Both attentional control and the ability to make remote associations aid spontaneous analogical transfer
- 111 Downloads
Given the widespread belief that analogical processing is an important mechanism for creative problem solving, despite the rarity of spontaneous transfer in laboratory studies, a critical direction for future research is to address which abilities may allow for the spontaneous analogizing between distant (superficially dissimilar) sources and targets. This study explores the role of individual differences in attentional control and the ability to make remote associations and their possible combined effects on spontaneous analogical transfer. Participants attempted to solve Duncker's radiation problem after having been exposed to a distant source as part of an earlier task. Results indicated that both measures of attentional control and the ability to make remote associations uniquely predicted spontaneous transfer between a superficially dissimilar source and target. Further, a critical role was seen for the quality of the representation of the source analog on the likelihood of transfer. The present results affirm that the likelihood of spontaneous transfer depends critically on the quality of the representation for the source, but also suggest that individual differences in the ability to make remote associations may be more conducive to constructing a broader representation of that source than individual differences in attentional control.
KeywordsAnalogy Problem solving Attention Working memory Creativity
This article is based on research conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at the University of Illinois at Chicago and was supported by a Psi Chi Graduate Research Grant to the first author. Thanks to James W. Pellegrino, Michael E. Ragozzino, Benjamin C. Storm, and Thomas C. Ormerod for their advice on this project as members of the dissertation committee and to Andrew Jarosz and other members of the Wiley Lab for discussions about this research. Additional thanks to Daniel Aiello, Krishna Amin, Jamila Broachwala, Raman Dhami, Rick Leonard, Anna Mankowska, Melissa Meinders, Magen Rooney, and Harleen Saini for their help in conducting this research.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-35220.127.116.113 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bearman, C., Ormerod, T. C., Ball, L. J., & Deptula, D. (2011). Explaining away the negative effects of evaluation on analogical transfer: The perils of premature evaluation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 942-959. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.528843 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Beilock, S. L., & DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 983-998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7318.104.22.1683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cho, S., Moody, T. D., Fernandino, L., Mumford, J. A., Poldrack, R. A., Cannon, T. D., Knowlton, B. J. & Holyoak, K. J. (2010). Common and dissociable prefrontal loci associated with component mechanisms of analogical reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp121 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189-217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3422.214.171.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kubricht, J. R., Lu, H., & Holyoak, K. J. (2016). Individual differences in spontaneous analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0687-7.
- Langley, P. & Jones, R. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 177-201). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S.M. Smith, T.B. Ward, & R.A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Morrison, R. G., Doumas, L. A. A., & Richland, L. E. (2011). A computational account of children’s analogical reasoning: balancing inhibitory control in working memory and relational representation. Developmental Science, 14, 516-529. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00999.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morrison, R. G., Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., Chow, T. W., Miller, B. L., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904322984553 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar