Advertisement

Animal learning & behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 390–400 | Cite as

Comparison of various flooding procedures in reducing fear and in extinguishing jump-up avoidance responding

  • Stephanie Miller
  • Susan Mineka
  • Michael Cook
Article
  • 244 Downloads

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effectiveness of three variations in flooding techniques on hastening extinction of a jump-up avoidance response (Experiment 1) and on reducing fear (Experiment 2) as assessed by the multivariate fear-assessment techniques of Corriveau and Smith (1978). Traditional flooding involved blocking the subject’s response by making the safety ledge unavailable; barrier flooding involved inserting a Plexiglas barrier in front of the safety ledge to make it inaccessible and moving the wall periodically during treatment; no-barrier flooding involved allowing subjects to jump onto the ledge periodically but, if they did so, immediately dumping them back onto the grids. In both experiments, all three flooding treatments were found to be more effective than a home cage treatment, although the no-barrier procedure was significantly more effective than the other two. In addition, activity measures revealed interesting and significant group differences in the patterns of activity shown during treatment.

References

  1. Baum, M. Extinction of an avoidance response following response-prevention: Some parametric investigations.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1969,23, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baum, M. Extinction of avoidance responding through response prevention (flooding).Psychological Bulletin, 1970,74, 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, M. Extinction of avoidance behavior: Comparison of various flooding procedures in rats.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1973,1, 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman, J. S., &Katzev, R. D. Factors involved in the rapid elimination of avoidance behavior.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1972,10, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolles, R. C. Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning.Psychological Review, 1970,77, 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corriveau, D. P., &Smith, N. F. Fear reduction and “safety-test” behavior following response-prevention: A multivariate analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1978,107, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coulter, X., Riccio, D. C., &Page, H. A. Effects of blocking an instrumental avoidance response: Facilitated extinction but persistence of “fear.”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1969,68, 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greist, J., Marks, I., Berlin, F., Gournay, K., &Noshirvani, H. Avoidance versus confrontation of fear.Behavior Therapy, 1980,11, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kamin, L. J., Brimer, C. J., &Black, A. H. Conditioned suppression as a monitor of fear of the CS in the course of avoidance training.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1963,56, 497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mineka, S. The role of fear in theories of avoidance learning, flooding and extinction.Psychological Bulletin, 1979,86, 985–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mineka, S., &Gino, A. Dissociative effects of different types and amounts of non-reinforced CS exposure on avoidance extinction and the CER.Learning and Motivation, 1979,10, 141–160.(a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mineka, S., &Gino, A. Some further tests of the brief confinement effect and the SSDR account of flooding.Learning and Motivation, 1979,10, 98–115. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mineka, S., &Gino, A. Dissociation between CER and extended avoidance performance.Learning and Motivation, 1980,11, 476–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mineka, S., Miller, S., Gino, A., &Giencke, L. Dissociative effects of flooding on a multivariate assessment of fear reduction and on jump-up avoidance extinction.Learning and Motivation, 1981,12, 435–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morokoff, P. J., &Timberlake, W. Cue exposure and overt fear responses as determinants of extinction of avoidance in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,77, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Polin, A. T. The effect of flooding and physical suppression as extinction techniques on an anxiety-motivated avoidance locomotor response.Journal of Psychology, 1959,47, 253–255.Google Scholar
  17. Shipley, R. H., Mock, L. A., &Levis, D. J. Effects of several response prevention procedures on activity, avoidance responding, and conditioned fear in rats.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 1971,77, 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Starr, M. D., &Mineka, S. Determinants of fear over the course of avoidance learning.Learning and Motivation, 1977,8, 332–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tinsley, H., &Weiss, D. Interrater reliability and agreement of subjective judgments.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1975,22, 358–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Miller
    • 1
  • Susan Mineka
    • 1
  • Michael Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WisconsinMadison

Personalised recommendations