Advertisement

Russian Engineering Research

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 233–237 | Cite as

Selection of metal-cutting machines in operational design by means of PLM systems

  • P. N. Krestyaninov
  • R. M. Khusainov
  • S. Yu. Yurasov
  • V. A. Grechishnikov
  • V. B. Romanov
Article

Abstract

A method is proposed for the selection of metal-cutting machines in the design of technological operations using Teamcenter and UNIGRAPHICS NX software.

Keywords

metal-cutting machines production planning Teamcenter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rekomendatsii ESTPP R 50-54-11-87. Obshchie polozheniya po vyboru, proektirovaniyu i primeneniyu sredstv tekhnologicheskogo osnashcheniya (Recommendations ESTPP R 50-54-11-87: General Provisions on the Selection, Design, and Implementation of Technological Equipment Means), Moscow: Rotaprint, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nguyen, H.-T., Zawiah, S., Dawal, M., Nukman, Y., and Aoyama, H., A hybrid approach for fuzzy multiattribute decision making in machine tool selection with consideration of the interactions of attributes, Exp. Syst. Appl., 2004, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 3078–3090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ayag, Z. and Özdemir, R.G., Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2012, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 630–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Petukhov, Yu.E., Pivkin, P.M., Isaev, A.V., Romanov, V.B., and Domnin, P.V., Lathe turning of complex-shaped parts providing desired surface microrelief, Russ. Eng. Res., 2016, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Petukhov, Y.E., Pivkin, P.M., Isaev, A.V., et al., Prediction and measurement of the parameters of the microtopography of a surface when turning intricately shaped parts, Meas. Tech., 2015, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 848–853.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vedmid’, P.A. and Sulinov, A.V., Programmirovanie obrabotki v NXCAM (Programming of Processes in NXCAM), Moscow: DMK Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grigor’ev, S.N., Prospective development of Join Federal Engineering Center of machine engineering on the basis of Moscow State Technical University (Stankin) and Stankoprom Company, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2014, no. 1 (28), pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petukhov, Yu.E. and Domnin, P.V., Determination of kinematic rear corners during processing of the screwshaped surfaces by standard straight profile cutters, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2014, no. 2 (29), pp. 27–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Isaev, A.V., Ilyukhin, Yu.V., et al., Engineering concept of robotic systems for metalworking and tool support systems, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2015, no. 4 (35), pp. 46–51.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Romanov, V.B., Ryabov, E.A., et al., Profile design of shaper cutter with any desired geometrical parameters, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2012, no. 4 (23), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isaev, A.V., Kozochkin, M.P., and Kuptsov, V.R., Specificity of counter and associated milling in the processing of thin-wall parts, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2013, no. 1 (24), pp. 11–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. N. Krestyaninov
    • 1
  • R. M. Khusainov
    • 1
  • S. Yu. Yurasov
    • 1
  • V. A. Grechishnikov
    • 2
  • V. B. Romanov
    • 2
  1. 1.Naberezhnye Chelny InstituteKazan Federal UniversityNaberezhnye ChelnyRussia
  2. 2.Stankin Moscow State Technological UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations