Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 80, Issue 4, pp 829–843 | Cite as

Visual search for changes in scenes creates long-term, incidental memory traces



Humans are very good at remembering large numbers of scenes over substantial periods of time. But how good are they at remembering changes to scenes? In this study, we tested scene memory and change detection two weeks after initial scene learning. In Experiments 13, scenes were learned incidentally during visual search for change. In Experiment 4, observers explicitly memorized scenes. At test, after two weeks observers were asked to discriminate old from new scenes, to recall a change that they had detected in the study phase, or to detect a newly introduced change in the memorization experiment. Next, they performed a change detection task, usually looking for the same change as in the study period. Scene recognition memory was found to be similar in all experiments, regardless of the study task. In Experiment 1, more difficult change detection produced better scene memory. Experiments 2 and 3 supported a “depth-of-processing” account for the effects of initial search and change detection on incidental memory for scenes. Of most interest, change detection was faster during the test phase than during the study phase, even when the observer had no explicit memory of having found that change previously. This result was replicated in two of our three change detection experiments. We conclude that scenes can be encoded incidentally as well as explicitly and that changes in those scenes can leave measurable traces even if they are not explicitly recalled.


Visual search Long-term memory Change blindness Incidental learning 

Supplementary material

13414_2018_1486_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (120 kb)
ESM 1 (JPEG 119 kb)
13414_2018_1486_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (120 kb)
ESM 2 (JPEG 119 kb)


  1. Adamo, S. H., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Self-induced attentional blink: A cause of errors in multipletarget search. Psychological Science, 24(12), 2569–2574.Google Scholar
  2. Andermane, N., & Bowers, J. S. (2015). Detailed and gist-like visual memories are forgotten at similar rates over the course of a week. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1358–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14325–14329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Oliva, A., & Alvarez, G. A. (2009). Detecting changes in real-world objects: The relationship between visual long-term memory and change blindness. Communicative and Integrative Biology, 2, 1:1–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Memory for found targets interferes with subsequent performance in multiple-target visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1398–1408. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cain, M. S., Adamo, S. H., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). A taxonomy of multiple-target search errors. Visual Cognition, 21(7), 899–921.Google Scholar
  8. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Incidental visual memory for objects in scenes. Visual Cognition, 12, 1017–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 224–234. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Draschkow, D., Wolfe, J. M., & Võ, M. L.-H. (2014). Seek and you shall remember: Scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories. Journal of Vision, 14(8), 10. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Fleck, M. S., Samei, E., & Mitroff, S. R. (2010). Generalized ‘satisfaction of search’: Adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 60–71.Google Scholar
  15. Gehring, R. E., Toglia, P. M., & Kimble, G. A. (1976). Recognition memory for words and pictures at short and long retention intervals. Memory & Cognition, 4, 256–260. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollingworth, A. (2004). Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: The roles of short- and long-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 519–537. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollingworth, A. (2005). The relationship between online visual representation of a scene and long-term scene memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 396–411. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hollingworth, A. (2006a). Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 58–69. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hollingworth, A. (2006b). Visual memory for natural scenes: Evidence from change detection and visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 781–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113–136. Google Scholar
  21. Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2001). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 761–768Google Scholar
  22. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Learning in repeated visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1267–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 90–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Howard, C. J., Pharaon, R. G., Körner, C., Smith, A. D., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2011). Visual search in the real world: Evidence for the formation of distractor representations. Perception, 40, 1143–1153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Isola, P., Xiao, J., Parikh, D, Torralba, A., & Oliva, A. (2014). What makes a photograph memorable? IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 36, 1469–1482.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Janzen, G., & van Turennout, M. (2004). Selective neural representation of objects relevant for navigation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 673–677.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiang, Y., Song, J.-H., & Rigas, A. (2005). High-capacity spatial contextual memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 524–529. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Konkle, T., Brady, T. F., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2010). Scene memory is more detailed than you think: The role of categories in visual long-term memory. Psychological Science, 21, 1551–1556. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Körner, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Finding a new target in an old display: Evidence for a memory recency effect in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 846–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Körner, C., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2008). Memory processes in multiple-target visual search. Psychological Research, 72, 99–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kristjánsson, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328–332.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 314–328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657–672. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Milliken, B., & Jolicœur, P. (1992). Size effects in visual recognition memory are determined by perceived size. Memory & Cognition, 20, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nickerson, R. S. (1968). A note on long-term recognition memory for pictorial material. Psychonomic Science, 11, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliva, A., Wolfe, J. M., & Arsenio, H. C. (2004). Panoramic search: The interaction of memory and vision in search through a familiar scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1132–1146. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162, 8–13. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Peterson, M. S., Beck, M. R., & Vomela, M. (2007). Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 123–135. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peterson, M. S., Kramer, A. F., Wang, R. F., Irwin, D. E., & McCarley, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287–292. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rensink, R. A., O’Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosen, M. L., Stern, C. E., & Somers, D. C. (2014). Long-term memory guidance of visuospatial attention in a change-detection paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 266. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Saltzman, I. J., & Atkinson, R. L. (1954). Comparisons of incidental and intentional learning after different numbers of stimulus presentations. American Journal of Psychology, 67, 521–524.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Sareen, P., Ehinger, K. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2016). CB Database: A change blindness database for objects in natural indoor scenes. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1343–1348. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simons, D. J., Chabris, C. F., Schnur, T. T., & Levin, D. T. (2002). Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 11, 78–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207–222. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tatler, B. W. & Tatler, S. L. (2013). The influence of instructions on object memory in a real world setting. Journal of Vision, 13(2):5, 1–13.Google Scholar
  50. Teghtsoonian, M. (1965). The judgment of size. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 392–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomas, M. D., & Williams, C. C. (2014). The target effect: Visual memory for unnamed search targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2090–2104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Utochkin, I. S. (2011a). Hide-and-seek around the centre of interest: The dead zone of attention revealed by change blindness. Visual Cognition, 19, 1063–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Utochkin, I. S. (2011b). Strategies of visual search for changes in complex scenes. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 49, 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vickery, T. J., King, L.-W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1), :81–92. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Võ, M. H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2013). The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes. Cognition, 126, 198–212. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Võ, M. L.-H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2012). When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 23–41. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Williams, C. C. (2010). Incidental and intentional visual memory: What memories are and are not affected by encoding task? Visual Cognition, 18, 1348–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams, C. C., Henderson, J. M., & Zacks, R. T. (2005). Incidental visual memory for targets and distractors in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 816–827. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolfe, J. M., Alvarez, G. A., Rosenholtz, R., Kuzmova, Y. I., & Sherman, A. M. (2011). Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1650–1671. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N., & Dahlen, K. (2000). Post-attentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 693–716. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Zeigarnik, B. (1938). On finished and unfinished tasks. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 300–314). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Visual Attention LaboratoryBrigham & Women’s HospitalCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Radiology and OphthalmologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations