Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 46, Issue 8, pp 1398–1412 | Cite as

Both attentional control and the ability to make remote associations aid spontaneous analogical transfer

  • Patrick J. Cushen
  • Jennifer Wiley
Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

Given the widespread belief that analogical processing is an important mechanism for creative problem solving, despite the rarity of spontaneous transfer in laboratory studies, a critical direction for future research is to address which abilities may allow for the spontaneous analogizing between distant (superficially dissimilar) sources and targets. This study explores the role of individual differences in attentional control and the ability to make remote associations and their possible combined effects on spontaneous analogical transfer. Participants attempted to solve Duncker's radiation problem after having been exposed to a distant source as part of an earlier task. Results indicated that both measures of attentional control and the ability to make remote associations uniquely predicted spontaneous transfer between a superficially dissimilar source and target. Further, a critical role was seen for the quality of the representation of the source analog on the likelihood of transfer. The present results affirm that the likelihood of spontaneous transfer depends critically on the quality of the representation for the source, but also suggest that individual differences in the ability to make remote associations may be more conducive to constructing a broader representation of that source than individual differences in attentional control.

Keywords

Analogy Problem solving Attention Working memory Creativity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is based on research conducted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology at the University of Illinois at Chicago and was supported by a Psi Chi Graduate Research Grant to the first author. Thanks to James W. Pellegrino, Michael E. Ragozzino, Benjamin C. Storm, and Thomas C. Ormerod for their advice on this project as members of the dissertation committee and to Andrew Jarosz and other members of the Wiley Lab for discussions about this research. Additional thanks to Daniel Aiello, Krishna Amin, Jamila Broachwala, Raman Dhami, Rick Leonard, Anna Mankowska, Melissa Meinders, Magen Rooney, and Harleen Saini for their help in conducting this research.

References

  1. Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30-60.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer, T., Campbell, K. L., & Hasher, L. (2016). Cognitive control as a double-edged sword. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 905-915.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1141-1152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00104-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, U. (2007). The contribution of working memory to children's mathematical word problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 9, 1201-1216.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslan, A., & Bauml, K. H. T. (2011). Individual difference in working memory capacity predict retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 264-269.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021324 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science. 23, 1117–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnett, S. M. & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612-637.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.612 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bearman, C., Ormerod, T. C., Ball, L. J., & Deptula, D. (2011). Explaining away the negative effects of evaluation on analogical transfer: The perils of premature evaluation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 942-959.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2010.528843 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 309-319.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beilock, S. L., & DeCaro, M. S. (2007). From poor performance to success under stress: Working memory, strategy selection, and mathematical problem solving under pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 983-998.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.983 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blanchette, I., & Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 108-124.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blessing, S.B. & Ross, B.H. (1996). Content effects on problem categorization and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 792-810.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.792 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003a). Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 730-737. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196539 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2003b). Normative data for 144 compound remote associate problems. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 634-639.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195543 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 499-506.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.499 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1147-1156.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan, J., Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1352-1365. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0227-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cho, S., Moody, T. D., Fernandino, L., Mumford, J. A., Poldrack, R. A., Cannon, T. D., Knowlton, B. J. & Holyoak, K. J. (2010). Common and dissociable prefrontal loci associated with component mechanisms of analogical reasoning. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 524-533.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp121 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Delaney, P. F., & Sahakyan, L. (2007). Unexpected costs of high working memory capacity following directed forgetting and contextual change manipulations. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1074-1082.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193479 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, & B.N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313–334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Duncker, K. (1926). A qualitative (experimental and theoretical) study of productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). Pedagogical Seminary & Journal of Genetic Psychology, 33, 642–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Duncker, K., (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs, 58, i-113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Francis, W. S. (1999). Analogical transfer of problem solutions within and between languages in Spanish-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 301-329.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2000). Differential roles of visuospatial and verbal working memory in situation model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 61-83.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155-170.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gentner, D., Ratterman, M. J., & Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 524-575.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. George, T., & Wiley, J. (2018). Breaking past the surface: Analogical transfer as creative insight. In F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Ed.), Insight (pp. 143-168). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gick, M. L., & Paterson, K. (1992). Do contrasting examples facilitate schema acquisition and analogical transfer? Canadian Journal of Psychology 46, 539-550.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative ability in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110-118.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048280 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Holyoak, K. J. & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition, 15, 332-340. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jarosz, A. F., Colflesh, G. J., & Wiley, J. (2012). Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 487-493.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 169-183.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66-71.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.66 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189-217.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, S., Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (2007). Aging and a benefit of distractibility. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 301-305.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kubricht, J. R., Lu, H., & Holyoak, K. J. (2016). Individual differences in spontaneous analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0687-7.
  44. Kurtz, K. J., & Loewenstein, J. (2007). Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: When two problems are better than one. Memory & Cognition, 35, 334-341.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193454 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Langley, P. & Jones, R. (1988). A computational model of scientific insight. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 177-201). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence, 41, 306-321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, K., Ng, E. L., & Ng, S. F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 373-387.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Martindale, C. (1995). Creativity and connectionism. In S.M. Smith, T.B. Ward, & R.A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 249-268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Morrison, R. G., Doumas, L. A. A., & Richland, L. E. (2011). A computational account of children’s analogical reasoning: balancing inhibitory control in working memory and relational representation. Developmental Science, 14, 516-529.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00999.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Morrison, R. G., Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., Chow, T. W., Miller, B. L., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). A neurocomputational model of analogical reasoning and its breakdown in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 260-271.  https://doi.org/10.1162/089892904322984553 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Passolunghi, M. C., Carnoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers. Memory & Cognition, 27, 779-790.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reeves, L. M. & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 381-400.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 249-273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2006.02.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Richland, L. E., Chan, T-K., Morrison, R. G., & Au, T. K-F. (2010). Young children’s analogical reasoning across cultures: Similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 146-153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ricks, T. R., Turley-Ames, K. J., & Wiley, J. (2007). Effects of working memory capacity on mental set due to domain knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1456-1462.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 456-468.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.456 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer, M., & Ritchot, K. F. M. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733-743.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 271–295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Swanson, H. L., Cooney, J. B., & Brock, S. (1993). The influence of working memory and classification ability on children’s word problem solution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 374-395.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1993.1021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taft, R., & Rossiter, J. R. (1966). The Remote Associates Test: Divergent or convergent thinking? Psychological Reports, 19, 1313-1314.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.3f.1313 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Thevenot, C., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Representations and strategies for solving dynamic and static arithmetic word problems: The role of working memory capacities. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 756-775.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500412270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(89)90040-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104-132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Viskontas, I. V., Morrison, R. G., Holyoak, K. J., Hummel, J. E., & Knowlton, B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19, 581-591.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.4.581 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1205-1212.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). How working memory capacity affects problem solving. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 56, 185-227.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412447622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMurray State UniversityMurrayUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations