When multistable displays—stimuli that are compatible with several comparably likely perceptual interpretations—are presented intermittently, the perceptual state at the stimulus onset shows a complex dependence on the duration of the preceding blank interval. Specifically, perception is maximally destabilized for interruptions that are approximately 500 ms long, but it is stabilized by the use of shorter or longer blank intervals. This nonmonotonic dependence of perceptual stability on the blank interval duration raises questions about a number of history effects that are involved and about their nature, including the underlying neural representations. One way to characterize history effects is by looking at their specificity to the change of display properties. Here we measured the shape specificity for perception of the kinetic-depth effect when interruptions were brief (50 ms). For this time interval, perception is thought to be stabilized by neural persistence, a lingering trace of the prior neural activity. We found that perceptual stability depended on the shapes of the objects presented both before and after the break, but not on the similarity between the objects. These results matched earlier reports of the shape specificity of neural adaptation (destabilizing aftereffect for blanks 200–800 ms long). However, our results were markedly different from the shape specificity of sensory memory of multistable perception (a stabilizing effect for blanks > 800–1,000 ms). We concluded that whereas neural persistence and adaptation both act on the same motion-selective neural representation, sensory memory depends on another, possibly partially overlapping, shape-selective neural ensemble.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Barton, K. (2019). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=MuMIn
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Blake, Sobel, & Gilroy (2003). Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations. Neuron, 39, 869–878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00495-1
Brascamp, J. W., Knapen, T. H. J., Kanai, R., Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2008). Multi-timescale perceptual history resolves visual ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 3, e1497. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001497
Brascamp, J. W., Knapen, T. H. J., Kanai, R., van Ee, R., & van den Berg, A. V. (2007). Flash suppression and flash facilitation in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 7(12), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.12.12
Brouwer, G. J., & van Ee, R. (2007). Visual cortex allows prediction of perceptual states during ambiguous structure-from-motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1015–1023. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4593-06.2007
Clifford, C. W. G., Webster, M. A., Stanley, G. B., Stocker, A. A., Kohn, A., Sharpee, T. O., & Schwartz, O. (2007). Visual adaptation: Neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vision Research, 47, 3125–3131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.023
Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 183–228. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204258
de Jong, M. C., Knapen, T. H. J., & van Ee, R. (2012). Opposite influence of perceptual memory on initial and prolonged perception of sensory ambiguity. PLoS ONE, 7, e30595. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030595
Dodd, J. V, Krug, K., Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (2001). Perceptually bistable three-dimensional figures evoke high choice probabilities in cortical area MT. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 4809–4821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-13-04809.2001
Eriksen, C. W., & Collins, J. F. (1967). Some temporal characteristics of visual pattern perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 476–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024765
Ferber, S., Humphrey, G. K., & Vilis, T. (2003). The lateral occipital complex subserves the perceptual persistence of motion-defined groupings. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 716–721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/13.7.716
Hupé, J.-M., & Rubin, N. (2003). The dynamics of bi-stable alternation in ambiguous motion displays: a fresh look at plaids. Vision Research, 43, 531–548. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00593-X
Irwin, D. E., & Thomas, L. E. (2008). Visual sensory memory. In S. J. Luck & A. R. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 9–41). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Jiang, X., Jiang, Y., & Parasuraman, R. (2014). What you see depends on what you saw, and what else you saw: The interactions between motion priming and object priming. Vision Research, 105, 77–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.023
Klink, P. C., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., Brouwer, G. J., Noest, A. J., & van Wezel, R. J. A. (2008). Early interactions between neuronal adaptation and voluntary control determine perceptual choices in bistable vision. Journal of Vision, 8(5), 16:1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/8.5.16
Knapen, T. H. J., Brascamp, J. W., Adams, W. J., & Graf, E. W. (2009). The spatial scale of perceptual memory in ambiguous figure perception. Journal of Vision, 9(13), 16:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1167/9.13.16
Kornmeier, J., & Bach, M. (2004). Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: Evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. Psychophysiology, 41, 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00126.x
Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. N. (1999). Multistable phenomena: Changing views in perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 254–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-661301332-7
Leopold, D. A., Wilke, M., Maier, A., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 605–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nn851
Loftus, G. R., & Irwin, D. E. (1998). On the relations among different measures of visible and informational persistence. Cognitive Psychology, 35, 135–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0678
Maier, A., Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2003). Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns. Current Biology, 13, 1076–1085. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-982200414-7
McRae, K., Butler, B. E., & Popiel, S. J. (1987). Spatiotopic and retinotopic components of iconic memory. Psychological Research, 49, 221–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309030
Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2012). Advanced statistical methods for the analysis of large data-sets. In A. Di Ciaccio, M. Coli, & J. M. Angulo Ibanez (Eds.), BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. Berlin, Germany: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21037-2
Noest, A. J., van Ee, R., Nijs, M. M., & van Wezel, R. J. A. (2007). Percept-choice sequences driven by interrupted ambiguous stimuli: a low-level neural model. Journal of Vision, 7(8), 10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/7.8.10
O’Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1984). Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 36, 266–276. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206368
Orban, G. A. (2011). The extraction of 3D shape in the visual system of human and nonhuman primates. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 361–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113819
Pastukhov, A. (2016). Perception and the strongest sensory memory trace of multi-stable displays both form shortly after the stimulus onset. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 674–684. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-1004-4
Pastukhov, A., & Braun, J. (2008). A short-term memory of multi-stable perception. Journal of Vision, 8(13), 7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/8.13.7
Pastukhov, A., Füllekrug, J., & Braun, J. (2013). Sensory memory of structure-from-motion is shape-specific. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1215–1229. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0471-8
Pastukhov, A., Lissner, A., & Braun, J. (2014). Perceptual adaptation to structure-from-motion depends on the size of adaptor and probe objects, but not on the similarity of their shapes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 473–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0567-1
Pastukhov, A., Prasch, J., & Carbon, C.-C. (2018). Out of sight, out of mind: Occlusion and eye closure destabilize moving bistable structure-from-motion displays. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80, 1193–1204. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1505-z
Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. G. W. (2004). Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry. Journal of Vision, 4, 196–202. https://doi.org/10:1167/4.3.6
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., . . . Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://dx.www.r-project.org/
Song, C., & Yao, H. (2009). Duality in binocular rivalry: distinct sensitivity of percept sequence and percept duration to imbalance between monocular stimuli. PLoS ONE, 4, e6912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006912
Tong, F., Meng, M., & Blake, R. (2006). Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 502–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.09.003
van Boxtel, J. J. A., Alais, D., Erkelens, C. J., & van Ee, R. (2008). The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry. PLoS ONE, 3, e1429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001429
Vanduffel, W., Fize, D., Peuskens, H., Denys, K., Sunaert, S., Todd, J. T., & Orban, G. A. (2002). Extracting 3D from motion: differences in human and monkey intraparietal cortex. Science, 298, 413–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1073574
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Pastukhov, A., Burkel, K. & Carbon, C. Shape specificity of neural persistence for the kinetic-depth effect matches perceptual adaptation but not sensory memory. Atten Percept Psychophys 82, 1942–1948 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01954-7
- 3-D perception
- Depth and shape from X
- Binocular vision
- Rivalry/Bistable perception