Advertisement

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 81, Issue 8, pp 2590–2596 | Cite as

The contribution of spatial position and rotated global configuration to contextual cueing

  • Lei ZhengEmail author
  • Stefan Pollmann
Short Report

Abstract

Spatial information can incidentally guide attention to the likely location of a target. This contextual cueing was even observed if only the relative configuration, but not the individual locations of distractor items were repeated or vice versa (Jiang & Wagner in Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 454-463, 2004). The present study investigated the contribution of global configuration and individual spatial location to contextual cueing. Participants repeatedly searched 12 visual search displays in a learning session. In a subsequent transfer session, there were four conditions: fully repeated configurations (same as the displays in the learning session), recombined configurations from two learned configurations with the same target location (preserving distractor locations but not configuration), rotated configurations (preserving configuration but not distractor locations), and new configurations. We could show that contextual cueing occurred if only distractor locations or relative configuration, randomly intermixed, was preserved in a single experiment. Beyond replicating the results of Jiang and Wagner, we made an adjustment to a particular type of transformation – that may have occurred in separate experiments – unlikely. Moreover, contextual cueing in rotated configurations showed that repeated configurations can serve as context cues even without preserved azimuth.

Keywords

Contextual cueing Visual search Spatial position Global configuration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the China Scholarship Council (NO.201808120093).

References

  1. Armstrong, R. A. (2014). When to use the Bonferroni correction. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 34(5), 502-508.  https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12131 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Beesley, T., Vadillo, M. A., Pearson, D., & Shanks, D. R. (2015). Pre-exposure of repeated search configurations facilitates subsequent contextual cuing of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(2), 348-362.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chua, K. P., & Chun, M. M. (2003). Implicit scene learning is viewpoint dependent. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(1), 72-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.  https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0681 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Colagiuri, B., & Livesey, E. J. (2016). Contextual cuing as a form of nonconscious learning: Theoretical and empirical analysis in large and very large samples. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1996-2009.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1063-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 1105-1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang, Y., & Wagner, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cueing—Configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66(3), 454-463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jiang, Y. V., & Swallow, K. M. (2013). Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention. Cognition, 126(3), 378-390.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Rosenbaum, G. M., & Herzig, C. (2013). Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 87-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Shi, Z., Zang, X., Jia, L., Geyer, T., & Müller, H. J. (2013). Transfer of contextual cueing in full-icon display remapping. Journal of Vision, 13(3): 2, 1-10.  https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tsuchiai, T., Matsumiya, K., Kuriki, I., & Shioiri, S. (2012). Implicit learning of viewpoint-independent spatial layouts. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 207.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00207 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Vadillo, M. A., Konstantinidis, E., & Shanks, D. R. (2016). Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 87-102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2011). Statistical evidence in experimental psychology: An empirical comparison using 855 t tests. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 291-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Experimental PsychologyOtto-von-Guericke-UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  2. 2.Center for Behavioral Brain SciencesOtto-von-Guericke-UniversityMagdeburgGermany
  3. 3.Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and School of PsychologyCapital Normal UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations