Visual noise consisting of X-junctions has only a minimal adverse effect on object recognition
- 30 Downloads
In 1968, Guzman showed that the myriad of surfaces composing a highly complex and novel assemblage of volumes can readily be assigned to their appropriate volumes in terms of the constraints offered by the vertices of coterminating edges. Of particular importance was the L-vertex, produced by the cotermination of two contours, which provides strong evidence for the termination of a 2-D surface. An X-junction, formed by the crossing of two contours without a change of direction at the crossing, played no role in the segmentation of a scene. If the potency of noise elements to affect recognition performance reflects their relevancy to the segmentation of scenes, as was suggested by Guzman, gaps in an object’s contours bounded by irrelevant X-junctions would be expected to have little or no adverse effect on shape-based object recognition, whereas gaps bounded by L-junctions would be expected to have a strong deleterious effect when they disrupt the smooth continuation of contours. Guzman’s roles for the various vertices and junctions have never been put to systematic test with respect to human object recognition. By adding identical noise contours to line drawings of objects that produced either L-vertices or X-junctions, these shape features could be compared with respect to their disruption of object recognition. Guzman’s insights that irrelevant L-vertices should be highly disruptive and irrelevant X-vertices would have only a minimal deleterious effect were confirmed.
KeywordsPerceptual organization Shape perception Vertices Nonaccidental properties
Open Practice Statement
The data have been deposited in the Open Science Framework, osf.io.
This research was funded by the Dornsife Research Fund.
- Geirhos, R., Rubisch, P., Michaelis, C., Bethge, M., Wichmann, F. A., & Brendel, W. (2019). ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12231
- Guzman, A, (1968). Computer recognition of three-dimensional objects in a visual scene (Ph.D. dissertation). Dept. of Electrical Engineering, MIT.Google Scholar
- Huffman, D. (1971). Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. In B. Meltzer & D. Michie (Eds.), Machine intelligence 6. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028347 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., & Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Suppl.), 14Google Scholar
- Lüdecke, D. (2018). sjPlot: Data visualization for statistics in social science. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sjPlot
- Malach, R., Reppas, J. B., Benson, R. R., Kwong, K. K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W. A., & Tootell, R. B. (1995). Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92, 8135–8139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.18.8135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wickham, H. (2017). tidyverse: Easily install and load the “Tidyverse” (R package version 1.2.1). Retrieved from https://www.tidyverse.org/