In this 3-experiment study, the Weber fractions in the 300-ms and 900-ms duration ranges are obtained with 9 types of empty intervals resulting from the combinations of three types of signals for marking the beginning and end of the signals: auditory (A), visual (V), or tactile (T). There were three types of intramodal intervals (AA, TT, and VV) and 6 types of intermodal intervals (AT, AV, VA, VT, TA, and TV). The second marker is always the same during Experiments 1 (A), 2 (V), and 3 (T). With an uncertainty strategy where the first marker is 1 of 2 sensory signals being presented randomly from trial to trial, the study provides direct comparisons of the perceived length of the different marker-type intervals. The results reveal that the Weber fraction is nearly constant in the three types of intramodal intervals, but is clearly lower at 900 ms than at 300 ms in intermodal conditions. In several cases, the intramodal intervals are perceived as shorter than intermodal intervals, which is interpreted as an effect of the efficiency in detecting the second marker of an intramodal interval. There were no significant differences between the TA and VA intervals (Experiment 1) and between the AV and TV intervals (Experiment 2), but in Experiment 3, the AT intervals were perceived as longer than the VT intervals. The results are interpreted in terms of the generalized form of Weber’s law, using the properties of the signals for explaining the additional nontemporal noise observed in the intermodal conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Behar, I., & Bevan, W. (1961). The perceived duration of auditory and visual intervals: Cross-modal comparison and interaction. The American Journal of Psychology, 74, 17–26.
Bueti, D. (2011). The sensory representation of time. Frontiers of Integrative Neuroscience, 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2011.00034
Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (2008). Timing and remembering the past, the present, and the future. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 367–394). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
Fraisse, P. (1952). La perception de la durée comme organisation du successif. Mise en évidence expérimentale. L'Année Psychologique, 52, 39–46.
Gamache, P.-L., & Grondin, S. (2010). The life span of time intervals in reference memory. Perception, 39, 1431–1451.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279–325.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. Allan (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Vol. 423. Timing and time perception (pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb23417.x
Giray, M., & Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 1278–1291.
Goldstone, S., & Goldfarb, J. L. (1964). Direct comparisons of auditory and visual durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(5), 483–485.
Goldstone, S., & Lhamon, W. T. (1972). Auditory-visual differences in human temporal judgment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 34(2), 623–633.
Goldstone, S., & Lhamon, W. T. (1974). Studies of auditory–visual differences in human time judgment: I. Sounds are judged longer than lights. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 39, 63–82.
Gontier, E., Hasuo, E., Mitsudo, T., & Grondin, S. (2013). EEG investigations of duration discrimination: The intermodal effect is induced by an attentional bias. PLOS ONE, 8(8): e74073. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074073.
Grondin, S. (1993). Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 383–394.
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 22–44.
Grondin, S. (2003). Sensory modalities and temporal processing. In H. Helfrich (Ed.), Time and Mind II: Information processing perspectives (pp. 75–92). Ashland, OH: Hogrefe & Huber.
Grondin, S. (2005). Overloading temporal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 869–879.
Grondin, S. (2008). Methods for studying psychological time. In S. Grondin (Ed.), Psychology of time (pp. 51–74). Bingley, England: Emerald Group.
Grondin S. (2010). Unequal Weber fraction for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1422–1430.
Grondin, S. (2014a). About the (non)scalar property for time perception. In H. Merchant & V. de Lafuente (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology: Vol. 829. Neurobiology of interval timing (pp. 17–32) New York: NY: Springer.
Grondin, S. (2014b). Why studying intermodal duration discrimination matters. Frontiers in Psychology: Perception Science, 5, 628. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00628
Grondin, S., Gamache, P.-L., Tobin, S., Bisson, N., & Hawke, L. (2008). Categorization of brief temporal intervals: An auditory processing context may impair visual performances. Acoustical Science & Technology, 29, 338–340.
Grondin, S., Ivry, R., Franz, E., Perreault, L., & Metthé, L. (1996). Markers’ influence on the duration discrimination of intermodal intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 424–433.
Grondin, S., Ouellet, B., & Roussel, M.-E. (2001). About optimal timing and stability of Weber fraction for duration discrimination. Acoustical Science & Technology, 22, 370–372.
