The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction

Abstract

Theories of skilled performance that emphasize training history, such as K. Anders Ericsson and colleagues’ deliberate-practice theory, have received a great deal of recent attention in both the scientific literature and the popular press. Twin studies, however, have demonstrated evidence for moderate-to-strong genetic influences on skilled performance. Focusing on musical accomplishment in a sample of over 800 pairs of twins, we found evidence for gene–environment correlation, in the form of a genetic effect on music practice. However, only about one quarter of the genetic effect on music accomplishment was explained by this genetic effect on music practice, suggesting that genetically influenced factors other than practice contribute to individual differences in music accomplishment. We also found evidence for gene–environment interaction, such that genetic effects on music accomplishment were most pronounced among those engaging in music practice, suggesting that genetic potentials for skilled performance are most fully expressed and fostered by practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Briley, D. A., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2013). Explaining the increasing heritability of cognitive ability across development: A meta-analysis of longitudinal twin and adoption studies. Psychological Science, 24, 1704–1713.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature–nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101, 568–586. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.568

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Coon, H., & Carey, G. (1989). Genetic and environmental determinants of musical ability in twins. Behavior Genetics, 19, 183–193.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. de Garay, A. L., Levine, L., & Carter, J. E. L. (1974). Genetic and anthropological studies of Olympic athletes. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.). (2006). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ericsson, K. A. (2007). Deliberate practice and the modifiability of body and mind: Toward a science of the structure and acquisition of expert and elite performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38, 4–34.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001

  8. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Galton, F. (1869). Hereditary genius. New York, NY: Macmillan & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2007). The role of domain-specific practice, handedness, and starting age in chess. Developmental Psychology, 43, 159–172. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.1.159

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hambrick, D. Z., Oswald, F. L., Altmann, E. M., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Deliberate practice: Is that all it takes to become an expert? Intelligence, 45, 34–45. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Loehlin, J. C., & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, environment, and personality: A study of 850 sets of twins.

  13. Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science.

  14. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nichols, R. C., & Bilbro, W. C. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genetica et Statistica Medica, 16, 265–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., & Loehlin, J. C. (1977). Genotype–environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 309–322. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.2.309

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Prescott, C. A. (2004). Using the Mplus computer program to estimate models for continuous and categorical data from twins. Behavior Genetics, 34, 17–40.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rutter, M. (2007). Gene–environment interdependence. Developmental Science, 10, 12–18.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schneider, W., Bös, K., & Rieder, H. (1993). Leistungsprognose bei jugendlichen Spitzensportlern [Performance prediction in young top athletes]. Aufmerksamkeit und energetisierung. Facetten von Konzentration und Leistung, 277–299.

  20. Tucker-Drob, E. M., Briley, D. A., & Harden, K. P. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences on cognition across development and context. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 349–355.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vinkhuyzen, A. A., Van der Sluis, S., Posthuma, D., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009). The heritability of aptitude and exceptional talent across different domains in adolescents and young adults. Behavior Genetics, 39, 380–392.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (Revised ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Download references

Author note

E.M.T.-D. and D.Z.H. jointly developed the study concept and drafted the paper. The data analysis was performed by E.M.T.-D. E.M.T.-D. was supported by National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Grant No. R21-HD069772. The Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin is supported by NICHD Grant No. R24-HD042849.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Z. Hambrick.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 Parameter estimates for alternative bivariate models of practice and music accomplishment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hambrick, D.Z., Tucker-Drob, E.M. The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction. Psychon Bull Rev 22, 112–120 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0671-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Music
  • Talent
  • Genetics
  • Skill
  • Individual differences