Working memory is thought to be divided into distinct visual and verbal subsystems. Studies of visual working memory frequently use verbal working memory tasks as control conditions and/or use articulatory suppression to ensure that visual load is not transferred to verbal working memory. Using these verbal tasks relies on the assumption that the verbal working memory load will not interfere with the same processes as visual working memory. In the present study, participants maintained a visual or verbal working memory load as they simultaneously viewed scenes while their eye movements were recorded. Because eye movements and visual working memory are closely linked, we anticipated the visual load would interfere with scene-viewing (and vice versa), while the verbal load would not. Surprisingly, both visual and verbal memory loads interfered with scene-viewing behavior, while eye movements during scene-viewing did not significantly interfere with performance on either memory task. These results suggest that a verbal working memory load can interfere with eye movements in a visual task.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 298–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34184.108.40.2068
Anliker, L. (1976). Eye movements: On-line measurement, analysis, and control. In R. A. Monty & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes (pp. 185–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation Vol. 8, 47–90. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Bae, G.-Y., & Luck, S. J. (2018). What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted? British Journal of Psychology, 110, 268–287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12339
Bahle, B., Beck, V. M., & Hollingworth, A. (2018). The architecture of interaction between visual working memory and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 992–1011.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
Buetti, S., & Lleras, A. (2016). Distractibility is a function of engagement, not task difficulty: Evidence from a new oculomotor capture paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1382–1405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000213
Castelhano, M. S., Mack, M., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Viewing task influences eye movement control during active scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3):6.1–15.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
Cronin, D. A., & Irwin, D. E. (2018). Visual working memory supports perceptual stability across saccadic eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(11), 1739–1759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000567
de Fockert, J. W. (2013). Beyond perceptual load and dilution: A review of the role of working memory in selective attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(287), 1–12.
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2007). Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), 142–147.
Hardman, K. O., Vergauwe, E., & Ricker, T. J. (2017). Categorical working memory representations are used in delayed estimation of continuous colors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 30–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000290
Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(4), 936–949. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.936
Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 163–181.
Irwin, D. E. (1992a). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 307–317.
Irwin, D. E. (1992b). Perceiving an integrated visual world. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 121–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kiyonaga, A., & Egner, T. (2013). Working memory as internal attention: Toward an integrative account of internal and external processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(2), 228–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0359-y
Lavie, N., & de Fockert, J.W. (2005). The role of working memory in attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 669–674. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196756
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., de Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339–354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34220.127.116.119
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279– 281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/36846
Mack, A. & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Makovski, T., Shim, W. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2006). Interference from filled delays on visual change detection. Journal of Vision, 6, 1459–1470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/6.12.11
Menneer, T., Cave, K.R., Kaplan, E., Stroud, M.J., Chang, J., & Donnelly, N. (2019). The relationship between working memory and the dual-target cost in visual search guidance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45(7), 911–935. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000643
Morey, C. C., & Bieler, M. (2013). Visual short-term memory always requires general attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 163–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0313-z
Morey, C. C., & Cowan, N. (2004). When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(2), 296–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196573
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. H. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12(1), 9–17.
Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J Gibson (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neisser, U., & Becklen, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90019-5
Peterson, D. J., Decker, R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2019). Further studies on the role of attention and stimulus repetition in item–item binding processes in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 45(1), 56–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000577
Ricker, T. J., Cowan, N., & Morey, C. C. (2010). Visual working memory is disrupted by covert verbal retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 516–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.4.516
Saults, J. S., & Cowan, N. (2007). A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 663–684. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3418.104.22.1683
Schmidt, B. K., Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2002). Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(5), 754–763.
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.
Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R. A. (1996). Dissociating verbal and spatial working memory using PET. Cerebral Cortex, 6(1), 11–20.
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(3), 730–757. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1522.214.171.1240
Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Stressing the mind: The effect of cognitive load and articulatory suppression on attentional guidance from working memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(5), 924–934.
Tas, A. C., Luck, S. J., & Hollingworth, A. (2016). The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1121–1138.
Tsubomi, H., Fukuda, K., Watanabe, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2013). Neural limits to representing objects still within view. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(19), 8257–8263. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-12.2013
Vergauwe, E., Barroillet, P., & Camos, V. (2010). Do mental processes share a domain-general resource? Psychological Science, 21(3), 384–390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610361340
Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(5), 2020–2045. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000014
Open practices statement
Data and materials for this experiment are available upon request. This study was not preregistered.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This research was supported by a grant from the National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01EY027792. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
About this article
Cite this article
Cronin, D.A., Peacock, C.E. & Henderson, J.M. Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing. Atten Percept Psychophys (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02076-1
- Eye movements
- Visual working memory
- Verbal working memory