Abstract
People prefer to order spatial information in a hierarchy of decreasing size of spatial unit when giving directions for finding objects and in a hierarchy of increasing size of spatial unit when providingescriptions of object locations (Plumert, Carswell, DeVet, & Ihrig, 1995). In five experiments, we examined whther people have a preference for ascending or descending organization when the task does not involve conveying spatial information to others. In Experiments 1-3, people learned the locations of objects in a model house and then verified statements describing those locations. People verified statements faster when spatial units were organized in an ascending (i.e., small to large) than in a descending (i.e., large to small) or random order. In Experiment 4, people first performed a sentence verification task and afterward wrote down directions for finding the objects. People again exhibited a preference for ascending organization in the verification task but exhibited a preference for descending organization when giving directions for finding the same objects. Experiment 5 demonstrated that the ascending advantage was not due to the link between the object and small landmark. Discussion focuses on the role of pragmatics and memory retrieval in preferences for ascending versus descending hierarchical organization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bower, G. H., Clark, M. C., Lesgold, A. M., &Winzenz, D. (1969). Hierarchical retrieval schemes in recall of categorical word lists.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 323–343.
Clark, H. H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 179–231). New York: Harper & Row.
Collins, A. M., &Quillian, M. R. (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 240–247.
Hirtle, S. C., &Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps.Memory & Cognition,13, 208–217.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In S. Peters & E. Saarinen (Eds.),Processes, beliefs, and questions: Essays on formal semantics of natural language and natural language processing (pp. 199–220). Boston: D. Reidel.
Linde, C., &Labov, W. (1975). Spatial networks as a site for the study of language and thought.Language,51, 924–939.
McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology,18, 87–121.
McNamara, T. P., &Diwadkar, V. A. (1997). Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory.Cognitive Psychology,34, 160–190.
Newcombe, N., Huttenlocher, J., Sandberg, E., Lie, E., &Johnson, S. (1999). What do misestimations and asymmetries in spatial judgment indicate about spatial representation?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 986–996.
Plumert, J. M., Carswell, C., DeVet, K., &Ihrig, D. (1995). The content and organization of communication about object locations.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 477–498.
Plumert, J. M., Pick, H. L., Jr.,Marks, R. A., Kintsch, A. S., &Wegesin, D. (1994). Locating objects and communicating about locations: Organizational differences in children's searching and directiongiving.Developmental Psychology,30, 443–453.
Sadalla, E. K., Burroughs, W. J., &Staplin, L. J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 516–528.
Schober, M. F. (1993). Spatial perspective-taking in conversation.Cognition,47, 1–24.
Shanon, B. (1984). Room descriptions. Discourse Processes, 7, 225–255.
Stevens, A., &Coupe, P. (1978). Distortions in judged spatial relations.Cognitive Psychology,10, 422–437.
Taylor, H. A., &Tversky, B. (1992). Descriptions and depictions of environments.Memory & Cognition,20, 483–496.
Ullmer-Ehrich, V. (1982). The structure of living space descriptions. In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.),Speech, place, and action: Studies of deixis and gesture (pp. 219–249). Chichester, U.K.: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plumert, J.M., Spalding, T.L. & Nichols-Whitehead, P. Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication. Memory & Cognition 29, 274–284 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194921
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194921