Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 681–687 | Cite as

Does spatial information impact immediate verbatim recall of verbal navigation instructions?

  • Vivian I. Schneider
  • Alice F. Healy
  • James A. Kole
  • Immanuel Barshi
Brief Report

Abstract

The present study addresses the issue of whether spatial information impacts immediate verbatim recall of verbal navigation instructions. Subjects heard messages instructing them to move within a two-dimensional depiction of a three-dimensional space consisting of four stacked grids displayed on a computer screen. They repeated the instructions orally and then followed them manually by clicking with a mouse on the grids. Two groups with identical instructions were compared; they differed only in whether the starting position was indicated before or after the instructions were given and repeated, with no differences in the manual movements to be made. Accuracy on both the oral repetition and manual movement responses was significantly higher when the starting position was indicated before the instructions. The results are consistent with the proposal that there is only a single amodal mental representation, rather than distinct verbal and nonverbal representations, of navigation instructions. The advantage for the before condition was found even for the oral repetition responses, implying that the creation of the amodal representation occurred immediately, while the instructions were being held in working memory. In practical terms, the findings imply that being able to form a mental representation of the movement path while being given verbal navigation instructions should substantially facilitate memory for the instructions and execution of them.

Keywords

Navigation and spatial memory Human memory and learning Mental models Amodal mental representation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Grants NCC2-1310, NNA07CN59A, NNX10AC87A, and NNX14AB75A. The authors thank Antonia Hamilton and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions concerning an earlier version of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

13423_2017_1379_MOESM1_ESM.docx (48 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 48 kb)

References

  1. Barshi, I., & Healy, A. F. (2002). The effects of mental representation on performance in a navigation task. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1189-1203. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barshi, I., & Healy, A. F. (2011). The effects of spatial representation on memory for verbal navigation instructions. Memory & Cognition, 39, 47-62. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0024-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryant, D. J. (1997). Representing space in language and perception. Mind & Language, 12, 239-264. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.1997.tb00073.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeffery, K. J., Jovalekic, A., Verriotis, M., & Hayman, R. (2013). Navigating in a three-dimensional world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 523–543. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002476 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.163 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J. B., & Caterino, L. C. (1985). Conjoint retention of maps and related discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10, 28-37. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(85)90003-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Loomis, J. M., Klatzky, R. L., & Giudice, N. A. (2013). Representing 3D space in working memory: Spatial images from vision, hearing, touch, and language. In S. Lacey & R. Lawson (Eds.), Multisensory imagery (pp. 131-155). New York: Springer. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5879-1_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lyon, D. R., Gunzelmann, G., & Gluck, K. A. (2008). A computational model of spatial visualization capacity. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 122-152. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Morett, L. M., Clegg, B. A., Blalock, L. D., & Mong, H. M. (2009). Applying multimedia learning theory to map learning and driving navigation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12, 40-49. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2008.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  12. Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261-292. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90014-O CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vivian I. Schneider
    • 1
  • Alice F. Healy
    • 1
  • James A. Kole
    • 2
  • Immanuel Barshi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA
  2. 2.School of Psychological SciencesUniversity of Northern ColoradoGreeleyUSA
  3. 3.Human Systems Integration DivisionNASA, Ames Research CenterMoffett FieldUSA

Personalised recommendations