Memory & Cognition

, Volume 46, Issue 8, pp 1248–1262 | Cite as

The role of attention in remembering important item-location associations

  • Alexander L. M. SiegelEmail author
  • Alan D. Castel


When encountering an excess of information, people are able to selectively remember high-value information by strategically allocating attention during the encoding period, termed value-directed remembering. This has been demonstrated in both the episodic verbal and visuospatial memory domains. Importantly, the allocation of attention also plays a crucial role in the binding of identity and location information in visuospatial memory. We examined how taxing attentional resources to various degrees during encoding might affect visuospatial memory and selectivity. Participants studied items paired with point values indicating their value in a grid display and were asked to maximize their point score (a summation of the points associated with correctly remembered information). Participants viewed items under either a sequential or simultaneous presentation format and in either the presence or absence of a secondary tone discrimination task. While participants in the divided attention conditions recalled fewer item-location associations overall, participants in all encoding conditions prioritized high-value information in memory, providing further evidence that selectivity can be maintained even when attentional resources are taxed. However, differences between presentation formats emerged when conducting spatial resolution analyses examining errors. Errors in the simultaneous conditions were only influenced by item value when attention was full during encoding, while errors in the sequential conditions were not influenced by item value, regardless of available attentional resources. The results suggest participants can strategically allocate attention during encoding even under cognitively-demanding conditions and that gist-based visuospatial memory may only be influenced by information importance when adequate attentional resources are available.


Divided attention Presentation format Selectivity Visuospatial memory 


Author Note

This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (National Institute on Aging; Award Number R01 AG044335 to Alan Castel). Portions of this work will be presented at the Psychonomic Society’s 58th Annual Meeting in Vancouver, Canada. The authors would like to thank Adam Blake, Brandon Carone, Mary Hargis, Tyson Kerr, Catherine Middlebrooks, and the rest of the members of the Memory and Lifespan Cognition Laboratory at UCLA for their guidance and support throughout this project.


  1. Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 298-313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2014). Evidence for two attentional components in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1499-1509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, R. J., Hitch, G. J., Mate, J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Feature binding and attention in working memory: A resolution of previous contradictory findings. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 2369-2383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ariel, R. (2013). Learning what to learn: The effects of task experience on strategy shifts in the allocation of study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1697-1711.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 432-447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baddeley, A. D., Allen, R. J., & Hitch, G. J. (2011). Binding in visual working memory: The role of the episodic buffer. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1393-1400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Blalock, L. D., & Clegg, B. A. (2010). Encoding and representation of simultaneous and sequential arrays in visuospatial working memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 856-862.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brockmole, J. R., & Logie, R. H. (2013). Age-related change in visual working memory: A study of 55,753 participants aged 8-75. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, L. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2010). The role of attention in binding and visual features in working memory: Evidence from cognitive ageing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2067-2079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Castel, A. D. (2008). The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: Evaluative processing and value-directed remembering. In A. S. Benjamin & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 48, pp. 225-270). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Castel, A. D., Balota, D. A., & McCabe, D. P. (2009). Memory efficiency and the strategic control of attention at encoding: Impairments of value-directed remembering in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuropsychology, 23, 297-306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Castel, A. D., Benjamin, A. S., Craik, F. I. M., & Watkins, M. J. (2002). The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1078-1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castel, A. D., Lee, S. S., Humphreys, K. L., & Moore, A. N. (2011). Memory capacity, selective control, and value-directed remembering in children with and without attention- deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neuropsychology, 25, 15-24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Castel, A. D., McGillivray, S., & Friedman, M. C. (2012). Metamemory and memory efficiency in older adults: Learning about the benefits of priority processing and value-directed remembering. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, & N. Ohta (Eds.), Memory and aging: Current issues and future directions (pp. 245–270). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  15. Castel, A. D., Murayama, K., Friedman, M. C., McGillivray, S., & Link, I. (2013). Selecting valuable information to remember: Age-related differences and similarities in self- regulated learning. Psychology and Aging, 28, 232-242.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, M. S., Rissman, J., Suthana, N. A., Castel, A. D., & Knowlton, B. J. (2014). Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of fronto-temporal semantic processing regions. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 578-592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunlosky, J., Ariel, R., & Thiede, K. W. (2011). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation. In P. Higham (Ed.), Constructions of remembering and metacognition (pp. 182-198). Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2004). Causes and constraints of the shift-to-easier-materials effect in the control of study. Memory & Cognition, 32, 779-788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elsley, J. V., & Parmentier, F. B. (2009). Is verbal–spatial binding in working memory impaired by a concurrent memory load?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1696-1705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Feng, J., Pratt, J., & Spence, I. (2012). Attention and visuospatial working memory share the same processing resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2009). Attentive tracking disrupts feature binding in visual working memory. Visual Cognition, 17, 48-66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu, Y., Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2016). Executive control of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attention in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 2164-2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, Y., Hitch, G. J., Baddeley, A. D., Zhang, M., & Allen, R. J. (2014). Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: Evidence from suffix and strategy effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1665-1678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Iachini, T., Iavarone, A., Senese, V. P., Ruotolo, F., & Ruggiero, G. (2009). Visuospatial memory in healthy elderly, AD and MCI: A review. Current Aging Science, 2, 43-59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting Bayes factors. Journal of Problem Solving, 7, 2-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaswal, S., & Logie, R. H. (2011). Configural encoding in visual feature binding. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 586-603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiang, Y., Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 683-702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, J. S., Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2008). The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 41-55.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lecerf, T., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2005). Recognition in a visuospatial memory task: The effect of presentation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 47-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lilienthal, L., Hale, S., & Myerson, J. (2014). The effects of environmental support and secondary tasks on visuospatial working memory. Memory & Cognition, 42, 1118-1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lorch, R. F., & Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 149-157.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Middlebrooks, C. D., & Castel, A. D. (2017). Self-regulated learning of important information under sequential and simultaneous encoding conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. Google Scholar
  34. Middlebrooks, C. D., Kerr, T. K., & Castel, A. D. (2017). Selectively distracted: Divided attention and memory for important information. Psychological Science. Google Scholar
  35. Middlebrooks, C. D., McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2016). Memory for allergies and health foods: How younger and older adults strategically remember critical health information. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 71, 389-399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Middlebrooks, C. D., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2016). The value in rushing: Memory and selectivity when short on time. Acta Psychologica, 170, 1-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Murayama, K., Sakaki, M., Yan, V. X., & Smith, G. (2014). Type-1 error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: A generalized mixedeffects model perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40, 1287-1306.Google Scholar
  38. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125-141). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Oswald, F. L., McAbee, S. T., Redick, T. S., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2015). The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity. Behavior research methods, 47, 1343-1355.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299-320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2017). Working memory capacity, strategic allocation of study time, and value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 231-244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sahakian, B. J., Morris, R. G., Evenden, J. L., Heald, A., Levy, R., Philpot, M., & Robbins, T. R. (1988). A comparative study of visuospatial memory and learning in Alzheimer-type dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Brain, 111, 695-718.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2018). Memory for important item-location associations in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 33, 30-45. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.Google Scholar
  46. Stefanidi, A., Ellis, D. M., & Brewer, G. A. (2018). Free recall dynamics in value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 100, 18-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, H. A., Thomas, A. K., Artuso, C., & Eastman, C. (2014). Effects of global and local processing on visuospatial working memory. In C. Freksa, B. Nebel, M. Hegarty, & T. Barkowsky (Eds.), Spatial cognition (pp. 14-29). Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Treisman, A. M., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Ueno, T., Allen, R. J., Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Saito, S. (2011). Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 39, 12-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48-64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wong, S., Irish, M., Savage, G., Hodges, J. R., Piguet, O., & Hornberger, M. (2018). Strategic value-directed learning and memory in Alzheimer's disease and behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neuropsychology.

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations