Recognition-induced forgetting, whereby the recognition of targeted memories induces the forgetting of related memories, results from the recognition of old objects and rejection of new objects. Here we asked whether both these tasks are necessary to induce forgetting. Our unique design allowed us to isolate the recognition of old objects from the rejection of new objects by presenting subjects with only new objects, only old objects, and a mixture of both in separate conditions of an old–new recognition task. In all three conditions, we successfully induced forgetting. The magnitude of forgetting was statistically indistinguishable across all three conditions, showing that recognition of old objects and rejection of new objects are each building blocks of forgetting. These findings pinpoint both recognition and rejection as mechanisms underlying recognition-induced forgetting and demonstrate the ubiquity of this forgetting effect.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
To preview the results, we found a general effect across the confidence scale (see ROC curves, Fig. 3) and were then able to collapse across confidence ratings for hit rate analyses.
When we compared the performance for baseline items, there was a statistically significant effect such that the baseline memory performance (i.e., corrected recognition performance) was best for baseline objects in the all-old category, followed by mixed category and then all-new category. This was the case for both experiments. This suggests that the type of retrieval practice (i.e., all-old, mixed, or all-new) had a category-specific effect that propagated to baseline items. More precisely making more ‘old’ judgments helped memory performance for the baseline items from the same object category. This makes it inappropriate to collapse across all baseline items, and therefore justifies using category-specific baseline comparisons.
Further to anticipate our results, we found statistically indistinguishable forgetting in all three conditions, suggesting that the results are not due to subjects shifting response criterion across conditions.
Anderson, M. C. (2003). Rethinking interference theory: Executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 415–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2003.08.006
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Feenan, K., & Snodgrass, J. G. (1990). The effect of context on discrimination and bias in recognition memory for pictures and words. Memory & Cognition, 18(5), 515–527. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198484
Jonker, T. R., Seli, P., & MacLeod, C. M. (2013). Putting retrieval-induced forgetting in context: An inhibition-free, context-based account. Psychological Review, 120(4), 852–872. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034246
Kim, G., Lewis-Peacock, J. A., Norman, K. A., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2014). Pruning of memories by context-based prediction error. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(24), 8997–9002.
Lewis-Peacock, J. A., & Norman, K. A. (2014). Competition between items in working memory leads to forgetting. Nature Communications, 5(1), 5768. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6768
Maxcey, A. M. (2016). Recognition-induced forgetting is not due to category-based set size. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(1), 187–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1007-1
Maxcey, A. M., & Bostic, J. (2015). Activating learned exemplars in children impairs memory for related exemplars in visual long-term memory. Visual Cognition, 23(5), 643–558. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1064052
Maxcey, A. M., Bostic, J., & Maldonado, T. (2016). Recognition practice results in a generalizable skill in older adults: Decreased intrusion errors to novel objects belonging to practiced categories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(4), 643–649. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3236
Maxcey, A. M., Dezso, B., Megla, E., & Schneider, A. (2019a). Unintentional forgetting is beyond cognitive control. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-019-0180-5
Maxcey, A. M., Glenn, H., & Stansberry, E. (2018). Recognition-induced forgetting does not occur for temporally grouped objects unless they are semantically related. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(3), 1087–1103. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1302-z
Maxcey, A. M., Janakiefski, L., Megla, E., Smerdell, M., & Stallkamp, S. (2019b). Modality-specific forgetting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(2), 622–633.
Maxcey, A. M., & Woodman, G. F. (2014). Forgetting induced by recognition of visual images. Visual Cognition, 22(6), 789–808.
Murayama, K., Miyatsu, T., Buchli, D., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence of retrieval: A meta-analytic review of retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Bulletin, 140(5), 1383–1409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037505
Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Jakab, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 98–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.002
Rugo, K. F., Tamler, K. N., Woodman, G. F., & Maxcey, A. M. (2017). Recognition-induced forgetting of faces in visual long-term memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(7), 1878–1885. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1419-1
Scotti, P. S., Janakiefski, L., & Maxcey, A. M. (2020). Recognition-induced forgetting of thematically-related pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01693-8
Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A., & Nestojko, J. F. (2006). Is retrieval success a necessary condition for retrieval-induced forgetting? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(6), 1023–1027. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213919
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1341–1354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-73184.108.40.2061
Yonelinas, A. P., & Parks, C. M. (2007). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 800–832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800
Conflict of interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fukuda, K., Pall, S., Chen, E. et al. Recognition and rejection each induce forgetting. Psychon Bull Rev 27, 520–528 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01714-x
- Retrieval-induced forgetting
- Recognition-induced forgetting
- Long-term memory
- Recognition memory
- Visual long-term memory