Young, Clark, Goffus, and Hoane (Learning and Motivation, 40(2), 160–177, 2009) documented significant advantages of linear and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling in the analysis of Morris water maze data. However, they also noted a caution regarding the impact of the common practice of ending a trial when the rat had not reached the platform by a preestablished deadline. The present study revisits their conclusions by considering a new approach that involves multilevel (i.e., mixed effects) censored generalized linear regression using Bayesian analysis. A censored regression explicitly models the censoring created by prematurely ending a trial, and the use of generalized linear regression incorporates the skewed distribution of latency data as well as the nonlinear relationships this can produce. This approach is contrasted with a standard multilevel linear and nonlinear regression using two case studies. The censored generalized linear regression better models the observed relationships, but the linear regression created mixed results and clearly resulted in model misspecification.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aarts, E., Verhage, M., Veenvliet, J. V., Dolan, C. V., & van der Sluis, S. (2014). A solution to dependency: Using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 491–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3648
Andersen, C. R., Wolf, J., Jennings, K., Prough, D. S., & Hawkins, B. E. (in press). Accelerated failure time survival model to analyze Morris water maze latency data. Journal of Neurotrauma. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2020.7089.
Bürkner, P. C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian generalized linear mixed models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01
Bürkner, P. C. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2018-017
Cooper, T., Liew, A., Andrle, G., Cafritz, T., Dallas, H., Niesen, T., Slater, E., … Mendelson, J., III. (2019). Latency in problem solving as evidence for learning in varanid and helodermatid lizards, with comments on foraging techniques. Copeia, 107(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-18-119
Dixon, P. (2008). Models of accuracy in repeated-measures design. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.004
Faes, C., Aerts, M., Geys, H., & De Schaepdrijver, L. (2010). Modeling spatial learning in rats based on Morris water maze experiments. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 9(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.361
Franck, C. T., Koffarnus, M. N., McKerchar, T. L., & Bickel, W. K. (2019). An overview of Bayesian reasoning in the analysis of delay-discounting data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 111(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.504
Gelman, A. (2004). Parameterization and Bayesian modeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99(466), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214504000000458
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC.
Jahn-Eimermacher, A., Lasarzik, I., & Raber, J. (2011). Statistical analysis of latency outcomes in behavioral experiments. Behavioral Brain Research, 221(1), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.007
Kruschke, J. K. (2014). Doing Bayesian data analysis. Elsevier.
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018). Bayesian data analysis for newcomers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1
Ntzoufras, I. (2011). Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. Hoboken, NJ.: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470434567
Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24–36.
Ulrich, R., & Miller, J. (1994). Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(1), 34–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34184.108.40.206.
Young, M. E. (2016). The problem with categorical thinking by psychologists. Behavioural Processes, 123, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.09.009
Young, M. E. (2017). Discounting: A practical guide to multilevel analysis of indifference data. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 108(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.265
Young, M. E. (2019). Bayesian data analysis as a tool for behavior analysts. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 111(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.512
Young, M. E., Clark, M. H., Goffus, A., & Hoane, M. R. (2009). Mixed effects modeling of Morris water maze data: Advantages and cautionary notes. Learning and Motivation, 40(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2008.10.004
Research reported in this publication was supported by the Cognitive and Neurobiological Approaches to Plasticity (CNAP) Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) of the National Institutes of Health under Grant Number P20GM113109.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Young, M.E., Hoane, M.R. Mixed effects modeling of Morris water maze data revisited: Bayesian censored regression. Learn Behav (2021). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-020-00457-y
- Morris water maze
- Data analysis
- Censored regression
- Bayesian analysis