Grondin, S., Ouellet, B., & Roussel, M.-E. (2004). Benefits and limits of explicit counting for discriminating temporal intervals. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 1–12.
Grondin, S., & Rousseau, R. (1991). Judging the relative duration of multimodal short empty time intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 245–256.
Grondin, S., Roussel, M.-E., Gamache, P.-L., Roy, M., & Ouellet, B. (2005). The structure of sensory events and the accuracy of judgments about time. Perception, 34, 45–58.
Hartcher-O’Brien, J., Di Luca, M., & Ernst, M. O. (2014). The duration of uncertain times: Audiovisual information about intervals is integrated in a statistically optimal fashion. PLOS ONE 9(3), e89339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089339
Hocherman, S., & Ben-Dov, G. (1979). Modality-specific effects on discrimination of short empty time intervals. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 48, 807–814.
Kanai, R., Lloyd, H., Bueti, D., & Walsh, V. (2011). Modality-independent role of the primary auditory cortex in time estimation. Experimental Brain Research, 209, 465–471.
Keele, S. W. (1986). Motor control. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 30-1–30-60). Toronto, Canada: Wiley.
Kuroda, T., Hasuo, E., Labonté, K., Laflamme, V., & Grondin, S. (2014). Discrimination of two neighboring intramodal and intermodal empty time intervals marked by three successive stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 9, 134–141.
Mayer, K. M., Di Luca, M.. & Ernst, M. O. (2014). Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals. Acta Psychologica, 147, 2–9.
Mioni, G., Grassi, M., Tarantino, V., Stablum, F., Grondin, S., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2016a). The impact of a concurrent motor task on auditory and visual temporal discrimination tasks. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 742–748.
Mioni, G., Grondin, S., Forgione, M., Fracasso, V., Mapelli, D. & Stablum, F. (2016b). The role of primary auditory and visual cortices in temporal processing: A tDCS approach. Behavioural Brain Research, 313, 151–157.
Mioni, G., Grondin, S., Mapelli, D., & Stablum, F. (2018). A tRNS investigation of the sensory representation of time. Scientific Reports, 8, 10364, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28673-7
Penney, T. B., Gibbon, J., & Meck, W. H. (2000). Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1770–1787.
Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rammsayer, T., & Ulrich, R. (2001). Counting models of temporal discrimination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 270–277.
Rousseau, L., & Rousseau, R. (1996) Stop-reaction time and the internal clock. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 434–448.
Rousseau, R., & Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). The discrimination of bimodal temporal gaps. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1, 115–116.
Rousseau, R., Poirier, J., & Lemyre, L. (1983). Duration discrimination of empty time intervals marked by intermodal pulses. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 541–548.
Stauffer, C. C., Haldemann, J., Troche, S. J., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2012). Auditory and visual temporal sensitivity: Evidence for a hierarchical structure of modality-specific and modality-independent levels of temporal information processing. Psychological Research, 76, 20–31.
Ulrich, R., Nitschke, J., & Rammsayer, T. (2006). Crossmodal temporal discrimination: Assessing the predictions of a general pacemaker-counter model. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 1140–1152.
van Noorden, L. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands. doi:https://doi.org/10.6100/IR152538
Walker, J. T., & Scott, K. J. (1981). Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1327–1339.
Wearden, J. H., Edwards, H., Fakhri, M., & Percival, A. (1998). Why “sounds are judged longer than lights”: Application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51B, 97–120.
This study is part of the Doctoral thesis of L.A. This study was supported by a research grant (Grant No. RGPIN-2016-05028) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to S.G. We would like to thank Célyne Bastien for her comments on this project and one anonymous reviewer for the comments on a previous version of this article. Correspondence should be addressed to Simon Grondin, École de psychologie, 2325 rue des Bibliothèques, Université Laval, Québec, Qc, Canada, G1V 0A6 (E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Azari, L., Mioni, G., Rousseau, R. et al. An analysis of the processing of intramodal and intermodal time intervals. Atten Percept Psychophys 82, 1473–1487 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01900-7
- Temporal Processing
- Time perception
- Sensory modalities