Advertisement

The spatial coding mechanism of ordinal symbols: a study based on the ordinal position effect

  • Wendian ShiEmail author
  • Qiangqiang Wang
  • Fangfang Zhao
  • Xudong Zhao
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The ordinal position effect refers to a phenomenon in which items positioned early in an ordinal sequence receive a faster response with the left key than with the right key, and the opposite response pattern occurs when items are positioned later in an ordinal sequence. Previous studies have suggested that ordinal symbols are spatially represented from left to right, thus leading to the ordinal position effect; however, the spatial coding mechanism of ordinal symbols remains unclear. Therefore, the present study explored the ordinal position effect as an index to judge the spatial coding of ordinal symbols, and three experiments were performed to investigate the spatial coding mechanism of ordinal symbols. In particular, a novel transitory ordinal sequence was induced by presenting successive dots of different colors centrally (Experiment 1), from left to right or from right to left (Experiments 2 and 3), and participants were asked to memorize the successive dots in the correct order. Then, the participants were asked to press a key to provide a response corresponding to a probe dot’s ordinal position (Experiments 1 and 2) or its spatial location (Experiment 3). The following results were identified: (1) The ordinal position effect occurred when responses were based on the ordinal position regardless of the presentation direction, and (2) the ordinal position effect was overridden when responses were based on the spatial locations of the ordinal symbols. From these results, we concluded that the spatial coding of ordinal symbols is flexible and that ordinal symbols are encoded depending on the specific experimental context.

Keywords

SNARC effect Ordinal position effect Polarity Encode Ordinal symbol 

Notes

Funding information

Funding This work was supported by the the postgraduate training program of Shanghai Normal University (209-AC9103-19-368005005).

References

  1. Abrahamse, E., van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2016). How does working memory enable number-induced spatial biases?. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrahamse, E., van Dijck, J. P., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2014). Finding the answer in space: The mental whiteboard hypothesis on serial order in working memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(932), 1–10.Google Scholar
  3. Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., & Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus–response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia, 36(8), 731–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bjork, R. A., & Whitten, W. B. (1974). Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botvinick, M., & Watanabe, T. (2007). From numerosity to ordinal rank: A gain-field model of serial order representation in cortical working memory. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 27(32), 8636–8642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho, Y. S., Bae, G. Y., & Proctor, R. W. (2012). Referential coding contributes to the horizontal SMARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(3), 726–734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus–response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2007). When is an odd number not odd? Influence of task rule on the MARC effect for numeric classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 832–842.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornell, E. H., & Bergstrom, L. I. (1983). Serial-position effects in infants’ recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 11(5), 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 122(3), 371–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darling, S., Allen, R. J., & Havelka, J. (2017). Visuospatial bootstrapping: when visuospatial and verbal memory work together. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodd, M. D., Stigchel, S. V. D., Leghari, M. A., Fung, G., & Kingstone, A. (2008). Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways). Cognition, 108(3), 810–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, M. H., Riello, M., Giordano, B. L., & Rusconi, E. (2013). Singing numbers . . . in cognitive space—A dual-task study of the link between pitch, space, and numbers. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 354–366.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fumarola, A., Prpic, V., Pos, O. D., Murgia, M., Umiltà, C., & Agostini, T. (2014). Automatic spatial association for luminance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(3), 759–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87(3), B87–B95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2004). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized: Evidence from days of the week. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 40(1), 171–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ginsburg, V., Archambeau, K., Van Dijck, J. P., Chetail, F., & Gevers, W. (2017). Coding of serial order in verbal, visual and spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 146(5), 632–650.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ginsburg, V., & Gevers, W. (2015). Spatial coding of ordinal information in short- and long-term memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(8), 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Guida, A., Megreya, A. M., Lavielle-Guida, M., Noël, Y., Mathy, F., Van Dijck, J. P., & Abrahamse, E. (2018). Spatialization in working memory is related to literacy and reading direction: Culture “literarily” directs our thoughts. Cognition, 175, 96–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guo, X., Zhu, L., & Shen, Y. (2008). Influence of perceptual fluency on serial position effect: A comparison among recognition, early/late and picture/word judgment. Journal of Ningbo University (liberal arts edition), 21(6), 99–116.Google Scholar
  22. Holmes, K. J., & Lourenco, S. F. (2011). Common spatial organization of number and emotional expression: a mental magnitude line. Brain & Cognition, 77(2), 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huber, S., Klein, E., Moeller, K., & Willmes, K. (2016). Spatial–numerical and ordinal positional associations coexist in parallel. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishihara, M., Keller, P. E., Rossetti, Y., & Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex: A Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior, 44(4), 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacob, S. N., & Nieder, A. (2008). The ABC of cardinal and ordinal number representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(2), 41–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jin, G., Wang, Y., Wang, L. (2017). The inhibition of Simon effect for spatial-numerical association of response codes effect. Studies of Psychology & Behavior, 15(4), 489–494.Google Scholar
  27. Kirjakovski, A., & Utsuki, N. (2012). From SNARC to SQUARC: Universal mental quantity line?. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(2), 217–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?. Cognition, 88(3), B1–B10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinhas, M., Tzelgov, J., & Ganor-Stern, D. (2012). Estimating linear effects in ANOVA designs: The easy way. Behavior Research Methods, 44(3), 788–794.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Previtali, P., de Hevia, M. D., & Girelli, L. (2010). Placing order in space: The SNARC effect in serial learning. Experimental Brain Research/experimentelle Hirnforschung. expérimentation Cérébrale, 201(3), 599–605.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 416–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Proctor, R. W., & Xiong, A. (2015). Polarity correspondence as a general compatibility principle. Psychological Science, 24(6) 446–451.Google Scholar
  33. Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83(2), 274–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., & Engle, R. W. (2015). Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(6), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Treccani, B., & Umiltà, C. (2011). How to cook a SNARC? Space may be the critical ingredient, after all: A comment on Fischer, Mills, and Shaki (2010). Brain & Cognition, 75(3), 316–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. van Dijck, J. P., Abrahamse, E. L., Majerus, S., & Fias, W. (2013). Spatial attention interacts with serial-order retrieval from verbal working memory. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1854–1859.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations. Cognition, 119(1), 114–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., & Dehaene, S. (2014). The organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1484–1499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang, Q., Kang, J., & Lan, J. (2015). Influence of order information on attention SNARC effect: The study based on letter’s SNARC effect in different reference frames. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 24(4), 291–298.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, Q., Liu, M., Shi, W., & Kang, J. (2018). Mechanism of the SNARC effect in numerical magnitude, time sequence, and spatial sequence tasks: Involvement of LTM and WM. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–12.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, Q., Nie, T., Zhang, W., & Shi, W. (2019). The mechanism of the ordinal position effect: Stability across sense modalities and the hands crossed context. i-Perception, 10(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, M., Gao, X., Li, B., Yu, S., Gong, T., Jiang, T., . . . Chen, Y. (2016). Spatial representation of ordinal information. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendian Shi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qiangqiang Wang
    • 1
  • Fangfang Zhao
    • 2
  • Xudong Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyShanghai Normal UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Hangzhou College of Preschool Teacher EducationZhejiang Normal UniversityZhejiangChina

Personalised recommendations