Advertisement

Relevance-based processing: Little role for task-relevant expectations

  • Adam Tapal
  • Yaffa Yeshurun
  • Baruch EitamEmail author
Brief Report
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

This study examined the role of advance expectations in generating relevance-based selection, using a version of cognitive “blindness” that is driven solely by task relevance. With this irrelevance-induced blindness, participants often fail to report a feature of an irrelevant stimulus, even though the levels of perceptual and cognitive load are minimal (i.e., capacity limitations are not met). Hence, with this phenomenon, selection is based solely on task relevance. In two experiments, we examined such relevance-based selection with a new paradigm in which the participants had to report the location of an object appearing on one of two rings. Critically, while in Experiment 1 the participants could form advance expectations regarding the (ir) relevant stimuli, because the location of the relevant ring and the shape and color of the relevant object were known in advance, in Experiment 2 no concrete advance expectations could be formed. This was established by varying randomly, from trial to trial, the shape, color, and location of relevant and irrelevant stimuli. We found strong irrelevance-induced blindness in both experiments, regardless of whether or not advance expectations were formed. These findings suggest that advance expectations, at least with regard to the task-relevant stimulus’ location shape or color, are not necessary for irrelevance-induced blindness to occur; more generally, this implies that such expectations do not play a critical role in selection processes that are based solely on task relevance. We further discuss these findings in the context of Garnerian and Posnerian selection, and their relationship to visual awareness.

Keywords

Selective attention Visual awareness Consciousness Relevance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by The Israel Science Foundation (ISF) grant number 339/16 and The Binational Science Foundation (BSF) grant number 2016299 to B.E.

Supplementary material

13423_2019_1600_MOESM1_ESM.docx (744 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 744 kb)

References

  1. Bashinski, H. S., & Bacharach, V. R. (1980). Enhancement of perceptual sensitivity as the result of selectively attending to spatial locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 28, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cepeda, N. J., Cave, K. R., Bichot, N. P., & Kim, M. S. (1998). Spatial selection via feature-driven inhibition of distractor locations. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 60(5), 727–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheal, M., & Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(1), 51–71.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, H., & Wyble, B. (2015). Amnesia for object attributes: Failure to report attended information that had just reached conscious awareness. Psychological Science, 26(2), 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 951–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2016). From reaction (‘priming’) to motivated selection: Changing conceptualizations of accessibility. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eitam, B., Shoval, R., & Yeshurun, Y. (2015). Seeing without knowing: Task relevance dissociates between visual awareness and recognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339(1), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eitam, B., Yeshurun, Y., & Hassan, K. (2013). Blinded by irrelevance: Pure irrelevance induced “blindness”. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 39(3), 611–615.Google Scholar
  10. Garner, W. R. (1970). The stimulus in information processing. American Psychologist, 25, 350–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468.Google Scholar
  12. Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12(1), 9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Müller, M. M., & Hübner, R. (2002). Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials. Psychological Science, 13(2), 119–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rock, I., Linnett, C. G., Grant, P. P., & Mack, A.(1992). Perception without attention: Results of a new method. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 502–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saenz, M., Buracas, G. T., & Boynton, G. M (2003). Global feature-based attention for motion and color. Vision Research, 43, 629–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shalev, L., & Algom, D. (2000). Stroop and Garner effects in and out Posner’s beam: Reconciling two conceptions of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 997–1017.Google Scholar
  18. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Spruyt, A., De Houwer, J., Hermans, D., & Eelen, P. (2007). Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Usher, M., Bronfman, Z., Talmor, S., Jacobson, H., & Eitam, B. (2018). Consciousness without report: Insights from summary statistics and inattention “blindness.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  21. Wyble B., Hess M., O’Donnell K., Chen, H., & Eitam, B. (2018). Learning how to exploit sources of information. Memory & Cognition   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0881-x
  22. Yeshurun, Y., & Carrasco, M. (1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research, 39(2), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations