Russian Engineering Research

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 270–272 | Cite as

Technological inheritance in the machining of titanium alloys

  • V. A. Grechishnikov
  • G. A. Pautov
  • S. Yu. Yurasov
  • O. I. Yurasova


The surface quality and fatigue strength of structural titanium alloys are analyzed. Attention focuses on the work hardening, residual stress, fatigue strength, and the hydrogenation after machining in various conditions.


work hardening durability residual stress fatigue strength hardenability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Petukhov, Y.E., Pivkin, P.M., et al., Prediction and measurement of the parameters of the microtopography of a surface when turning intricately shaped parts, Meas. Tech., 2015, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 848–853.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Petukhov, Yu.E., Pivkin, P.M., Isaev, A.V., Romanov, V.B., and Domnin, P.V., Lathe turning of complex-shaped parts providing desired surface microrelief, Russ. Eng. Res., 2016, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kosarev, D.V., Grechishnikov, V.A., and Kosarev, V.A., Reducing the vibration when cutting internal threads by mills equipped with replaceable hard-alloy plates, Russ. Eng. Res., 2010, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 948–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chernetsov, V.N., Titan i ego splavy (Titanium and Its Alloys), Leningrad: Mashinostroenie, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    GOST (State Standard) 2860-75: Metals. Testing for Fatigue, Moscow: Izd. Standartov, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ryaboi, A.Ya. and Bronds, L.D., Povyshenie resursa aviatsionnykh detalei iz vysokoprochnykh stalei (Improvement of Operational Capacity of Aircraft Engines of Reinforced Steels), Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1977.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Obrabotka rezaniem zharoprochnykh, vysokoprochnykh i titanovykh splavov (Cutting of Heat-Resistant, High- Strength, and Titanium Alloys), Reznikov, A., Eds., Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petukhov, Yu.E. and Domnin, P.V., Shaping by a shaped helical surface by standard direct profile tool, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2011, no. 3, pp. 102–106.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grechishnikov, V.A. and Isaev, A.V., Adjustment of cutting blades along the helical flute in the contoured modular casing cutter, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2014, no. 2 (29), pp. 34–39.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Maslov, A.R., and Pivkin, P.M., The system of turning tools for the treatment of the end grooves on CNC machines, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2015, no. 2 (33), pp. 23–29.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grigor’ev, S.N., Kutin, A.A., and Dolgov, V.A., Principles of digital design of machine engineering industry, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2014, no. 4 (31), pp. 10–15.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petukhov, Yu.E. and Vodovozov, A.A., Mathematical model of the curved cutting edge of the highly strength twisted drill, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2012, no. 3, pp. 28–32.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grechishnikov, V.A., Romanov, V.B., Ryabov, E.A., et al., Profile design of shaper cutter with any desired geometrical parameters, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Tekhnol. Univ., Stankin, 2012, no. 4 (23), pp. 15–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Grechishnikov
    • 1
  • G. A. Pautov
    • 2
  • S. Yu. Yurasov
    • 2
  • O. I. Yurasova
    • 2
  1. 1.Stankin Moscow State Technological UniversityMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Naberezhnye Chelny InstituteKazan Federal UniversityNaberezhnye ChelnyRussia

Personalised recommendations