes in category learning. The effects of category size, category structure, and stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 775-779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mottron, L., Dawson, M., & Soulières, I. (2009). Enhanced perception in savant syndrome: patterns, structure and creativity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1385-1391. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nosofsky, R. M. (1987). Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.13.1.87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qadri, M. A. J., Ashby, F. G., Smith, J. D., & Cook, R. G. (2019). Testing analogical rule transfer in pigeons (Columba livia). Cognition, 183, 256-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rayburn-Reeves, R. M., & Cook, R. G. (2016). The organization of behavior over time: Insights from mid-session reversal. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 11, 103-125. https://doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2016.110006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rayburn-Reeves, R. M., Qadri, M. A. J., Brooks, D. I., Keller, A. M., & Cook, R. G. (2017). Dynamic cue use in pigeon mid-session reversal. Behavioural Processes, 137, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, J. D., Ashby, F. G., Berg, M. E., Murphy, M. S., Spiering, B., Cook, R. G., & Grace, R. C. (2011). Pigeons' categorization may be exclusively nonanalytic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 414-421. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0047-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Smith, J. D., & Minda, J. P. (1998). Prototypes in the mist: The early epochs of category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1411-1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.6.1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sol, D., Timmermans, S., & Lefebvre, L. (2002). Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Animal Behaviour, 63(3), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vicari, S., Bellucci, S., & Carlesimo, G. A. (2005). Visual and spatial long-term memory: differential pattern of impairments in Williams and Down syndromes. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47(5), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012162205000599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0097-7403.14.3.235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zakrzewski, A. C., Church, B. A., & Smith, J. D. (2018). The transfer of category knowledge by macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 132(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert G. Cook.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Practices Statement

This experiment was not preregistered. The materials and data are available upon request from the corresponding author at Robert.Cook@tufts.edu.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cook, R.G., Rayburn-Reeves, R.M. & Qadri, M.A.J. Within-session dynamics of categorical and memory mechanisms in pigeons. Psychon Bull Rev (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01842-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Categorization
  • Memorization
  • Cognitive flexibility
  • Pigeons