Advertisement

The tip-of-the-tongue state bias permeates unrelated concurrent decisions and behavior

  • Anne M. ClearyEmail author
  • Andrew M. Huebert
  • Katherine L. McNeely-White
Article

Abstract

The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) state—the feeling of being near accessing an as yet inaccessible word from memory—is associated with cognitive bias. For example, prior work has shown that TOTs are associated with a bias toward inferring positive qualities of the unretrieved information. People are biased during TOTs to indicate that the unretrieved target has a greater likelihood of being positively valenced and to have been associated with a higher value number earlier in the experiment. Additionally, when the TOT is for a pictured person’s name, that person is judged to be more likely to be ethical. The present study demonstrates that the TOT positivity bias extends to unrelated concurrent decisions and behavior. In Experiment 1, participants reported a greater inclination to take an unrelated gamble during TOTs than non-TOTs. Experiment 2 demonstrated the concurrent nature of this spillover effect. The TOT bias toward a greater inclination to gamble significantly diminished with a 10-second delay between the time of reporting the TOT state and the time to report the inclination. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that the increased inclination to want to take a gamble during TOTs translated to actual gambling behavior. Participants chose to gamble for points more often during TOTs than non-TOTs.

Keywords

Metamemory Judgment Heuristics Memory Tip of the tongue Risk-taking Gambling 

Notes

References

  1. Brown, A. S. (1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, A. S. (2012). The tip of the tongue state. Hove, England: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, R., & McNeill, D. (1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 5, 325–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 542–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleary, A. M. (2006). Relating familiarity-based recognition and the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Detecting a word’s recency in the absence of access to the word. Memory & Cognition, 34, 804–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleary, A. M. (2018). The biasing nature of the tip-of-the-tongue experience: When decisions bask in the glow of the tip-of-the-tongue state. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleary, A. M., & Claxton, A. B. (2015). The tip-of-the-tongue heuristic: How tip-of-the-tongue states confer perceptibility on inaccessible words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1533–1539. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleary, A. M., Konkel, K. E., Nomi, J. N., & McCabe, D. P. (2010). Odor recognition without identification. Memory & Cognition, 38, 452–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cleary, A. M., & Reyes, N. L. (2009). Scene recognition without identification. Acta Psychologica, 131, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cleary, A. M., & Specker, L. E. (2007). Recognition without face identification. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1610–1619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleary, A. M., Staley, S. R., & Klein, K. R. (2014). The effect of tip-of-the-tongue states on other cognitive judgments. In B. L. Schwartz & A. S. Brown (Eds.), Tip-of-the-tongue states and related phenomena (pp. 75-94). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, L. F., Nadorff, M. R., & Kelly, A. E. (2009). Winning and positive affect can lead to reckless gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behavior, 23, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Angelo, M. C., & Humphreys, K. R. (2012). Emotional cues do not increase the likelihood of tip-of-the-tongue states. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1331–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gollan, T. H., & Brown, A. S., (2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 462–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hertwig, R., Herzog, S. M., Schooler, L. J., & Reimer, T. (2008). Fluency heuristic: A model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1191–1206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Koriat, A., & Lieblich, I. (1974). What does a person in a “TOT” state know that a person in a “don’t know” state doesn’t know. Memory & Cognition, 2, 647–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ludvig, E. A., Madan, C. R., & Spetch, M. L. (2015). Priming memories of past wins induces risk seeking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 24–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Bloom, P. A. (2017). The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(31). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4
  19. Monin, B. (2003). The warm glow heuristic: When liking leads to familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1035–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010). Associative processes in intuitive judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 435–440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1980). Norms of 300 general-information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 338–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for the unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Payne, B. K., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Loersch, C. (2016). Replicable effects of primes on human behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 145(10), 1269–1279. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000201 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rastle, K. G., & Burke, D. M. (1996). Priming the tip of the tongue: Effects of prior processing on word retrieval in young and older adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 586–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ryals, A. J., Reynolds, B., Patton, C., & Cleary, A. M. (2018, November). Pupil dilation suggests a role of autonomic arousal in tip-of-the-tongue state phenomenology. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  26. Schwartz, B. L. (1999). Sparkling at the end of the tongue: The etiology of tip-of-the-tongue phenomenology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwartz, B. L. (2001). The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time. Memory & Cognition, 29, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz, B. L. (2008). Working memory load differentially affects tip-of-the-tongue states and feeling-of-knowing judgment. Memory & Cognition, 36, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwartz, B. L. (2010). The effects of emotion on tip-of-the-tongue states. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 82–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (2011). Tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) states: Retrieval, behavior, and experience. Memory & Cognition, 39, 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwartz, B. L., & Smith, S. M. (1997). The retrieval of related information influences tip-of-the tongue states. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 68–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz, B. L., Travis, D. M., Castro, A. M., & Smith, S. M. (2000). The phenomenology of real and illusory tip-of-the-tongue states. Memory & Cognition, 28, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Teasdale, J. D., & Russell, M. L. (1983). Differential effects of induced mood on the recall of positive, negative and neutral words. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Young, M. M., Wohl, M. J., Matheson, K., Baumann, S., & Anisman, H. (2008). The desire to gamble: The influence of outcomes on the priming effects of a gambling episode. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne M. Cleary
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andrew M. Huebert
    • 1
  • Katherine L. McNeely-White
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations