Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 360–366 | Cite as

Merely presenting one’s own name along with target items is insufficient to produce a memory advantage for the items: A critical role of relational processing

  • Kyungmi KimEmail author
  • Jenne D. Johnson
  • Danielle J. Rothschild
  • Marcia K. Johnson
Brief Report


Using the self as a reference point at encoding produces a memory advantage over other types of encoding activities. Even simply co-presenting a target item with self-relevant versus other-relevant information can produce an “incidental” self-memory advantage in the absence of any explicit task demand to evaluate the item’s self-relevancy. In the present study, we asked whether an incidental self-memory advantage results from (a) the mere co-presentation of a target item with self-relevant information at encoding or (b) relational processing between a target item and self-relevant information at encoding. During incidental encoding, words were presented in two different colors either above or below a name (the participant’s own or another person’s). Participants judged either the location of each word in relation to the name (“Is the word above or below the name?”) or the color of each word to which the name had no relevance (“Is the word in red or green?”). In a subsequent memory test, we found a self-memory advantage for both items and their associated source features in the location judgment task but not in the color judgment task. Our findings show that a memory advantage for a target item presented with self-relevant versus other-relevant information is more likely when a task agenda places, via relational processing demands, the self-relevant/other-relevant information in the focus of attention along with the target item. Potential processes that mediate this attention-dependent effect are discussed.


Self-reference effect Relational encoding Attention Self-related processing Self 


Author Note

This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health under Grant R37AG009253 and a Grant in Support of Scholarship (GISOS) from Wesleyan University.


  1. Alexopoulos, T., Muller, D., Ric, F., & Marendaz, C. (2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 770-779. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-9.
  3. Bundesen, C., Kyllingsbaek, S., Houmann, K. J., & Jensen, R. M. (1997). Is visual attention automatically attracted to one’s own name? Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 714-720. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castel, A. D., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology and Aging, 18, 873-885. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Memory: Enduring traces of perceptual and reflective attention. Neuron, 72, 520-535. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331-335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Conway, M. A., & Dewhurst, S. A. (1995). The self and recollective experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham, S. J., Brebner, J. L., Quinn, F., & Turk, D. J. (2014). The self-reference effect on memory in early childhood. Child Development, 85, 808-823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, S. J., & Turk, D. J. (2017). A review of self-processing biases in cognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 987-995. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, S. J., Turk, D. J., MacDonald, L. M., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Yours or mine? Ownership and memory. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 312-318. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devue, C., Van der Stigchel, S., Brédart, S., & Theeuwes, J. (2009). You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer. Cognition, 111, 114-112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Durbin, K. A., Mitchell, K. J., & Johnson, M. K. (2017). Source memory that encoding was self-referential: The influence of stimulus characteristics. Memory, 25, 1191-1200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gronau, N., Cohen, A., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2003). Dissociations of personally significant and task-relevant distractors inside and outside the focus of attention: A combined behavioral and psychophysiological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 512-529.
  14. Harris, C. R., Pashler, H. E., & Coburn, N. (2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1-31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 5-17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. JASP Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.8.6). [Computer software] Available from
  17. Jeffreys, J. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, M. K., & Hirst, W. (1993). MEM: Memory subsystems as processes. In A.F. Collins, S.E. Gathercole, M.A. Conway, & P.E. Morris (Eds.), Theories of memory (pp. 241-286). East Sussex, England: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes Factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawahara, J., & Yamada, Y. (2004). Does one’s name attract visual attention? Visual Cognition, 11, 997-1017. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuiper, N. A., & Rogers, T. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 499-514. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laarni, J., Koljonen, M., Kuistio, A. M., Kyröläinen, S., Lempiäinen, J., & Lepistö, T. (2000). Images of a familiar face do not capture attention under conditions of inattention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 1216-1218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lui, M., & Sui, J. (2016). The interaction between social saliency and perceptual saliency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2419–2430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maki, R. H., & McCaul, K. D. (1985). The effects of self-reference versus other reference on the recall of traits and nouns. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 169-172. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 55-60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677-688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rouder, J. N., Morey, R. D., Verhagen, J., Swagman, A. R., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2017). Bayesian analysis of factorial designs. Psychological Methods, 22, 304-321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 225-237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504-514. Google Scholar
  32. Shi, Y., Sedikides, C., Cai, H., Liu, Y., & Yang, Z. (2017). Dis-owning the self: The cultural value of modesty can attenuate self-positivity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1023-1032. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Troyer, A. K., Winocur, G., Craik, F. I. M., & Moscovitch, M. (1999). Source memory and divided attention: Reciprocal costs to primary and secondary tasks. Neuropsychology, 13, 467-474. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 1040-1045. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyungmi Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jenne D. Johnson
    • 1
  • Danielle J. Rothschild
    • 1
  • Marcia K. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWesleyan UniversityMiddletownUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations