Advertisement

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics

, Volume 80, Issue 8, pp 1974–1987 | Cite as

Continuous flash suppression and monocular pattern masking impact subjective awareness similarly

  • J. D. Knotts
  • Hakwan Lau
  • Megan A. K. Peters
Article
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

Peters and Lau (eLife, 4, e09651, 2015) found that when criterion bias is controlled for, there is no evidence for unconscious visual perception in normal observers, in the sense that they cannot directly discriminate a target above chance without knowing it. One criticism of that study is that the visual suppression method used, forward and backward masking (FBM), may be too blunt in the way it interferes with visual processing to allow for unconscious forced-choice discrimination. To investigate this question, we compared FBM directly to continuous flash suppression (CFS) in a two-interval forced-choice task. Although CFS is popular, and may be thought of as a more powerful visual suppression technique, we found no difference in the degree of perceptual impairment between the two suppression types. To the extent that CFS impairs perception, both objective discrimination and subjective awareness are impaired to similar degrees under FBM. This pattern was consistently observed across three experiments in which various experimental parameters were varied. These findings provide evidence for an ongoing debate about unconscious perception: normal observers cannot perform forced-choice discrimination tasks unconsciously.

Keywords

Visual awareness Binocular vision: Rivalry/ Bistable Perception visual perception 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (U.S.) to H.L. (Grant No. R01NS088628), and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to J.D.K.

References

  1. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2010). The role of the dorsal visual processing stream in tool identification. Psychological Science, 21, 772–778.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610371343 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Almeida, J., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2008). Unconscious processing dissociates along categorical lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 15214–15218.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805867105 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Almeida, J., Pajtas, P. E., Mahon, B. Z., Nakayama, K., & Caramazza, A. (2013). Affect of the unconscious: Visually suppressed angry faces modulate our decisions. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 94–101.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0133-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barthelmé, S., & Mamassian, P. (2009). Evaluation of objective uncertainty in the visual system. PLOS Computational Biology, 5(9).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000504 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthelmé, S., & Mamassian, P. (2010). Flexible mechanisms underlie the evaluation of visual confidence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(48). 20834–20839.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007704107 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Breitmeyer, B. G. (2015). Psychophysical "blinding" methods reveal a functional hierarchy of unconscious visual processing.Conscious and Cognition, S1053-8100(15)00014-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breitmeyer, B. G., Koç, A., Ögmen, H., & Ziegler, R. (2008). Functional hierarchies of nonconscious visual processing. Vision Research, 48, 1509–1513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.03.015 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakravarthi, R., & Cavanagh, P. (2009). Recovery of a crowded object by masking the flankers: Determining the locus of feature integration. Journal of Vision, 9(10):4, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1167/9.10.4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. de Gardelle, V., & Mamassian, P. (2014). Does confidence use a common currency across two visual tasks? Psychological Science, 25(6),1286–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614528956 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksen, C. W. (1960). Discrimination and learning without awareness: A methodological survey and evaluation. Psychological Review 67:279–300.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041622 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faivre, N., Berthet, V., & Kouider, S. (2012). Nonconscious influences from emotional faces: A comparison of visual crowding, masking, and continuous flash suppression. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 129.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Faivre, N., Berthet, V., & Kouider, S. (2014). Sustained invisibility through crowding and continuous flash suppression: A comparative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fleming, S. M., & Lau, H. C. (2014). How to measure metacognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giles, N., Lau, H., & Odegaard, B. (2016). What type of awareness does binocular rivalry assess ? Developmental topographical disorientation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 719–720.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. Hannula, D. E., Simons, D. J., & Cohen, N. J. (2005). Imaging implicit perception: Promise and pitfalls. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6(3), 247–255.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1630 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris, J. A., Wu, C.T., & Woldorff, M. G. (2011). Sandwich masking eliminates both visual awareness of faces and face-specific brain activity through a feedforward mechanism. Journal of Vision, 11(7), 3. 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1167/11.7.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hesselmann, G., Hebart, M., & Malach, R. (2011). Differential BOLD activity associated with subjective and objective reports during “blindsight” in normal observers. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 31(36), 12936–12944.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1556-11.2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Izatt, G., Dubois, J., Faivre, N., & Koch, C. (2014). A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 659.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00659 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang, Y., Costello, P., & He, S. (2007). Processing of invisible stimuli: Advantage of upright faces and recognizable words in overcoming interocular suppression. Psychological Science, 18(4),349–355.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01902.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kingdom, F. A. A., & Prins, N. (2010). Psychophysics: A practical introduction. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  22. Koizumi, A., Maniscalco, B., & Lau, H. (2015). Does perceptual confidence facilitate cognitive control ? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1295–1306.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0843-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolb, F. C., & Braun, J. (1995). Blindsight in normal observers. Nature, 377, 336–338  https://doi.org/10.1038/377336a0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 857–875.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakens, D., McLatchie, N., Isager, P. M., Scheel, A. M., & Dienes, Z. (2018). Improving Inferences about null effects with Bayes factors and equivalence tests. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby065.
  26. Lamy, D., Salti, M., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2008). Neural correlates of subjective awareness and unconscious processing : An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7) 1435–1446.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landau, A. N., & Fries, P. (2012). Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology, 22(11), 1000–1004.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.03.054 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lau, H. (2008). Are we studying consciousness yet? Frontiers of Consciousness: Chichele Lectures, 340.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233151.001.0001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lau, H., & Passingham, R. (2006). Relative blindsight in normal observers and the neural correlate of visual consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(49), 18763–18768.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607716103 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lau, H., & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 365–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lloyd, D. A., Abrahamyan, A., Harris, J. A., & Antal, A. (2013). Brain-stimulation induced blindsight: Unconscious vision or response bias? PLOS One, 8, e82828.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082828.g006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Macknik, S. L., & Livingstone, M. S. (1998). Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neuroscience, 1(2), 144–149.  https://doi.org/10.1038/393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide. London, UK: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maniscalco, B., Peters, M. A., & Lau, H. (2016). Heuristic use of perceptual evidence leads to dissociation between performance and metacognitive sensitivity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(3), 923–37.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1059-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merikle, P., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2001). Perception without awareness: Perspectives from cognitive psychology. Cognition, 79, 115–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00126-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miles, W. R. (1930). Ocular dominance in human adults. The Journal of General Psychology, 3, 412–420.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.1930.9918218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan, M. J., Mason, A. J. S., & Solomon, J. A. (1997). Blindsight in normal subjects? Nature, 385, 401–402.  https://doi.org/10.1038/385401b0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nachmias, J., & Weber, A. (1975). Discrimination of simple and complex gratings. Vision Research, 15, 217–223. : https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(75)90210-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Peremen, Z., & Lamy, D. (2014). Comparing unconscious processing during continuous flash suppression and meta-contrast masking just under the limen of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 969.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00969 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Peters, M. A., Kentridge, R. W., Phillips, I., & Block, N. (2017). Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 3(1), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/nix015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peters, M. A., & Lau, H. (2015). Human observers have optimal introspective access to perceptual processes even for visually masked stimuli. eLife, 4, e09651.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09651
  42. Phillips, I. (2017). Unconscious perception reconsidered. Retrieved from http://www.ianbphillips.com/uploads/2/2/9/4/22946642/antwerp.pdf.
  43. Phillips, I., & Block, N. (2016). Debate on unconscious perception. In B. Nanay (Ed.), Current controversies in philosophy of perception (pp. 165–92). New York, NY: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/philo/faculty/block/papers/2016.debate.pdf Google Scholar
  44. Salti, M., Monto, S., Charles, L., King, J.R., Parkkonen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2015). Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts. eLife, 4, e05652.  https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05652 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Snodgrass, M., & Shevrin, H. (2006). Unconscious inhibition and facilitation at the objective detection threshold. Cognition 101(1), 43–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.06.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Stein, T., Hebart, M. N., & Sterzer, P. (2011). Breaking continuous flash suppression: A new measure of unconscious processing during interocular suppression? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 167.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas, J. P., Gille, J., & Barker, R. A. (1982). Simultaneous visual detection and identification: Theory and data. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 72, 1642–1651.  https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.001642 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tsuchiya, N., & Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1096–101.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1500 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(2), 113–120.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202828 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watson, A. B., & Robson, J. G. (1981). Discrimination at threshold: Labelled detectors in human vision. Vision Research, 21:1115–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(81)90014-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Knotts
    • 1
  • Hakwan Lau
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Megan A. K. Peters
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Brain Research InstituteUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  4. 4.Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA
  5. 5.Interdepartmental Graduate Program in NeuroscienceUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations