Executive function, or cognitive control, describes the ability to guide information processing in line with internal goals, but the nature of—and relationship between—the component processes supporting this ability remains poorly understood. Two key components of cognitive control are thought to be the regulation of the declarative contents of working memory (WM) and the selection of task sets, or procedural rules that determine how declarative items are employed. Factor-analytic studies have suggested that updating the items held in WM and updating task sets are cognitively distinct, but interrelated, core domains of executive function. However, the precise relationship between these processes remains unknown, since they have rarely been tested simultaneously in a single task. In the present study, we devised a novel method of independently manipulating declarative item-updating and procedural task-updating processes in WM. Across two experiments, we found that the updating of declarative and procedural WM representations interacted subadditively, suggesting they are not constrained by a common processing bottleneck. Moreover, in a third experiment, we found that updating two declarative items in WM simultaneously did not incur a behavioral cost in response time above and beyond the cost of one item alone. Taken together, our results provide new evidence that the updating of information in declarative and procedural WM is mutually facilitative, such that opening the gate for updating declarative content reduces the time needed to update procedural content, and vice versa.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bainbridge, W. A., Isola, P., & Oliva, A. (2013). The intrinsic memorability of face photographs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1323–1334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033872
Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.65
Bertolino, A., Blasi, G., Latorre, V., Rubino, V., Rampino, A., Sinibaldi, L., … Dallapiccola, B. (2006). Additive effects of genetic variation in dopamine regulating genes on working memory cortical activity in human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 3918–3922. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4975-05.2006
Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 713–737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chiu, Y.-C., & Egner, T. (2017). Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1950–1960. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000420
Cole, M. W., Bagic, A., Kass, R., & Schneider, W. (2010). Prefrontal dynamics underlying rapid instructed task learning reverse with practice. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 14245–14254. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1662-10.2010
Cole, M. W., Ito, T., & Braver, T. S. (2015). The behavioral relevance of task information in human prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 2497–2505. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv072
Cole, M. W., Laurent, P., & Stocco, A. (2013). Rapid instructed task learning: A new window into the human brain’s unique capacity for flexible cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0125-7
Cools, R. (2008). Role of dopamine in the motivational and cognitive control of behavior. Neuroscientist, 14, 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858408317009
Cools, R., & D’Esposito, M. (2011). Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biological Psychiatry, 69, e113–e125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
Crump, M. J. C., & Logan, G. D. (2010). Contextual control over task-set retrieval. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2047–2053. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196681
D’Ardenne, K., Eshel, N., Luka, J., Lenartowicz, A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2012). Role of prefrontal cortex and the midbrain dopamine system in working memory updating. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 1900–1909.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
Dreisbach, G. (2012). Mechanisms of cognition control: The functional role of task rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412449830
Dreisbach G., & Haider, H. (2006). Preparatory adjustment of cognitive control in the task switching paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 334-338
Dreisbach, G., & Haider, H. (2008). That’s what task sets are for: Shielding against irrelevant information. Psychological Research, 72, 355–361.
Dreisbach, G., & Wenke, D. (2011). The shielding function of task sets and its relaxation during task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1540–1546.
Frank, M. J., Loughry, B., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2001). Interactions between frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 137–160. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.1.2.137
Friedman, N. P., Haberstick, B. C., Willcutt, E. G., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2007). Greater attention problems during childhood predict poorer executive functioning in late adolescence. Psychological Science, 18, 893–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01997.x
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Defries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Robinson, J. L., & Hewitt, J. K. (2011). Developmental trajectories in toddlers’ self-restraint predict individual differences in executive functions 14 years later: A behavioral genetic analysis. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1410–1430. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023750
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3422.214.171.124
Gade, M., Souza, A. S., Druey, M. D., & Oberauer, K. (2017). Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N–2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs. Memory & Cognition, 45, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0645-4
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263–276. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201138
Hazy, T. E., Frank, M. J., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2006). Banishing the homunculus: Making working memory work. Neuroscience, 139, 105–118.
