Advertisement

Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute

, Volume 39, Issue 12, pp 325–329 | Cite as

Study of DD-reaction yields from the Ti/TiO2:Dx heterostructure at low energies using the GELIS setup

  • A. V. Bagulya
  • O. D. Dalkarov
  • M. A. Negodaev
  • A. S. RusetskiiEmail author
  • A. P. Chubenko
Article

Abstract

The results of measurements of the DD-reaction yields from the Ti/TiO2:Dx heterostructure in the energy range of 10–25 keV are presented. Neutron and proton fluxes were measured using a neutron detector based on He-3 counters and a CR-39 plastic track detector. A comparison with calculations showed the existence of significant effects of DD-reaction yield amplification. The screening potential for this heterostructure under these experimental conditions was estimated to be in the range U e = 160–750 eV.

Keywords

DD-reactions screening potential proton and neutron fluxes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. A. Tsarev, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 160(11), 1 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Tsarev, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 162(10), 63 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. A. Tsarev and D. H. Worledge, Fusion Technology 22, 138 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V.A. Chechin, V.A. Tsarev, M. Rabinovitz, and Y. E. Kim, Int. J. Theor.Phys. 33, 617 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Raiola, P. Migliardi, G. Gyurky, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 13, 377 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. Raiola, P. Migliardi, L. Gang, et al., Phys. Lett. B 547, 193 (2002).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.G. Lipson, A. S. Roussetski, A. B. Karabut, and G.H. Miley, Zh. Eksp.Teor.Fiz. 127, 1334 (2005) [J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 100, 1175 (2005)].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. S. Bosch and G. M. Halle, Nucl. Fusion 32, 611 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. M. Bystritsky, Vit. M. Bystritskii, G. N. Dudkin, et al., Yad. Fiz. 75, 56 (2012) [Phys. At. Nucl. 75, 53 (2012)].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. A. Negodaev and A. V. Bagulya, Preprint No. 11 (Lebedev Physical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. V. Bagulya, O.D. Dalkarov, M. A. Negodaev, et al., Kratkie Soobshcheniya po Fizike FIAN, 39(9), 3 (2012) [Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Ibstitute 39, 247 (2012)].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. B. Aleksandrov, I. Yu. Apacheva, E. L. Feinberg, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 535, 542 (2004).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. H. Anderson and J.F. Ziegler, Hydrogen Stopping Powers and Ranges in All Elements (Pergamon, New York, 1977.)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. G. Lipson, A. S. Roussetski, B. F. Lyakhov, et al., Khim. Vysok. Energ. 42, 361 (2008) [High Energy Chemistry 42, 319 (2008)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Allerton Press, Inc. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. V. Bagulya
    • 1
  • O. D. Dalkarov
    • 1
  • M. A. Negodaev
    • 1
  • A. S. Rusetskii
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. P. Chubenko
    • 1
  1. 1.Lebedev Physical InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations