Non-Contact Triangulation Measurement of Distances to Mirror Surfaces

  • M. M. Mordasov
  • A. P. Savenkov
  • M. E. Safonova
  • V. A. Sychev
Optical Information Technologies
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

Metrological analysis of triangulation laser sensors for measuring distance to mirror surfaces was performed. Theoretical and experimental studies have established that the measurement range of distance depends on the angle of incidence of the laser beam, and the main factor that affects the measurement accuracy is the rotation of the sensor in the plane of incidence. A non-contact sensor for measuring distance to liquid surfaces which provides signaling upon reaching a prescribed value is designed. An overview of triangulation measurement systems is given.

Keywords

triangulation systems mirror surfaces geometric parameters distance signaling error 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. N. Baibakov, V. I. Ladygin, A. I. Pastushenko, et al., “Laser Triangulation Position Sensors in Industrial Control and Diagnostic Systems,” Avtometriya 40, (2), 105–113 (2004).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. T. Liebe and K. Coste, “Distance Measurement Utilizing Image-Based Triangulation,” IEEE Sensors J. 13 (1), 234–244 (2013). DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2012.2212428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. R. Bulychev and E. N. Chepel, “Quasi-Optimal Method for Solving the Triangulation Problem in Priori Uncertainty,” Avtometriya 53 (6), 83–91 (2017) [Optoelectron., Instrum. Data Process. 53 (6), 604–611 (2017)].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. V. Mikhlyaev, “Triangulation Sensing of Melt Surface During Crystal Growth,” Avtometriya 39 (5), 30–41 (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Haw and G. Kercheck, “Dual Beam Non-Contact Displacement Sensor,” US Pat. 9228878. Publ. 05.01.2016.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.-G. Lierke, W. M. Heide, and M. Achatz, “Verfahren zur Berührungslosen Messung der Oberflächenspannung und der Viskosität,” DE Pat. 2836972. Offenlegungstag 06.03.1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. M. Mordasov and A. P. Savenkov, “Non-Contact Non-Destructive Aerohydrodynamic monitoring of Liquid Viscosity,” Zavodksaya Laboratoriya. Diagnostika Materialov 74 (2), 22–25 (2008).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Xu, D. Yan, Ya. Wang, and K. Ju, “Research of the Liquid Level Detection System for Integral Stereolithography System,” Appl. Mech. Mater. 347–350, 32–35 (2013). DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.347-350.32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. Mruk, M. Adams, W. Kilkerr, et al.,“Optical Non-Contact Sensor for Detecting Material Level in a Container,” US Pat. 7399985. Publ. 17.01.2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Q. Li, N. Song, and D. Liu, “Device and Method for Detecting Liquid Level of Molten Silicon Using Laser Reflected from Curved Mirror,” US Pat. 8785898. Publ. 22.07.2014.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ch. King, “Optical Level Measurement System,” US Pat. 4963731. Publ. 16.10.1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Zhang and B. H. Zhuang, “Non-Contact Measurement of Scratches on Aircraft Skins and Windows,” Proc. SPIE 3204, 90–94 (1997). DOI: 10.1117/12.294445.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. V. Mikhlyaev, “Analysis of Optical Triangulation Systems for Measuring Mirror Surface Profiles,” Avtometriya 41 (4), 78–91 (2005).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. V. Mikhlyaev, “Influence of a Tilt of Mirror Surface on the Measurement Accuracy of Laser Triangulation Rangefinder,” J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 48, 739–744 (2006). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/48/1/140.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. N. Baibakov, K. I. Kuchinskii, S. V. Plotnikov, and E. A. Titova, “Position-Sensitive Photodetectors in Triangulation Dimensional Inspection System for Dynamic Objects,” Avtometriya 41 (6), 53–61 (2005).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Tao and W. Liu, “Measurement System for Liquid Level Based on Laser Triangulation and Angular Tracking,” J. Computers. 5 (9), 1444–1447 (2010). DOI: 10.4304/jcp.5.9.1444-1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. H. Ross and E. C. Hayes, “Method and Apparatus for Water Level Determination,” US Pat. 6545286. Publ. 08.04.2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. P. Savenkov and M. E. Safonova, “A Non-Contact Sensor of Distance to a Liquid surface,” in Proc. of the 3rd Intern. Sci. and Practical Conf. of Young Scientists ”The World of Science without Borders” (TSTU, Tambov, 2016), pp. 128–132.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. P. Kiryanov, A. V. Kiryanov, and V. V. Chukanov, “Using the Differential Method of Measurement to Control the Accuracy of Precision Angle Measuring Structures,” Avtometriya 52 (4), 45–52 (2016) [Optoelectron., Instrum. Data Process. 52 (4), 354–359 (2016)].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. V. Mishchenko, P. V. Balabanov, A. A. Krimshtein, and S. V. Ponomarev, “Dynamics of Chemical Adsorption with Regenerative Substances on the Basis of Superoxides of Alkaline Metal and Absorbers,” Vestn. TGTU 16 (4), 870–881 (2010). DOI: 10.17217/issn.0136-5835.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Mordasov
    • 1
  • A. P. Savenkov
    • 1
  • M. E. Safonova
    • 1
  • V. A. Sychev
    • 1
  1. 1.Tambov State Technical UniversityTambovRussia

Personalised recommendations