Heatherton, T. F., & Wagner, D. D. (2011). Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.005.
Kessler, Y. (2017). The role of working memory gating in task switching: A procedural version of the reference-back paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2260. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02260
Kessler, Y., Baruchin, L. J., & Bouhsira-Sabag, A. (2017). Working memory updating occurs independently of the need to maintain task-context: Accounting for triggering updating in the AX-CPT paradigm. Psychological Research, 81, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0717-2
Kessler, Y., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Working memory updating latency reflects the cost of switching between maintenance and updating modes of operation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035545
Kessler, Y., & Oberauer, K. (2015). Forward scanning in verbal working memory updating. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1770–1776. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0853-0
Kleinsorge, T., & Heuer, H. (1999). Hierarchical switching in a multi-dimensional task space. Psychological Research, 62, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260050060
Korb, F. M., Jiang, J., King, J. A., & Egner, T. (2017). Hierarchically organized medial frontal cortex-basal ganglia loops selectively control task-and response-selection. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 7893–7905.
Leber, A. B., Turk-Browne, N. B., & Chun, M. M. (2008). Neural predictors of moment-to-moment fluctuations in cognitive flexibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 13592–13597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805423105
Leboe, J. P., Wong, J., Crump, M., & Stobbe, K. (2008). Probe-specific proportion task repetition effects on switching costs. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 935–945. https://doi.org/10.3758/pp.70.6.935
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/36846
Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34126.96.36.199
Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., … Shoda, Y. (2011). “Willpower” over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq081
Miyake, A., & Friedman, N. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
Moffitt, T. E., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., . . . Caspi, A. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1010076108
Monsell, S., & Mizon, G. A. (2006). Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-15188.8.131.523
Montojo, C. A., & Courtney, S. M. (2008). Differential neural activation for updating rule versus stimulus information in working memory. Neuron, 59, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.05.012
Muhle-Karbe, P. S., Andres, M., & Brass, M. (2014). Transcranial magnetic stimulation dissociates prefrontal and parietal contributions to task preparation. Journal of Neuroscience, 34, 12481–12489. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4931-13.2014
Nolan, K. A., Bilder, R. M., Lachman, H. M., & Volavka, J. (2004). Catechol O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism in schizophrenia: Differential effects of Val and Met alleles on cognitive stability and flexibility. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 359–361. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.161.2.359
O’Reilly, R. C. (2006). Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science, 314, 91–94.
O’Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (2006). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation, 18, 283–328. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976606775093909
Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 50, 257–269. https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3184.108.40.2067
Oberauer, K. (2009). Design for a working memory. In B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 51, pp. 45–100). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.
Rac-Lubashevsky, R., & Kessler, Y. (2016). Dissociating working memory updating and automatic updating: The reference-back paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 951–969.
Risse, S., & Oberauer, K. (2010). Selection of objects and tasks in working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 784–804. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903147486
Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-34220.127.116.11
Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2015). Learned states of preparatory attentional control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1790–1805. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000146
Sali, A. W., Courtney, S. M., & Yantis, S. (2016). Spontaneous fluctuations in the flexible control of covert attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 36, 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2323-15.2016
Souza, A. S., Oberauer, K., Gade, M., & Druey, M. D. (2012). Processing of representations in declarative and procedural working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1006–1033. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.640403
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In N. J. Castellan Jr. & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 3, pp. 200–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Townsend J. T., & Ashby F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Waszak, F., Hommel, B., & Allport, A. (2003). Task-switching and long-term priming: Role of episodic stimulus-task bindings in task-shift costs. Cognitive Psychology, 46, 361–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00520-0
This research was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant R01-MH087610 to T.E and in part by US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (BSF) grant 2016234 to TE. We thank Yoav Kessler for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sali, A.W., Egner, T. Declarative and procedural working memory updating processes are mutually facilitative. Atten Percept Psychophys 82, 1858–1871 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01887-1
- Working memory
- Task switching
- Executive control
- Cognitive and attentional control