Advertisement

Animal learning & behavior

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 358–364 | Cite as

On metaknowledge in the pigeon: An organism’s knowledge about its own behavior

  • Charles P. Shimp
Article

Abstract

In two experiments, pigeons pecked side keys in a discrete-trials setting in which shorter and longer runs of successive pecks on the left key before a switch to the right key occasionally produced, after a brief retention interval, a short-term memory probe for the most recent run length. In Experiment 1, a probe involved red and green side keys. A peck to a green (red) key was reinforced if the previous run length was shorter (longer). The dependent variable was the probability of a peck to the correct color. In Experiment 2, a probe involved an autoshaping procedure in which a response-noncontingent reinforcer was delivered after a 5-sec presentation of a green (red) center key if the previous run had been a shorter (longer) one. A reinforcer was not delivered when a red key followed a shorter pattern or a green key followed a longer pattern. The production of runs conformed to many previous molecular data on the way the local temporal patterning of behavior adapts to, that is, displays knowledge of, a reinforcement contingency. The probe results showed that a pigeon can report which of two run lengths it recently has emitted. Thus, a pigeon can, in a sense, describe its own adaptive behavior. Since the adaptive behavioral patterning on the center key may be said to represent knowledge, and since the probe behavior is a self-characterization or self-report by the organism about this knowledge, the probe behavior may be said to represent knowledge about knowledge, or metaknowledge. The data extend previous work on metaknowledge in the pigeon to a third type of adaptive temporal pattern of behavior, that is, run length (instead of response duration and interresponse time), and provide a second type of probe procedure, that is, autoshaping, by means of which a nonverbal organism can be asked what it knows about what it is doing to adapt to an environmental contingency.

References

  1. Brown, A. L. The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In H. W. Reese (Ed.),Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  2. D’Amato, M. R. Delayed matching and short-term memory in monkeys. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 7). New York: Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. Gazzaniga, M. S. The bisected brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. Hawkes, L., &Shimp, C. P. Choice between response rates.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 109–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981,110, 306–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson, T. D. Interresponse time as a stimulus: Discrimination and emission of interresponse time by pigeons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maine, 1974.Google Scholar
  7. Nelson, K. R., &Wasserman, E. A. Temporal factors influencing the pigeon’s successive matching-to-sample performance: Sample duration, intertriai interval, and retention interval.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1978,30, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nisbett, R. E., &Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review, 1977,84, 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Reber, A. S. Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1967,6, 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Restle, F., &Brown, E. Organization of serial pattern learning. In O. H. Bower (Ed.),Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  11. Rorty, T. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Shimp, C. P. Probabilistically reinforced choice behavior in pigeons.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1966,9, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shimp, C. P. Magnitude and frequency of reinforcement and frequencies of interresponse times.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1968,11, 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shimp, C. P. The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: The relative frequency of an interresponse time equals its relative harmonic length.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969,12, 403–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shimp, C. P. The concurrent reinforcement of two interresponse times: Absolute rate of reinforcement.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,13, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shimp, C. P. Perspectives on the behavioral unit: Choice behavior in animals. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.Google Scholar
  17. Shimp, C. P. Organization in memory and behavior.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1976,26, 113–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shimp, C. P. The local organization of behavior: Method and theory. In M. D. Zeiler & P. Harzern (Eds.),Advances in analysis of behavior (Vol. 1):Reinforcement and the organization of behavior. Chichester, England: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar
  19. Shimp, C. P. The local organization of behavior: Discrimination of and memory for simple behavioral patterns.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1981,36, 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shimp, C. P. Choice and behavioral patterning.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1982,37, 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shimp, C. P. Reinforcement and the local organization of behavior. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & H. Rachlin (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior (Vol. 2):Matching and maximizing accounts. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger, in press.Google Scholar
  22. Shimp, C. P., &Hawkes, L. Time-allocation, matching and contrast.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974,22, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wasserman, E. A., Nelson, K. R., &Larew, M. B. Memory for sequences of stimuli and responses.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1980,34, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ziriax, J. M., &Silberberg, A. Discrimination and emission of different key-peck durations in the pigeon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1978,4, 1–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles P. Shimp
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of UtahSalt Lake City

Personalised recommendations