We examined how the strength of the Shepard illusion develops with age in typically developing children. To this end, we recruited children between the ages of 6 and 14 years and quantified the degree to which they experienced the illusion. The strength of the illusion increased with age – reaching adult levels by 11.5 years. We also measured abilities in size and shape discrimination, receptive language, and abstract reasoning to determine if changes in illusion strength were also associated with these factors. Abilities in size and shape matching increased with age but did not correlate with the strength of the Shepard illusion. Receptive language and abstract reasoning increased with age and correlated with the strength of the Shepard illusion. However, a multiple regression analysis revealed that they did not contribute beyond their shared variance with age. Based on these findings, we propose that the illusion has a strong acquired component to it and requires the maturation of high-level processes before it is experienced to adult levels at preadolescence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Correlating these normalised scores with the absolute perceived differences between the two parallelograms yielded a strong Pearson correlation coefficient (r(95) = .973, p < .001), validating the use of the normalised scores.
The size-weight illusion pertains to the perceptual phenomenon in which the smaller of two equally weighted objects is perceived as heavier (Saccone & Chouinard, 2019).
Binet, A. (1895). La mesure des illusions visuelle chez les enfants. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger, 40, 11-25.
Brosvic, G. M., Dihoff, R. E., & Fama, J. (2002). Age-related susceptibility to the Muller-Lyer and the horizontal-vertical illusions. Percept Mot Skills, 94(1), 229-234, https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2002.94.1.229.
Chouinard, P. A., Matheson, K. G., Royals, K. A., Landry, O., Buckingham, G., Saccone, E. J., et al. (2019). The development of the size-weight illusion in children coincides with the development of nonverbal cognition rather than motor skills. J Exp Child Psychol, 184, 48-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.03.006.
Chouinard, P. A., Noulty, W. A., Sperandio, I., & Landry, O. (2013). Global processing during the Muller-Lyer illusion is distinctively affected by the degree of autistic traits in the typical population. Exp Brain Res, 230(2), 219-231, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3646-6.
Chouinard, P. A., Peel, H. J., & Landry, O. (2017). Eye-tracking reveals that the strength of the vertical-horizontal illusion increases as the retinal image becomes more stable with fixation. Front Hum Neurosci, 11, 143, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00143.
Chouinard, P. A., Royals, K. A., Landry, O., & Sperandio, I. (2018). The shepard illusion is reduced in children with an autism spectrum disorder because of perceptual rather than attentional mechanisms. Front Psychol, 9, 2452, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02452.
Chouinard, P. A., Unwin, K. L., Landry, O., & Sperandio, I. (2016). Susceptibility to optical illusions varies as a function of the autism-spectrum quotient but not in ways predicted by local-global biases. J Autism Dev Disord, 46(6), 2224-2239, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2753-1.
Dresslar, F. B. (1894). Studies in the psychology of touch. American Journal of Psychology, 6, 313-368.
Duffy, S., Huttenlocher, J., & Crawford, L. E. (2006). Children use categories to maximize accuracy in estimation. Dev Sci, 9(6), 597-603, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00538.x.
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (PPVT™-4). Pearson Education.
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Finlayson, N. J., Manser-Smith, K., Balraj, A., de Haas, B., & Schwarzkopf, D. S. (2018). The optimal experimental design for multiple alternatives perceptual search. Atten Percept Psychophys, 80(8), 1962-1973, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1568-x.
Finlayson, N. J., Papageorgiou, A., & Schwarzkopf, D. S. (2017). A new method for mapping perceptual biases across visual space. J Vis, 17(9), 5, https://doi.org/10.1167/17.9.5.
Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects. Behavioral Brain Science, 39, e229, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15000965.
Flournoy, T. (1894). De l'influence de la perception visuelle des corps sur leur poids objects. L'année psychologique, 1, 198-208.
Frederickson, W. A., & Geurin, J. (1973). Age difference in perceptual judgment on the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Percept Mot Skills, 36(1), 131-135, https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.19220.127.116.11.
Geisler, W. S., & Kersten, D. (2002). Illusions, perception and Bayes. Nat Neurosci, 5(6), 508-510, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn0602-508.
Gilbert, J. A. (1894). Researches on the mental and physical development of school-children. Studies from the Yale Psychological Laboratory, 2, 40-100.
Girgus, J. S., & Coren, S. (1987). The interaction between stimulus variations and age trends in the Poggendorff illusion. Percept Psychophys, 41(1), 60-66.
Gregory, R. L. (1980). Perceptions as hypotheses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 290(1038), 181-197.
Gregory, R. L. (2015). Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing (5th Edition ed.): Princeton University Press.
Hanley, C., & Zerbolio, D. J. (1965). Developmental Changes in Five Illusions Measured by the up-and-down Method. Child Dev, 36, 437-452.
Helmholtz, H. v. (1867). (Handbuch der physiologischen Optik). Leipzig, Germany: Voss.
Jogan, M., & Stocker, A. A. (2014). A new two-alternative forced choice method for the unbiased characterization of perceptual bias and discriminability. J Vis, 14(3), 20, https://doi.org/10.1167/14.3.20.
Kail, R., Pellegrino, J., & Carter, P. (1980). Developmental changes in mental rotation. J Exp Child Psychol, 29(1), 102-116.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1996). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, M.A.: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Margolis, J. A., Barrett, A. M., Goldknopf, E. J., & Daly, P. F. (1990). Age differences in imagery abilities. Child Dev, 61(4), 995-1010.
Landry, O., Johnson, K. A., Fleming, S. J., Crewther, S. G., & Chouinard, P. A. (2019). A new look at the developmental profile of visual endogenous orienting. J Exp Child Psychol, 183, 158-171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.022.
Leibowitz, H. W., & Gwozdecki, J. (1967). The magnitude of the Poggendorff illusion as a function of age. Child Dev, 38(2), 573-580.
Lutke, N., & Lange-Kuttner, C. (2015). Keeping It in Three Dimensions: Measuring the Development of Mental Rotation in Children with the Rotated Colour Cube Test (RCCT). Int J Dev Sci, 9(2), 95-114, https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-14154.
Mallenby, T. W. (1974). Effect of discussion on reduction of magnitude of Poggendorff illusion. Percept Mot Skills, 39(2), 787-791, https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1918.104.22.1687.
Mitchell, P., Mottron, L., Soulieres, I., & Ropar, D. (2010). Susceptibility to the Shepard illusion in participants with autism: reduced top-down influences within perception? Autism Res, 3(3), 113-119, https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.130.
Morgan, M. J., Melmoth, D., & Solomon, J. A. (2013). Linking hypotheses underlying Class A and Class B methods. Vis Neurosci, 30(5-6), 197-206, https://doi.org/10.1017/S095252381300045X.
O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Qual Quant, 41(5), 673-690, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6.
Patten, M. L., & Clifford, C. W. (2015). A bias-free measure of the tilt illusion. J Vis, 15(15), 8, https://doi.org/10.1167/15.15.8.
Philippe, J., & Clavière, J. (1895). Sur une illusion musculaire. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l'Étranger, 40, 672-682.
Piaget, J. (1969). The mechanisms of perception (G. N. Seagrim, Trans.). London: Routledge & K. Paul.
Piaget, J. (1999). The Psychology Of Intelligence: Taylor & Francis.
Pollack, R. H. (1970). Mueller-Lyer illusion: effect of age, lightness contrast, and hue. Science, 170(3953), 93-95.
Porac, C., & Coren, S. (1981). Life-span age trends in the perception of the Mueller-Lyer: additional evidence for the existence of two illusions. Can J Psychol, 35(1), 58-62.
Pressey, A. W., & Sweeney, O. (1970). Age changes in the Poggendorff illusion as measured by a method of production. Psychon Sci, 19, 99-100.
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2003). Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. San Antonio, YX: Harcourt Assessmen.
Rey, A. (1930). Contribution à l'étude de poids chez les anormaux. Archives de psychologie, 22, 285-287.
Saccone, E. J., & Chouinard, P. A. (2019). The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features. Psychon Bull Rev, 26(1), 77-89, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1519-5.
Schwarzkopf, D. S., Song, C., & Rees, G. (2011). The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size. Nat Neurosci, 14(1), 28-30, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2706.
Shepard, R. N. (1990). Mind sights: Original visual illusions, ambiguities, and other anomalies, with a commentary on the play of mind in perception and art. New York, NY: W.H.Freeman & Co Ltd.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701-703.
Sherman, J. A., & Chouinard, P. A. (2016). Attractive Contours of the Ebbinghaus Illusion. Percept Mot Skills, 122(1), 88-95, https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512515626632.
Sperandio, I., & Chouinard, P. A. (2015). The mechanisms of size constancy. Multisens Res, 28(3-4), 253-283, https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002483.
Tukey, J. W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 99-114.
Tyler, C. W. (2011). Paradoxical perception of surfaces in the Shepard tabletop illusion. Iperception, 2(2), 137-141, https://doi.org/10.1068/i0422.
Van der Hallen, R., Evers, K., Brewaeys, K., Van den Noortgate, W., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Global processing takes time: A meta-analysis on local-global visual processing in ASD. Psychol Bull, 141(3), 549-573, https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000004.
Vurpillot, E. (1957). L'influence de la signification du matériel sur l'illusion de Poggendorff. Année psychologique., 57(2), 338-357, https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1957.26611.
We thank the State of Victoria’s Department of Education and Training, and the primary and secondary schools in Bendigo for allowing us to recruit and test their students. This work was supported by grants from the La Trobe University’s Understanding Disease and Building Healthy Communities Research Focus Areas, and Social Research Assistance Platform.
Open practices statement
The data reported in this paper are available upon request. None of the experiments were preregistered.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Chouinard, P.A., Royals, K.A. & Landry, O. The strength of the Shepard illusion in children coincides with age and cognitive skills but not perceptual abilities. Atten Percept Psychophys 82, 1378–1390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01904-3
- Shepard illusion
- Developmental profile
- Typically developing children
- Size perception
- Shape perception