Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The semen quality of the mobile phone users

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The increased use of mobile phones, the media’s attention for general health, and the increase of idiopathic male infertility suggest to investigate the possible consequences of an excessive use of mobile phones on semen quality. Aim: To evaluate the conventional and some of the main biofunctional sperm parameters in healthy men according to the different use of the mobile phone. Subjects and methods: All the enrolled subjects in this study were divided into four groups according to their active cell phone use: group A= no use (no.=10 subjects); group B= <2 h/day (no.=16); group C= 2–4 h/day (no.=17); and group D= >4 h/day (no.=20). Among the subjects of the group D (>4 h/day), a further evaluation was made between the “trousers users”(no.=12) and “shirt users”(no.=8), and they underwent semen collection to evaluate conventional and biofunctional sperm parameters (density, total count, morphology, progressive motility, apoptosis, mithocondrial membrane potential, chromatin compaction, DNA fragmentation). Results: None of the conventional sperm parameters examined were significantly altered. However, the group D and the trousers users showed a higher percentage of sperm DNA fragmentation compared to other groups. Conclusion: These results suggest that the sperm DNA fragmentation could represent the only parameter significantly altered in the subjects who use the mobile phone for more than 4 h/day and in particular for those who use the device in the pocket of the trousers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Depinder F, Makkler K, Agarwal A. Cell phones and male infertility: dissecting the relationship. Reprod Biomed Online 2007, 3: 266–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Conclusions on mobile phones and radio frequency fields. European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR). http://ec.europa.eu/health/opinions2/en/electromagnetic-fields/l-3/5-conclusions-mobile-phones.htm

  3. Worldwide mobile phone sales fell in 2012: Gartner. February 13, 2013. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/us-mobilephones-gartner-idUSBRE91C0G120130213

  4. McLachlan RI. Approach to the patient with oligozoospermia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013, 98: 873–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kesari KK, Behari J. Evidence for mobile phone radiation exposure effects on reproductive pattern of male rats: role of ROS. Electromagn Biol Med 2012, 31: 213–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Mobile phone usage and male infertility in Wistar rats. Indian J Exp Biol 2010, 48: 987–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic wave exposure from cellular phones on the reproductive pattern in male Wistar rats. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2011; 164: 546–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Imai N, Kawabe M, Hikage T, Nojima T, Takahashi S, Shirai T. Effects on rat testis of 1.95-GHz W-CDMA for IMT-2000 cellular phones. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2011, 57: 204–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Salama N, Kishimoto T, Kanayama HO, Kagawa S. The mobile phone decreases fructose but not citrate in rabbit semen: a longitudinal study. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2009, 55: 181–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mailankot M, Kunnath AP, Jayalekshmi H, Koduru B, Valsalan R. Radio frequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHz) mobile phones induces oxidative stress and reduces sperm motility in rats. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009, 64: 561–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Salama N, Kishimoto T, Kanayama HO. Effects of exposure to a mobile phone on testicular function and structure in adult rabbit. Int JAndrol 2010, 33: 88–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM, King BV. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int J Androl 2005, 28: 171–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gutschi T, Mohamad Al-Ali B, Shamloul R, Pummer K, Trummer H. Impact of cell phone use on men’s semen parameters. Andrologia 2011, 43: 312–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Falzone N, Huyser C, Franken DR, Leszczynski D. Mobile phone radiation does not induce pro-apoptosis effects in human spermatozoa. Radiat Res 2010, 174: 169–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009, 92: 1318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertil Steril 2008, 89: 124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 2009, 4: e6446.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Erogul O, Oztas E, Yildirim I, et al. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: an in vitro study. Arch Med Res 2006, 37: 840–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fejes I, Závaczki Z, Szöllosi J, et al. Is there a relationship between cell phone use and semen quality? Arch Androl 2005, 51: 385–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of the exposure to mobile phones on male reproduction: a review of the literature. J Androl 2012, 33: 350–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahmoud A, Comhaire F. Systemic causes of male infertility. In: Andrology for the Clinician. Springer, 2006, 57–63.

  22. Jarow JP. Endocrine causes of male infertility. Urol Clin North Am 2003, 30: 83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. La Vignera S, Vicari E, Condorelli RA, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. Male accessory gland infection and sperm parameters (review). Int JAndrol 2011, 34: 330–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. La Vignera S, Calogero AE, Condorelli R, et al. Criptorchidism and its long term complications. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2009, 13: 351–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. La Vignera S, Condorelli R, Vicari E, D’Agata R, Calogero AE. Effects of varicocelectomy on sperm DNA fragmentation, mitochondrial function, chromatin condensation, and apoptosis. J Androl 2012, 33: 389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakamoto H, Ogawa Y, Yoshida Y. Relationship between testicular volume and testicular function: comparison of the Prader orchidometric and ultrasonographic measurements in patients with infertility. Asian J Androl 2008, 10: 319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Calogero AE, Polosa R, Perdichizzi A, et al. Cigarette smoke extract immobilizes human spermatozoa and induces sperm apoptosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2009, 19: 564–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Balercia G, Vicari E, Calogero AE. Does alcohol have any effect on male reproductive function ? A review of literature. Asian J Androl 2013, 15: 221–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dandona P, Rosenberg MT. A pratical guide to male hypogonadism in the primary care setting. Int J Clin Pract 2010, 64: 682–96.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cooper DS. Subclinical hypothyroidism. N Engl J Med 2001, 345: 260–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Vicari E, Calogero AE. Negative effect of increased body weight on sperm conventional and nonconventional flow cytometric sperm parameters. J Androl 2012, 33: 53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lotti F, Corona G, Colpi GM, et al. Elevated body mass index correlates with higher seminal plasma interleukin 8 levels and ultrasonographic abnormalities of the prostate in men attending an andrology clinic for infertility. J Endocrinol Invest 2011, 34: 336–42.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Calogero A, Polosa R, Perdichizzi A, et al. Cigarette smoke extract immobilizes human spermatozoa and induces sperm apoptosis. Reprod Biomed Online 2009, 19: 564–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, Fifth ed. Geneva: WHO, 2010.

  35. Pilatz A, Rusz A, Wagenlehner L, Weidner W, Altinkilic B. Reference values for testicular volume, epididymal head size and peak systolic velocity of the testicular artery in adult males measured by ultrasonography. Ultraschall in der Medizin 2012, 34: 349–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vicari E. Seminal leukocyte concentration and related specific reactive oxygen species production in patients with male accessory gland infections. Hum Reprod 1999, 14: 2025–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Behre HM, Kliesch S, Schädel F, Nieschlag E. Clinical relevance of scrotal and transrectal ultrasonography in andrological patients. Int J Androl 1995, 18: 27–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lotti F, Corona G, Mancini M, et al. Ultrasonographic and clinical correlates of seminal plasma interleukin-8 levels in patients attending an andrology clinic for infertility. Int J Androl 2011, 34: 600–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Perdichizzi A, Nicoletti F, La Vignera S, et al. Effects of tumour necrosis factor-alpha on human sperm motility and apoptosis. J Clin Immunol 2007, 27: 152–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Manicardi GC, Bianchi PG, Pantano S, et al. Presence of endogenous nicks in DNA of ejaculated human spermatozoa and its relationship to chromomycin A3 accessibility. Biol Reprod 1995, 52: 864–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sailer BL, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl 1995, 16: 80–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sakkas D, Moffatt O, Manicardi GC, Mariethoz E, Tarozzi N, Bizzaro D. Nature of DNA damage in ejaculated human spermatozoa and the possible involvement of apoptosis. Biol Reprod 2002, 66: 1061–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Moustafa MH, Sharma RK, Thornton J, et al. Relationship between ROS production, apoptosis and DNA denaturation in spermatozoa from patients examined for infertility. Hum Reprod 2004, 19: 129–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahmad G, Moinard N, Esquerré-Lamare C, Mieusset R, Bujan L. Mild induced testicular and epididymal hyperthermia alters sperm chromatin integrity in men. Fertil Steril 2012, 97: 546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Unit of Andrology and Pathophysiology of Reproduction, S.M. Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy

    R. Rago, P. Salacone, L. Caponecchia, A. Sebastianelli & I. Marcucci

  2. Section of Endocrinology, Andrology and Internal Medicine, Department of Medical and Pediatric Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    A. E. Calogero, R. Condorelli, E. Vicari, A. F. Arcoria & S. La Vignera

  3. Department of Urology, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

    G. Morgia, V. Favilla & S. Cimino

Authors
  1. R. Rago
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Salacone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. L. Caponecchia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Sebastianelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Marcucci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. E. Calogero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Condorelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Vicari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. G. Morgia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. V. Favilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. S. Cimino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. A. F. Arcoria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. S. La Vignera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. La Vignera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rago, R., Salacone, P., Caponecchia, L. et al. The semen quality of the mobile phone users. J Endocrinol Invest 36, 970–974 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3275/8996

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3275/8996

Key-words

Search

Navigation