Memory & Cognition

, Volume 46, Issue 8, pp 1398–1412 | Cite as

Both attentional control and the ability to make remote associations aid spontaneous analogical transfer

  • Patrick J. CushenEmail author
  • Jennifer Wiley


Given the widespread belief that analogical processing is an important mechanism for creative problem solving, despite the rarity of spontaneous transfer in laboratory studies, a critical direction for future research is to address which abilities may allow for the spontaneous analogizing between distant (superficially dissimilar) sources and targets. This study explores the role of individual differences in attentional control and the ability to make remote associations and their possible combined effects on spontaneous analogical transfer. Participants attempted to solve Duncker's radiation problem after having been exposed to a distant source as part of an earlier task. Results indicated that both measures of attentional control and the ability to make remote associations uniquely predicted spontaneous transfer between a superficially dissimilar source and target. Further, a critical role was seen for the quality of the representation of the source analog on the likelihood of transfer. The present results affirm that the likelihood of spontaneous transfer depends critically on the quality of the representation for the source, but also suggest that individual differences in the ability to make remote associations may be more conducive to constructing a broader representation of that source than individual differences in attentional control.


Analogy Problem solving Attention Working memory Creativity 



This article is based on research conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at the University of Illinois at Chicago and was supported by a Psi Chi Graduate Research Grant to the first author. Thanks to James W. Pellegrino, Michael E. Ragozzino, Benjamin C. Storm, and Thomas C. Ormerod for their advice on this project as members of the dissertation committee and to Andrew Jarosz and other members of the Wiley Lab for discussions about this research. Additional thanks to Daniel Aiello, Krishna Amin, Jamila Broachwala, Raman Dhami, Rick Leonard, Anna Mankowska, Melissa Meinders, Magen Rooney, and Harleen Saini for their help in conducting this research.


  1. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30-60. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer, T., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2016). Cognitive control as a double-edged sword. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 905-915. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141-1152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, U. (2007). The contribution of working memory to children's mathematical word problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 9, 1201-1216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslan, A., & Bauml, K. H. T. (2011). Individual difference in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 264-269. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science. 23, 1117–1122. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, S. M. & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612-637. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bearman, C., Ormerod, T. C., Ball, L. J., & Deptula, D. (2011). Explaining away the negative effects of evaluation on analogical transfer: The perils of premature evaluation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 942-959. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309-319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beilock, S. L., & DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 983-998. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 108-124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blessing, S.B. & Ross, B.H. (1996). Content effects on problem categorization and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 792-810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003a). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 730-737. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003b). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 634-639. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan, J., Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1352-1365. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cho, S., Moody, T. D., Fernandino, L., Mumford, J. A., Poldrack, R. A., Cannon, T. D., Knowlton, B. J. & Holyoak, K. J. (2010). Common and dissociable prefrontal loci associated with component mechanisms of analogical reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 524-533. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delaney, P. F., & Sahakyan, L. (2007). Unexpected costs of high working memory capacity following directed forgetting and contextual change manipulations. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1074-1082. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Duncker, K. (1926). A qualitative (experimental and theoretical) study of productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). Pedagogical Seminary & Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33, 642–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncker, K., (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, i-113. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Francis, W. S. (1999). Analogical transfer of problem solutions within and between languages in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 301-329. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles of visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 61-83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gentner, D., Ratterman, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. George, T., & Wiley, J. (2018). Breaking past the surface: Analogical transfer as creative insight. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight (pp. 143-168). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology 46, 539-550. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative ability in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110-118. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Holyoak, K. J. & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jarosz, A. F., Colflesh, G. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 487-493. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169-183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66-71. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189-217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, S., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Aging and a benefit of distractibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 301-305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kubricht, J. R., Lu, H., & Holyoak, K. J. (2016). Individual differences in spontaneous analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition. doi:
  44. Kurtz, K. J., & Loewenstein, J. (2007). Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: When two problems are better than one. Memory & Cognition, 35, 334-341. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Langley, P. & Jones, R. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 177-201). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306-321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 373-387. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S.M. Smith, T.B. Ward, & R.A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Morrison, R. G., Doumas, L. A. A., & Richland, L. E. (2011). A computational account of children’s analogical reasoning: balancing inhibitory control in working memory and relational representation. Developmental Science, 14, 516-529. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Morrison, R. G., Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., Chow, T. W., Miller, B. L., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 260-271. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Passolunghi, M. C., Carnoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 27, 779-790. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reeves, L. M. & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 381-400. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-273. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Richland, L. E., Chan, T-K., Morrison, R. G., & Au, T. K-F. (2010). Young children’s analogical reasoning across cultures: Similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 146-153. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ricks, T. R., Turley-Ames, K. J., & Wiley, J. (2007). Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1456-1462. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456-468. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swanson, H. L., Cooney, J. B., & Brock, S. (1993). The influence of working memory and classification ability on children’s word problem solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 374-395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taft, R., & Rossiter, J. R. (1966). The Remote Associates Test: Divergent or convergent thinking? Psychological Reports, 19, 1313-1314. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Representations and strategies for solving dynamic and static arithmetic word problems: The role of working memory capacities. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 756-775. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154. Scholar
  64. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104-132. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Viskontas, I. V., Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 581-591. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1205-1212. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 185-227. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMurray State UniversityMurrayUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations